Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

If You Can't Play The Game Then Complain About The Rules

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

If You Can't Play The Game Then Complain About The Rules

Unread postby BabyPeanut » Fri 25 Feb 2005, 00:15:08

http://www.rte.ie/business/2005/0224/presswatch.html
FIRMS HIT AT SEC'S RESERVES JUDGEMENTS - The Daily Telegraph says some of the world's biggest oil and gas companies have backed a report which is heavily critical of the way that the US Securities and Exchange Commission forces them to account for their reserves.

The report, which was supported by BP, Exxon Mobil and Chevron Texaco, among others, claimed that the SEC's definition of reserves accounting had 'failed to keep pace with a changing, increasingly global industry' and 'falls short of accurately describing industry and individual companies' values'.

The paper says the SEC is under pressure to reform its strict treatment of companies' oil and gas reserves. The issue has come under the spotlight since Shell admitted that, under the SEC's 'proven' definition, it had exaggerated its reserves by a third.

But hey those rules were fine for decades before.
BabyPeanut
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3275
Joined: Tue 17 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: 39° 39' N 77° 77' W or thereabouts

Unread postby pilferage » Fri 25 Feb 2005, 00:33:52

You see, they'd like to be able to take into account the reserves they can't extract yet, but will be able to once we realize zero-point energy, or perhaps fusion. As time goes to infinity the UER must get pretty darn big! ;)
"Humankind cannot gain anything without first giving something in return. To obtain, something of equal value must be lost. "
User avatar
pilferage
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 553
Joined: Sun 21 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: ~170ft/lbs@0rpm (on my bike)

Unread postby Lehyina » Fri 25 Feb 2005, 00:36:25

I agree with BP.
The SEC rules mandate the reporting of proved reserves and do not allow the reporting of proved plus probable reserves.
When new reserves were easy to find the oil companies were able to report 'proved reserves replacement ratios' of greater than 100% which is what shareholders want to see.
Now because reserves are harder to find the 'proved reserves replacement ratios' are slipping below 100% so the oil companies want to be able to switch to reporting a 'proved + probable' reserves replacement ratio. This might fool some investors and help create an illusion that reserves replacement has not become harder.
User avatar
Lehyina
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 101
Joined: Wed 12 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Unread postby pip » Fri 25 Feb 2005, 14:05:35

You have to give the oil companies the benefit of the doubt on this issue. What are the odds that the government(SEC) has any idea what they're doing?
The road goes on forever and the party never ends - REK
User avatar
pip
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 480
Joined: Wed 21 Apr 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Republic of Texas

Unread postby BabyPeanut » Fri 25 Feb 2005, 14:23:09

pilferage wrote:You see, they'd like to be able to take into account the reserves they can't extract yet, but will be able to once we realize zero-point energy, or perhaps fusion. As time goes to infinity the UER must get pretty darn big! ;)

The #ucking SEC! They are way too reality based! Don't you realize that in a few years we will be powered by numbers on a computer screen?
BabyPeanut
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3275
Joined: Tue 17 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: 39° 39' N 77° 77' W or thereabouts


Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 261 guests