KaiserJeep wrote: Either you live at your parent's home, or you find at least 5 roomates to share a house, regardless of citizenship status.
Newfie wrote:So even here we can’t discuss how many folks we want in the USA.
Alfred Tennyson wrote:We are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.
Tanada wrote: The reason I didn't cut Canada is they had a very sparsely populated country up until about 1960 and they are a long way from crowded even now.
Cog wrote:A large portion of Canada is uninhabitable due to temperature. So acreage doesn't matter if you can't support the people who want to live on it.
Newfie wrote:
So, it looks to me like the only region here who should even be having an immigration debate is Canada.
Does ANYONE here significantly disagree? Does anyone want to argue for a higher number?
Newfie wrote:Dodging the issue. If the right answer is 200-250 million then it seems absurd have immigration when we are at 330 million.
It’s pretty simple.
Forget all the drama and bigotry and accusations. The population needs to shrink.
Immigration is like a 330 pound guy whining about being fat while knocking back a Super Sized soda.
Return to North America Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests