Not without oxygen, was my point.pstarr wrote:He's not joking, just confused. Hint: water combusts at 4950 deg F, and freezes at 32 deg F, and methane freezes at -295.6°F. So yes it combusts, just not on the surface of Titan.
Not without oxygen, was my point.pstarr wrote:He's not joking, just confused. Hint: water combusts at 4950 deg F, and freezes at 32 deg F, and methane freezes at -295.6°F. So yes it combusts, just not on the surface of Titan.
The Martian is directed by Ridley Scott and stars Matt Damon as Mark Watney, an astronaut stranded on Mars after being presumed dead when a dust storm forces his crew to evacuate their base without him. Watney must find a way to contact NASA while also surviving on a planet without food or water.
This movie does not waste time getting started, and quickly sets the plot in motion by forcing the crew to evacuate and stranding Watney on Mars. Aside from one or two large time jumps, the film's pacing was solid and kept the plot moving while never overwhelming the viewer. For a survival movie, it had a rather sparse amount of the thrills, however those it did provide were unpredictable and truly felt consequential, each one radically altering Watney's situation.
The film's script inherits the books humorous and snarky dialogue, and manages to balance it with the perils of Watney's situation perfectly. Watney provides comic relief and often makes light of his dire situation, however through Matt Damon's performance and a sharp script, the humor never clashes with the film's survivalist tone.
Speaking of Matt Damon, he proves massively watchable as Mark Watney, and even gives a surprisingly committed performance as his body begins to suffer from his food rationing. He delivers the dialogue well, and I feel in the hands of a lesser actor a lot of the snarky writing would have come off as awkward or out of place. While I would not say his performance goes as far as Sandra Bullock in Gravity, another one-person space survival, it is nonetheless solid and at times quite impressive....
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt3659388/
onlooker wrote:A manned mission to Mars from what I have heard is extremely extremely difficult.
The Neumann drive is very different from NASA’s HiPEP counterpart, relying on basic principles to power the drive. In Neumann’s system, he uses a solid propellant and an electrical arc to vaporize the propellant into a cloud of ions, electrons and neutral vapor. This mixture is accelerated through an anode ring and then focused using a magnetic field. This combination pushes the gas mixture out in a contiguous pattern of short and light bursts.
Neumann’s engine has several advantages that set it apart from competing ion drives. First, the Neumann prototype uses basic principles of physics for its propulsion system and is simple in design, which makes it easy to operate and repair. Also, it can be powered by several different commonly-found metallic substrates, with the best thus far being magnesium. This multi-fuel capability contrasts with NASA’s drive, which requires the gas Xenon to run.
SeaGypsy wrote:Ion engines have very little to do with Earth-Mars, maybe of some assistance for fine tuning trajectories, but wont ever solve the problem of getting back. Thrust rockets, burn, a lot of stuff, including O2, which is free on Earth, unknown on Mars.
Mars will be a suicide mission. No return. Death by either radiation or system failure. The glamour from this side of that event is overwhelming.
My 10c- go on get on with it. The sooner that pipe dream dies the better. We need to wake up on this planet.
Subjectivist wrote:Constant thrust at even very low acceleration provides you with a hyperbolic transfer orbit instead of a Holman parabolic coasting orbit. A trip of years becomes a trip of a few months, greatly limiting all the problems that arise while coasting in deep space.
Alfred Tennyson wrote:We are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.
Return to Environment, Weather & Climate
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 165 guests