Stovepipe wrote:some_guy282 wrote:Bartlett lecture
You should watch that video yourself if you havn't yet. See if you can get this other guy to watch it too. If that doesn't shut him up, nothing will.
the link doesn't work for me.
rogerhb wrote:Assuming we can't duplicate members:
EndDays
clueless
sciencegirl
oil4u
holmes wrote:The problem with me is that I would excuse myself for a bathroom break and come back with a big rock and crush the persons Im debating skull. especially if it was a developer. LOL. Just kidding.
We need to build an entropic ecological debat team. PMS would be the debate coach. fun stuff. We would all have to be armed to the teeth as well. We would get many threats and possible attacks.
lateStarter wrote:And rogerhb - you forgot to specify your alternate.
PenultimateManStanding wrote:A good debater needs to understand human psycology.
Damn, rog, I just finished correcting my mispelling of "psychology" and you come in with this. But beyond that, what are you talking about? "original remit," "disheartened?" What are you talking about?rogerhb wrote:PenultimateManStanding wrote:A good debater needs to understand human psycology.
I was going by the original remit, and wanting people who wouldn't tire or get disheartened.
PenultimateManStanding wrote:what are talking about? "original remit," "disheartened?" What are you talking about?
lateStarter wrote:articulate (in their own way), and unflappable (meaning: not subject to normal rules of logic)
Ah, I get what you are saying. Sorry pal, I am both articulate, and schooled in logic. Its an arcane and obscure part of Western education anymore, but I took it and reveled in it. I understand that computer science was built upon logic. I enjoyed it very much. The prof said that Asian women were the best at it, but I equalled them, probably surpassed therm. And for qwerty, I play a mean game of chess too.rogerhb wrote:PenultimateManStanding wrote:what are talking about? "original remit," "disheartened?" What are you talking about?lateStarter wrote:articulate (in their own way), and unflappable (meaning: not subject to normal rules of logic)
lateStarter wrote:My initial offering: holmes, Raphael, qwerty, and Lorenzo. Miki could serve as an alternate.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests