Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

My simple 2013 model

Discuss research and forecasts regarding hydrocarbon depletion.

My simple 2013 model

Unread postby NTBKtrader » Tue 19 Oct 2004, 21:49:19

Total worldwide liquids resources discovered through end-2003 amounted to 2,285 billion barrels with cumulative production of 1,020 billion barrels. The remaining resources of 1,265 billion barrels imply global liquids depletion of 44.6% at end-2003.

http://home.businesswire.com/portal/sit ... ewsLang=en

We've used 44.6 % of known oil reserves. Using simple math
1,265 (reserves)-1,020 (used) = 245 (barrels left until midpoint)

We use around 30 billion barrels of oil a year. Take note that I'm roughly figuring that new production might offset increased demand so

245/30 = 8.16 years left until mid point or around the year 2013

I'm also not taking into account that the Middle East will quickly make up a lot of that slack so geo-political factors may hasten things.

Thoughts? Too simplistic?
User avatar
NTBKtrader
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 600
Joined: Tue 19 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby pinou » Wed 20 Oct 2004, 01:42:52

Or too optimistic?

See the Nemesis Report in ASPO's newsletter 15, item #35
http://www.asponews.org/ASPO.newsletter.015.php

pinou
User avatar
pinou
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 12
Joined: Tue 01 Jun 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Switzerland

pretty accurate for 2013

Unread postby duff_beer_dragon » Wed 20 Oct 2004, 08:11:34

the Middle East will quickly make up a lot of that slack


If I were you I'd go with that.
duff_beer_dragon
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 218
Joined: Mon 04 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: the Village

Unread postby pup55 » Wed 20 Oct 2004, 11:54:47

I kind of like it. Simple is good.

The weak link, of course, is the estimate of "oil discoveries". No one can really tell how much of this stuff is underground until they try to pump it and it either comes out or doesn't.

If you read the APSO newsletter article mentioned above, there are a lot of comments like "there is a consensus" or "experts state", etc. etc. so they're not 100% certain either, since egos are involved, particularly among "experts".
User avatar
pup55
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5249
Joined: Wed 26 May 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby NTBKtrader » Wed 20 Oct 2004, 12:03:59

pup55 wrote:I kind of like it. Simple is good.

The weak link, of course, is the estimate of "oil discoveries". No one can really tell how much of this stuff is underground until they try to pump it and it either comes out or doesn't.

If you read the APSO newsletter article mentioned above, there are a lot of comments like "there is a consensus" or "experts state", etc. etc. so they're not 100% certain either, since egos are involved, particularly among "experts".


I definitely agree, I've read from several sources that the Middle East reserves may be overstated because of their quota system. time will tell...
User avatar
NTBKtrader
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 600
Joined: Tue 19 Oct 2004, 03:00:00


Return to Peak oil studies, reports & models

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests