abelardlindsay wrote:Starving to death is arguably worse than dying in war which is usually over in a few seconds. Starving to death though is terribly painful when you're body starts slowly consuming its own organs, and is drawn out over weeks and ends in delerium.
Actually, no, it generally isn't. All reports I've heard say that the first days of not eating are the hardest, not the last. By then you are pretty numb.
Anyway, there is no reason whatsoever to think that anybody will starve in any of the developed countries. Certainly not in the USA, with plenty of farmland. So stop dramatizing.
abelardlindsay wrote:Do you really think in 20 years there are still going to be 6 billion people on the planet?
Yep. I do. I don't see why agriculture, of all things, would have to go down the drain, when there is so much slack in other things to cut first. Oil for essential things is the very last thing anybody is going to cut.
abelardlindsay wrote:Wouldn't you be happy that your government was thinking about you?
That's the great question, isn't it? Who is the American government thinking about? I'd be a lot happier if I knew for certain they are thinking about the average American Joe, but I'm not that sure.
abelardlindsay wrote:Why do you think the Russians and the Chinese and the Europeans are moving the whole Iran security council thing forward?
It's obvious, isn't it?
But then, why do you think that none of them are too happy to get their hands dirty? Maybe because there are plenty of gun-ho Americans to do the job? Maybe if the Americans weren't so happy to do the dirty jobs, the world would have to find a better solution to the problem.