.
how does the meme of "porn doomerism" has a connection with the theory that Peak oil is debunked ?
is it thread drift , is someone pulling the discussion like one's beloved pulling the blanket on a cold night ?
Whatever wrote:Those who choose to ignore StarvingLion do so at their own peril.
Whatever wrote: Out of almost all the posters here, StarvingLion is the most accurate poster when it comes to rapid collapse. He is right about the nigh part, too.
Whatever wrote:"The entire Peak Oil narrative is wrong. There is no decline, just instant collapse."
~StarvingLion
That is what I have been saying for years.
Whatever wrote:Out of almost all the posters here, StarvingLion is the most accurate poster when it comes to rapid collapse. He is right about the nigh part, too.
sparky wrote:how does the meme of "porn doomerism" has a connection with the theory that Peak oil is debunked ? is it thread drift , is someone pulling the discussion like one's beloved pulling the blanket on a cold night ?
AdamB wrote:Whatever wrote:Out of almost all the posters here, StarvingLion is the most accurate poster when it comes to rapid collapse. He is right about the nigh part, too.
So when you go down to the corner store to spend your worthless dollars, they don't hand you goods or services in exchange for them?
AdamB wrote:Where might this place be, where StarvingLions accuracy is so obvious?
AdamB wrote:Whatever wrote:"The entire Peak Oil narrative is wrong. There is no decline, just instant collapse."
~StarvingLion
That is what I have been saying for years.
Little problem with that "instant" part then. How many years (in the case of peak oil, decades now) can we continue to wait for "instant"?
ennui2 wrote:Before you even joined, StarvingLion was already viewed by all concerned as a run of the mill internet nutcase not worth anyone's attention. For you to throw your arms around him says a lot about your critical-thinking skills (or lack thereof). He has nothing informative or useful to offer. All he wants to do is shake his proverbial fist and anything and everything. Kind of a mindless misanthrope.
Whatever wrote:Sorry to wake you from your peaceful slumber.
Whatever wrote:StarvingLion is saying that the system is rotten to the core and about to collapse rapidly.
Whatever wrote:So since it hasn't happened yet, we can safely assume that it never will?
Whatever wrote:Like I said, compared to the usual peak oil denial crap on display here, StarvingLion's comments are an occasional breath of fresh air. Much of what he says sounds a little hysterical, but he is much closer to the truth than you are.
Pstarr wrote:Starve is a rational
ennui2 wrote:Whatever wrote:So since it hasn't happened yet, we can safely assume that it never will?
Forcing us to prove a negative again? Really? Have you learned nothing about that fallacy? Occam's razor. Occams razor....
ennui2 wrote:Whatever wrote:Like I said, compared to the usual peak oil denial crap on display here, StarvingLion's comments are an occasional breath of fresh air. Much of what he says sounds a little hysterical, but he is much closer to the truth than you are.
Well, considering that the site's domain is peakoil.com, if you think people here are in denial maybe it's not so much denial as an accurate depiction of the status quo and you're holding onto outmoded overly doomy ideas.
pstarr wrote:ennui keeps posting his stupid insulting art in place of cogent arguments. He should be banned and you whatever need to be praised. What a breath of fresh air. Someone who understand the peakoil predicament here at the peakoil website. How novel. Are there others? Seems not.
whatever, thank you for raising the bar here.
pstarr wrote:ennui has improved my game, I've learned how to deal with amateurish unscientific b@llsh@t. I've learned how to respond to idiocy with kindness, patience and humor.
Whatever wrote:I am not asking you to prove a negative
Whatever wrote:Or perhaps this site's domain name was chosen specifically to fake people out.
Whatever wrote:I am finding it harder and harder to devote the time necessary to such a useless project. I will soon be forced to sign off forever. Oh well.
ennui2 wrote:Anytime you word something along the lines of "prove it can't happen", you're proving a negative. Anything can happen, including bigfoot appearing in front of the White House next to UFOs and Jimmy Hoffa. But is it LIKELY?
ennui2 wrote:Regardless of your interpretation, most know Occam's Razor as just that, extraordinary claims (i.e. the end of the world as we know it to happen suddenly and very nigh) require extraordinary proof, of which you've provided none.
ennui2 wrote:Whatever wrote:I am finding it harder and harder to devote the time necessary to such a useless project. I will soon be forced to sign off forever. Oh well.
Disaffected users already created a rival site in the past (malthusia). Rather than tilting at windmills maybe you and PStarr should go start your own. Or maybe build out The Hills Group since that page still (as I've said many times) looks like it was erected by someone who got on the internet via a free AOL disc and a 56K modem.
pstarr wrote:ennui and adam must enjoy insults and humiliation. Otherwise there is no other explanation for their persistent hollow comments, stupid and illogical put-downs. I am thinking a psychological meme?
pstarr wrote:Because neither has even submitted reputable thermodynamic, economic, geologic (or even magical arguments) to contradict peak oil. All they offer is snide comments, and stupid pictures. weak stuff
Whatever wrote:falling total energy must eventually lead to...
Whatever wrote:Given the conditions of falling total energy
Whatever wrote:I am asking you to prove that the inevitable won't happen.
Whatever wrote:you can't seem to deal with either one.
Whatever wrote:it is now time to apply what I have learned so that I can personally avoid dying in the apocalypse. You, ennui, will die sitting at your keyboard, like a deer in the headlights, denying the obvious all the way. Good luck.
PStarr wrote:ennui and adam must enjoy insults and humiliation.
pstarr wrote:ennui and adam must enjoy insults and humiliation. Otherwise there is no other explanation for their persistent hollow comments, stupid and illogical put-downs. I am thinking a psychological meme?
Because neither has even submitted reputable thermodynamic, economic, geologic (or even magical arguments) to contradict peak oil. All they offer is snide comments, and stupid pictures. weak stuff
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 230 guests