mustang19 wrote:
Instead of your pointless, liberal existence why not post on my blog?
Where's your blog?
mustang19 wrote:
Instead of your pointless, liberal existence why not post on my blog?
Gmark wrote:mustang19 wrote:
Instead of your pointless, liberal existence why not post on my blog?
Where's your blog?
JuanP wrote:Shouldn't Mustang19 be moderated or blocked? He is ruining the site with his nonstop nonsense posts. He just made my foes' list. Bye, bye Mustang!
Three decades ago, when I researched the impact of the flooding along the North Wales coast, major floods were regarded as “once in a thousand year” events. Since then, we have been subjected to a growing number of incidents in which large scale torrential rain inundates a relatively small geographical area. The Boscastle flood of 2004 was a particularly nasty example in which seven inches of rain fell on the high ground above the village in a little over an hour. However, smaller but increasingly frequent floods of a similar kind have brought British cities to a standstill on several occasions – most recently in London this weekend. As Ivana Kottasová at CNN reports:
“When two London hospitals turned non-emergency patients away after getting flooded over the weekend, it was a brutal reminder that even some of the world’s richest cities are dangerously unprepared for the kind of extreme weather that is becoming more common and more severe because of climate change.
“Climate and infrastructure experts have been warning for years that London, like many other large cities, isn’t ready for climate change, with large parts of the city built on a flood plain and a Victorian drainage system that is unable to withstand this kind of intense rain.”
dissident wrote:Deniers wallow in correlation is causation claims. For example, if they find a regression fit of some surface temperature variation with galactic cosmic rays (GCR) or orbital resonances (AHR) that modulate the amount of interplanetary dust (IDP) loading in the upper atmosphere, in a time window short relative to the period of the variation, then they assert that they have an explanation of the temperature variation. They do not establish any actual mechanism. They just make bald faced claims that what they want to believe is the true and only explanation.
For both GCR and IDP loading via AHR, the purported impact on cloud albedo not only fails to even correlate after the 1980s, but the amount of cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) involved is absurdly low. The background sulfate aerosol loading in the lower troposphere is two orders of magnitude larger than any CCN induced by GCR ionization or which manages to descend from above 100 km without being coagulation scavenged on the way by existing aerosol (which is the seed for CCN). There is likely more impact on the troposphere from changes in the stratosphere associated with IDP variation. But none of this explains the multi-decade and longer time scale variations of the surface temperatures driven by the ocean dynamics which exhibits such time scales. A better use of regression analysis with physically plausible precursors such as dynamical features of the oceans and the atmosphere also produces high confidence correlations. At least these correlations have underlying physical processes that explain them.
The insect apocalypse is only a leading indicator of what is already a larger disaster for much of humanity and is now beginning to hit the wealthy world (the US and Europe) hard.
Climate change from man-made global warming is here in a way that even fossil fuel billionaires and their paid shills can no longer deny. For the moment, we still — probably — have the ability to determine how bad it’s going to hit us.
We long ago passed the point where we could decide if we were going to let it make our lives miserable. We’re there. In all probability we passed that tipping point several generations ago, when fossil fuel companies and climate scientists were just arriving at a consensus that it was not only real but could be deadly to human life on this planet.
The response of the fossil fuel industry was to follow the tobacco industry’s playbook and fund phony research, create deceptive think tanks and push out highly paid front men and politicians to lie to the American people and the world.
The question now is whether we’ll let our current climate emergency get so far advanced it either wipes out the human race along with most life on the planet; produces such chaos it tears apart civilization; or merely disrupts human life so severely it crashes governments around the world and stresses the ability of democracies like ours to continue to function.
Our response in the next few years will decide our fate.
jawagord wrote:Another year gone and 2016 remains the peak temperature anomaly.....
jawagord wrote:How many years of non-records before we say the earth has stopped warming? When does the IPCC admit the climate models are over predicting temperature rise?
jawagord wrote:The average global land and ocean surface temperature for January–November 2021 was 0.84°C (1.51°F) above the 20th century average of 14.0°C (57.2°F), the sixth warmest such period on record.
dissident wrote: But denier rubbish is based on cherry picking of data and outright lying. In other words, politics as normal.
From dangerous heat and destructive wildfires to record breaking rainfall and catastrophic flooding, parts of British Columbia, Canada have been at the epicentre of two top-end weather extremes within the space of a few months.
British Columbia (and the US Pacific Northwest) suffered one of the most ferocious heat waves in recorded history in June 2021. Only a few months later in mid-November 2021, enormous rainfall totals piled up in British Columbia due to a multi-day significant atmospheric river event, which led to historic rainfall totals and catastrophic flooding. A national state of emergency was issued for British Columbia.
First, came the heat...
The infamous heat dome started breaking national all-time records in British Columbia on the 27th of June. The old Canadian national heat record stood strong since July 1937 (45.0°C), only to be beaten on three consecutive days at Lytton, BC to take the new all-time national heat record for Canada to a staggering 49.6°C on 29 June 2021.
To beat a long-standing national heat record by nearly 5°C is simply outrageous.
In British Columbia, climate change is no longer something abstract for the future. The late June heat dome event—that claimed 500-600 lives—and the wildfires that followed confirm that climate change is a clear and present danger that’s not going away any time soon.
As of September 28, some 867,000 hectares of land had burned, making 2021 one of BC’s worst ever wildfire seasons. The record is 1.35 million hectares burned in 2018, which came on the heels of 1.2 million hectares burned in 2017. Prior to 2000, wildfires simply did not happen at this scale
How many years of non-records before we say the earth has stopped warming?
FamousDrScanlon wrote:British Columbia at the epicentre of climate change-fuelled weather extremes
Return to Environment, Weather & Climate
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests