Newfie wrote:You asked why, I told you. Never said it was my wish.
Read what I said, don't read into it.
Cog wrote:I do not desire a government sheepherder. I wish to be left alone. If you social engineers desire to set up a utopia, go buy the land, move in your hippie scum, and leave me the hell out of it.
Cog wrote:That is indeed true. But I am not limited to working on roads. I've worked on McDonald's, Walgreens, etc private construction projects, subdivision construction, boundary surveys both small and large, and any number of other infrastructure projects that have zilch to do with roads and bridges.
AgentR11 wrote:Obama needs to run for congress so he can get his stupid idea up for vote. I see no mechanism for such a proposal to even see the light of day in the House. No need to oppose it.. it'll never be in a position to get voted on.
Lore wrote:$10 is a good start.
Plantagenet wrote: which will form a starting point for negotiations over next year's budget in the house.
2. The most likely mechanism for the $10 bbl tax to see the light of day in the house is for the Ds to win the house in 2016 or 2018 and then pass this new tax.
Newfie wrote:Yes, a good deep recession in order to return to some semblance of balance and get the government stripped down.
Cog wrote:Instead of feeding the bloated federal government, we should be starving it into submission.
lpetrich wrote:Cog wrote:Instead of feeding the bloated federal government, we should be starving it into submission.
Is it some occupying army? Should the United States be broken up into 50+ separate nations? Like what happened to the Soviet Union, Yugoslavia, and Czechoslovakia.
More seriously, I think that the tax is a good idea, at least in the absence of raising fuel taxes.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests