Yoshua wrote:Chesapeake geologist - Shale wells are not economic.
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/us/n ... p20/a22730
Yoshua wrote:Chesapeake geologist - Shale wells are not economic.
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/us/n ... p20/a22730
Yoshua wrote:ConocoPhillips geologist - The biggest uneconomic field in the world.
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/us/n ... /p2/a23513
My guess is that shale gas would not have been possible to develop without the petrodollar, the QE program and trade deficits, since the US would not have had the energy to develop the shale Ponzi with domestic energy.
Do not bring Etp into this thread. You will be Borged
My guess is that shale gas would not have been possible to develop without the petrodollar, the QE program and trade deficits, since the US would not have had the energy to develop the shale Ponzi with domestic energy.
pstarr wrote:"Shale gas began development around 1825 . . . "
Adam you have finally and completely lost it. And I mean it. Every bit of it. lol
Cheers
Yoshua wrote:Resistance is futile !
I love oil people. They just won't give up, even if the odds are against them. They have decided to make America into an energy super power and so shall it be.
Not sure how they will fix this one ?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests