Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

1 Aluminum can = 3 hours TV

How to save energy through both societal and individual actions.

1 Aluminum can = 3 hours TV

Unread postby grabby » Wed 21 Dec 2005, 00:17:12

Recycling 1 ton of aluminum saves the equivalent in energy of 2,350 gallons of gasoline. This is equivalent to the amount of electricity used by the typical home over a period of 10 years.


One recycled aluminum can saves enough electricity to operate a TV for three hours.


Using recycled aluminum beverage cans to produce new cans allows the aluminum can industry to make up to 20 times more cans for the same amount of energy.

one pound aluminum equal a gallon of gas in power usage.

ALUMINUM is the epitomy of waste and largess.

Aluminum will become very expensive soon.

In 1900 before electrolysis, an ounce of aluminum cost 10 times what an ounce of Gold cost.

Chemically, it is almost impossible to manufacture, you have to have electric power.
User avatar
grabby
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1291
Joined: Tue 08 Nov 2005, 04:00:00

Re: 1 Aluminum can = 3 hours TV

Unread postby MattSavinar » Wed 21 Dec 2005, 01:15:04

This is why I have all my assets invested in recyclable cans.

Best,

Matt
User avatar
MattSavinar
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 1918
Joined: Sun 09 May 2004, 03:00:00

Re: 1 Aluminum can = 3 hours TV

Unread postby MattSavinar » Wed 21 Dec 2005, 01:29:04

Actually, all joking aside I suspect one of the few industries to survive into the post-peak world will be recycling. For those of you mulling over "what careers/jobs/businesses should I look into", I found the following on google. Sure there are more like it out there:

http://www.p2pays.org/rbac/

Best,

Matt
User avatar
MattSavinar
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 1918
Joined: Sun 09 May 2004, 03:00:00

Re: 1 Aluminum can = 3 hours TV

Unread postby Guest » Wed 21 Dec 2005, 02:24:11

MattSavinar wrote:Actually, all joking aside I suspect one of the few industries to survive into the post-peak world will be recycling. For those of you mulling over "what careers/jobs/businesses should I look into", I found the following on google. Sure there are more like it out there:

http://www.p2pays.org/rbac/

Best,

Matt


No thank you. I would rather go long on commodities and cash out when tshtf. Going over someone's trash is not my cup of tea.

Cheers,
Guest
 

Re: 1 Aluminum can = 3 hours TV

Unread postby tdrive » Wed 21 Dec 2005, 02:26:33

That above was me. Wonder why I have to relog sometimes twice. Weird.

Cheers,
User avatar
tdrive
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 334
Joined: Sun 11 Jul 2004, 03:00:00

Re: 1 Aluminum can = 3 hours TV

Unread postby Dezakin » Wed 21 Dec 2005, 16:39:33

Aluminum will become very expensive soon.

This doesnt follow. Peak oil has only tangental effects on electricity supply given that we produce hardly any electricity at all from oil.
Chemically, it is almost impossible to manufacture, you have to have electric power

Fortunately electric power is cheap and is likely to remain so for centuries.
User avatar
Dezakin
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1569
Joined: Wed 09 Feb 2005, 04:00:00

Re: 1 Aluminum can = 3 hours TV

Unread postby Dukat_Reloaded » Wed 21 Dec 2005, 17:04:43

Aluminum was more expensive than gold because people did not know how to get it out of the ore, only the free formed Aluminum was mined and it was very rare until someone learn't how to extract it from the ore.
User avatar
Dukat_Reloaded
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 953
Joined: Sun 31 Jul 2005, 03:00:00

Re: 1 Aluminum can = 3 hours TV

Unread postby smallpoxgirl » Wed 21 Dec 2005, 17:43:19

grabby wrote:One recycled aluminum can saves enough electricity to operate a TV for three hours.


You know what saves even more electricity? Not drinking from disposable containers.

In general I'm pretty skeptical about recycling. Our problem is that we are obsessed w/ consumption. It's not that we need to perfect our methods of consumption, it's that we need to stop consuming. Recycling, IMHO, is generally just a way for people to dodge the moral impact of their destructive consumption. "I'm drinking water that was shipped a thousand miles to get to my house wasting huge amounts of energy. As long as I recycle the bottle, I don't have to feel bad."

It's reduce, reuse, recycle. Recycling is worse than useless if you forget the first two steps.
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00

Re: 1 Aluminum can = 3 hours TV

Unread postby dooberheim » Sun 25 Dec 2005, 17:28:19

I've watched the demise of reusable containers over the last thirty years with sadness.

Recycling as practiced in most American cities these days wastes more energy than it saves. Only aluminum is worth recycling when one factors in the energy costs to sort, bale, and transport the other materials to a reuse facility. It would be better to burn one's paper and plastic (in an efficient incinerator or heater) to heat the house and simply take in one's cans ever now and then. And whatever happened to returnable bottles? Milk, soda and beer bottles are so much better reused than recycled - surely returning a load of cases via train saves more energy than melting them down and making new, right?

DK
Carpe Scrotum!
User avatar
dooberheim
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 296
Joined: Sun 07 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Columbia, MO

Re: 1 Aluminum can = 3 hours TV

Unread postby Kingcoal » Sun 25 Dec 2005, 18:30:20

This brings up a point that has always erked me. What alot of people call recycling is actually remanufacturing. Prior to the disposable age, people brought their own containers to the store and filled them. Perhaps peak oil will bring back that practice.
User avatar
Kingcoal
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2149
Joined: Wed 29 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Pennsylvania, USA

Re: 1 Aluminum can = 3 hours TV

Unread postby backstop » Sun 25 Dec 2005, 18:35:12

In the interest of recycling back in the '80s, a bunch of UK environmentalists (FOE) mounted a campaign targeting businesses' usage of new paper.

Since Thatcher was at the time donning a Green headscarf, the campaign was supported by business, and recycled paper gained some serious market share.

The largest papermilll in S. UK, at Sittingbourne in Kent, thus decided to end its timber purchase and go over to recycling paper only.

Great News ? For who ? For FOE membership maybe, but no one else.

The 100,000 tonnes /yr of timber Sittingbourne terminated was grown in Coppice Woodlands across Kent, and in losing its market, they've lost their viability and are being plowed up or left to go derelict, with no youngsters being trained on in their forestry skills.

Those coppices were Britain's most ancient sustainable production industry.

STUFF the idiocy of urbocentric recyclists where the sun don't shine !!!

regards,

Backstop
Last edited by backstop on Sun 25 Dec 2005, 20:09:27, edited 1 time in total.
"The best of conservation . . . is written not with a pen but with an axe."
(from "A Sand County Almanac" by Aldo Leopold, 1948.
backstop
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1463
Joined: Tue 24 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Varies

Re: 1 Aluminum can = 3 hours TV

Unread postby EnergySpin » Sun 25 Dec 2005, 18:43:38

The sad statistic is that people who watch TV drink beer contained in aluminum cans. Turning off the TV and not drinking the pop/beer could have significant gains for the environment, one's waist and brain.
"Nuclear power has long been to the Left what embryonic-stem-cell research is to the Right--irredeemably wrong and a signifier of moral weakness."Esquire Magazine,12/05
The genetic code is commaless and so are my posts.
User avatar
EnergySpin
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2248
Joined: Sat 25 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

Re: 1 Aluminum can = 3 hours TV

Unread postby dooberheim » Mon 26 Dec 2005, 20:38:38

I love Yuengling - my family lives in Tampa, Florida, and when I go there I pick some up. They bought the old Schlitz plant there - a good use of it in my book.

When I moved here we had returnables (beer) from Busch, Miller and Huber (Wisconsin). All have since discontinued selling beer in returnable bottles. Shame. I haven't seen a returnable milk container since 1963 or so. We had returnable pop bottles here until about 1998, again, what's the problem? You make the stuff here, refill them here, you don't need to buy new containers!!!

I think some of this is fear of liability - some slick lawyer would sue Pepsi for giving his client AIDS or something like that. Some people have to find a USEFUL profession.

DK
Carpe Scrotum!
User avatar
dooberheim
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 296
Joined: Sun 07 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Columbia, MO

Re: 1 Aluminum can = 3 hours TV

Unread postby coyote » Sun 22 Jan 2006, 21:31:01

Dezakin wrote:
Aluminum will become very expensive soon.

This doesnt follow. Peak oil has only tangental effects on electricity supply given that we produce hardly any electricity at all from oil.
Chemically, it is almost impossible to manufacture, you have to have electric power

Fortunately electric power is cheap and is likely to remain so for centuries.

Unfortunately, a lot of out electricity is produced from natural gas and coal, which are also nonrenewable fuels, and are also showing signs of faltering, especially NG. And, of course, more of those fuels will be pulled aside to make up for shortfalls in oil supply... No, after Peak Oil electricity will not remain cheap for many years, let alone centuries.
Lord, here comes the flood
We'll say goodbye to flesh and blood
If again the seas are silent in any still alive
It'll be those who gave their island to survive...
User avatar
coyote
News Editor
News Editor
 
Posts: 1979
Joined: Sun 23 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Location: East of Eden

Re: 1 Aluminum can = 3 hours TV

Unread postby dbuckley » Sun 22 Jan 2006, 23:31:02

coyote wrote: No, after Peak Oil electricity will not remain cheap for many years, let alone centuries.

The whole economics of aluminium production is predicated on (very) cheap electricity.

Here in NZ we have the Cromalco smelter, which runs on clean, green, 100% hydro generated electricity. The deal to get Cromalco here was done many years ago, when NZ was 100% hydro electricity.

Times change, of course, and now total renewables now make up 70% of our electricity, the rest being NG and coal. Comalco are looking fo another good long-term deal giving them cheap electricity, in a country (...world) that is facing increasing energy costs.

NZ is torn - we'd like to see the back of Cromalco, they use 15% of all our electricity, so getting that power back would make a big difference to our thermal generation needs. But losing Cromalco would mean the end of lots of jobs (effectively the dessimation of a region, a bit like what happened to mining villages in Wales), and loss of foreign income and tax.
User avatar
dbuckley
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 59
Joined: Sun 09 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Location: New Zealand

Re: 1 Aluminum can = 3 hours TV

Unread postby Dukat_Reloaded » Wed 25 Jan 2006, 18:42:06

It's quite pathetic how all the drink containers were made out of glass and recycled earlier to now where nothing is reused. Convenience is what has fueled this massive uptake of disposable products, infact convenience is still making inroads into every corner of our lives, until oil runs out, our lives will become more and more convenient until the system topples over itself. I still perfer plastic bottles over glass, I believe glass bottles are dangerous, where ever I look there is a smashed bottle somewhere, animals, humans, cars and bikes all suffer when moving over broken glass, and our Australian bush is absoultly littered with glass and broken bottles which causes bush fires on hot days
User avatar
Dukat_Reloaded
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 953
Joined: Sun 31 Jul 2005, 03:00:00


Return to Conservation & Efficiency

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests