Ludi wrote:In what way is promoting the reduction in the need to earn, changing to a simpler largely vegetarian diet, growing one's own food or joining a community garden, changing to a home based business, etc etc "like saying now go kill youself"? In what way are any of the above activites lethal? These are just a very small sample of simple actions we can take to reduce our need for energy inputs (powerdown = reducing one's need for energy inputs).
In what way are any of these things indicative of a death cult or mad max survivalism?
Jenab6 wrote:So what "forced" the small farmer off his land?
rwwff wrote:Jenab6 wrote:So what "forced" the small farmer off his land?
Property taxes?
Jenab6 wrote: So what "forced" the small farmer off his land?
Novus wrote:After that last post Monte all I have to say to you is stay out of my way. You did a good job in waking us all up to Peak Oil but now it is time for you to move over. People with solutions are stepping forward and we are not going to let you tell us what cannot be done.
Novus wrote:MonteQuest wrote:So, let me get this straight: You have overextended yourself and you live way beyond your means. You are in debt up to your eyeballs, and going deeper into debt every day.
Your solution is to get out of debt by quitting your job and dropping out of society so the debt collectors can't collect.
rwwff wrote:Jenab6 wrote:So what "forced" the small farmer off his land?
Property taxes?
Jenab6 wrote:Like it or not: billions of people will die between 2050 and 2100. The world's population will shrink from 9 billion down to 1 billion or less. It's going to be death, death, death. And there's not one thing anybody can do to prevent it. It's too late.
Let South America do whatever it is they do down there.
Jenab6 wrote:So what "forced" the small farmer off his land?
Shannymara wrote:MonteQuest wrote:How could anyone presume to improve upon Nature?
That's why I don't think we should have a large scale population control program. That, and the fact that the people who get to make the decisions are invariably scumbags.
MacG wrote:Silvio Gesell argued that all land should be regarded as common, but should be leased out (on long term conditions) to the highest bidder.
Shannymara wrote:MonteQuest wrote:How could anyone presume to improve upon Nature?
That's why I don't think we should have a large scale population control program. That, and the fact that the people who get to make the decisions are invariably scumbags.
MonteQuest wrote: Says a lot about how tenuous the few cereal grains are in our food supply.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests