SeaGypsy wrote:How audacious were these plans in the 1st place? They were always unfunded nonsense; only collective wishfull thinking let anyone believe otherwise.
There is a lot of variation between plans. Some are a lot better then others as far as solvency goes. Some require no employee contributions and the government entity has not invested enough or any money to build a fund. these are the ones that are looking at contribution rates that are 40% of current payroll or higher. Others like the one I paid into take a good chunk of the employees wages before taxes and invest them broadly. In my case the contribution rate was six percent and over the thirty years I paid in very close to 45K and with interest it added up to 100K. The rub comes in the amount of matching funds that should have been invested by the employer to keep the fund solvent. Something every legislative body finds hard to do any tight budget year. And on top of that is the soaring cost of health care which is eating up any fund balance in every retirement plan. Nobody ever put enough away to cover that and it is as if they planned on the government taking over health care on the United Kingdom model and the liability just fading away.
And then there is the biggest unfunded ponzi scheme of all ,Social security. compared to that one most of these other plans are paragons of fiscal responsibility. At least when the government stops trying to pay the bills on that one everyone will be in the same boat and the price of golf and mobile homes in Florida will drop for everyone.