The annual nationwide survey by the Bee Informed Partnership found 37.7% of honeybee colonies died this past winter, nearly 9 percentage points higher than the average winter loss.
The survey of nearly 4,700 beekeepers managing more than 300,000 colonies goes back 13 years and is conducted by bee experts at the University of Maryland, Auburn University and several other colleges.
... Year-to-year bee colony losses, which include calculations for summer, were 40.7%, higher than normal, but not a record high, the survey found.
"The beekeepers are working harder than ever to manage colonies but we still lose 40-50% each year... unacceptable," Swiss bee expert Jeff Pettis, who wasn't part of the survey, said in an email...
Newfie wrote:That is apparently true even for viruses. Sometimes they are very lethal, so lethal they risk killing off the host population. So they tend to mutate to reduce their lethality. They really don’t want to kill the host just live in it.
Humans could learn something there.
Ibon wrote:Newfie wrote:That is apparently true even for viruses. Sometimes they are very lethal, so lethal they risk killing off the host population. So they tend to mutate to reduce their lethality. They really don’t want to kill the host just live in it.
Humans could learn something there.
The common cold virus a case in point was speculated to have started as a lethal virus and eventually through selection established itself as just a nuisance. This tendency to mutate to reduce lethality is the process that happens after they initially cause potentially massive die-offs of their host. It is the survivors that get through the bottleneck that are the results of selection of less lethal forms.
This is a good allegory for Kudzu Apes moving through the grist mill of consequences. The possible cultural evolution that can result will rest on the dead bodies of billions.......
Confusing evolution with adaptation. Viruses can evolve in a matter of days/weeks. Humans, with their slow reproduction cycles, evolve slowly, but their adaptations can revert to self-destructive patterns in a short period. One is a fundamental DNA change. The other is purely behavioral (or, as Ibon said, cultural). One need only look at human cultural changes over the last hundred years to know how temporary these changes are. Joseph Campbell posited that this is why humans need religion; as a foundational behavioral check.
GHung wrote:One need only look at human cultural changes over the last hundred years to know how temporary these changes are. Joseph Campbell posited that this is why humans need religion; as a foundational behavioral check.
Ibon wrote: .........
I am with Joseph Campbell, being a sentient mortal brought about religion. The existential threats that are around the corner will only reinforce the need for some spiritual basis to be nurtured in order to bring meaning to upcoming consequences. Hopefully that will be framed within the ecological reality of events so that this can embed reverence for our mother earth.
That we embrace science does not negate the need for a major spiritual renaissance. Not needed though before the consequences since it is actually the consequences themselves which will germinate a spiritual renaissance of sorts, by my estimation anyway. \
"this extinction is no accident. Rather, it is the outcome of a human history in which concentrated hegemonic powers required the erasure of any form of communication that precluded their understanding and, crucially, their control."
"Humanity is losing the knowledge, the variety of worldviews, and the cosmologies that indigenous communities have for centuries encoded in these languages and cultures. Let there be no doubt: This is a mass extinction,”
"if you tune out their language … you’re denying that they had a history. If you deny they had a history, you’re denying their humanity. If you deny their humanity, you can imprison them, you can kill them, you can drown them—it doesn’t matter, because they are not significant."
"in country after country, the dominant culture tries to wipe out the language"
"there’s something inherently subversive or threatening about these different languages, because they define life differently ... it’s not an accident that these languages get crushed"
"you have a cultural imperialism that seems like it’s not engineered and mindless, but has all the power of massive armies to change people, to deny any rebellion they might have, to convince them that they’re happy being dominated"
" even the Old Testament, what’s the first sentence there? “In the beginning was the Word.” But what is the second sentence? “And the Word was with God.” ... a very radical notion that before the world was the Word ... the second sentence is introducing hierarchy. It’s introducing authority, immediately. So empires have always done that, and they’ve always took specific care that they were in charge of stories."
"One of the things that was done to the slave population was to strip it of the protection of language, and strip it of any connection with Africa."
"its essential mechanism of freedom is to be able to define the language you want to use, express yourself in your own language, and state power that wants to control completely has to own language. That was the message of Orwell, of Huxley: the ultimate power requires controlling language"
"what happens when language disappears? You know, what takes its place? And it’s really a scary, solitary world when you can’t communicate "
"Rosetta Stone is a piece of granite with three scripts in Egyptian hieroglyphs, in demotic, and in Greek. What is it? ... what is the monument to? It’s essentially a monument to an extinction of languages, the extinction that is of a profound cultural nature. Because it needed translation. There were very few Egyptian priests that could understand the hieroglyphs anymore, because that was already an extinct language. So they had to be translated into also a language that was demotic, and then the language of power, which was Greek ... if we want to have some kind of record of the variousness, actually, of our human mind ... we are not monolithic. That our human creativity has all these various ways to be."
"I sometimes see this kind of blanking out by people who really would rather not hear anything of what goes on in the places where they go to bomb, where they go to conquer, or of the people that they silence. "
"if we’re not aware of it, the beauty of the language, the complexity, or if we get angry because we can’t immediately understand it, we doom ourselves to ignorance "
"We have become provincial"
" they contain an inconvenient truth. They force us to see the limits of our own culture, our own arrogance."
"we are actually wired to want to know others; as much as we are brainwashed to deny them by power structures, actually, in us, we have also a very profound communal sense. And we want to know what the world is made up of, and other voices"
" it’s a fatally boring construction, actually, the idea of melting us all into one. It’s a denial of what makes life worth living, which is alternatives, and differences, and different perceptions "
"when we’re so narrow, when we block it out. Whether we do it institutionally, we do it through our mega-cultural, massive, you know, cultural enterprises, and commercialized culture. But we become tone-deaf "
ozcad wrote:If we are not careful we might elect ignorant rulers
dohboi wrote:Language is generally seen as prerequisite for intelligence. But we are rapidly losing languages. Yes, like species, languages have gone extinct in the past. But again, like species, all indications are that the current rate of loss of languages is far faster than in earlier times.
Return to Environment, Weather & Climate
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests