Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Fuel economy is overestimated on all

Discussions of conventional and alternative energy production technologies.

Fuel economy is overestimated on all

Unread postby uNkNowN ElEmEnt » Fri 04 Nov 2005, 15:36:00

Consumer reports says the fuel economy is overestimated on all
veh's. Some get as much as 40 pct. less mpg.

On every new vehicle, manufacturers are required to list how many miles you can expect to get per gallon of gas. Carmakers are allowed to make these claims based on a government test at the Environmental Protection Agency in which vehicles are put on a treadmill-like device called a dynamometer. The tester watches a computer screen to determine how much to accelerate and when to brake so each vehicle is tested in exactly the same way.

But just how accurately does a test on a dynamometer reflect the mileage you get on the road? Not very, says David Champion, Senior Director of the Auto Test Department at Consumer Reports. According to Champion, manufacturers optimize their cars in order to get the best results they can on EPA tests. "That isn't always what you're going to get in real life," says Champion.
User avatar
uNkNowN ElEmEnt
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2587
Joined: Sat 04 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: perpetual state of exhaustion

Re: Fuel economy is overestimated on all

Unread postby BabyPeanut » Fri 04 Nov 2005, 15:40:08

BabyPeanut
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3275
Joined: Tue 17 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: 39° 39' N 77° 77' W or thereabouts

Re: Fuel economy is overestimated on all

Unread postby eastbay » Fri 04 Nov 2005, 15:47:49

The page you are looking for cannot be found.


I own an '05 Honda Civic with an EPA estimate of 38 mpg hwy. I filled it last night and went 602 miles on 13.25 gallons getting 45.5 mpg. It's about what this car always gets. Yes, EPA figures are off a bit... and happily so for my ride. :-D
User avatar
eastbay
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7186
Joined: Sat 18 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: One Mile From the Columbia River

Re: Fuel economy is overestimated on all

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Fri 04 Nov 2005, 15:55:55

eastbay wrote:The page you are looking for cannot be found.


I own an '05 Honda Civic with an EPA estimate of 38 mpg hwy. I filled it last night and went 602 miles on 13.25 gallons getting 45.5 mpg. It's about what this car always gets. Yes, EPA figures are off a bit... and happily so for my ride. :-D
It's so rare these days when people pay cash for their new cars! Smart, too. The best I could do when I got my '03 was to go for four years of payments. I'll own it in two years - right about when the gas stations run dry, probably. :cry:
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There

Re: Fuel economy is overestimated on all

Unread postby eastbay » Fri 04 Nov 2005, 16:17:42

... oops, I meant to say, the car MY BANK OWNS... lol.
User avatar
eastbay
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7186
Joined: Sat 18 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: One Mile From the Columbia River

Re: Fuel economy is overestimated on all

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Fri 04 Nov 2005, 17:26:33

eastbay wrote:... oops, I meant to say, the car MY BANK OWNS... lol.
Yeah, the so-called "ownership" society is a joke. It's more like the "debtor" society. So what happens if the masses can't pay the bills any more? Or let's say, what happens if the default rate just starts climbing and climbing until the banks are hurting so bad, the stockholders are screaming bloody murder, profits are long gone, equity vanishes like it was never here (it wasn't anyway), and TRILLIONS AND TRILLIONS of dollars are gone forever?
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There

Re: Fuel economy is overestimated on all

Unread postby Frank » Mon 07 Nov 2005, 20:20:17

The mileage discrepancy is well known but politicians are afraid to touch it, IMO. The test cycle uses lower speeds and acceleration rates than commonly used and actual mileage isn't measured - it's calculated from exhaust emissions. To top it all off the penalty for noncompliance is trivial so there's not much motivation to improve things.

That is to say, up to now. Ford and GM are being hammered and IMO because they got greedy. Lots profit on SUV's and trucks.
User avatar
Frank
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 556
Joined: Wed 15 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Maine/Nova Scotia

Re: Fuel economy is overestimated on all

Unread postby WisJim » Mon 07 Nov 2005, 21:45:08

I have usually gotten mileage as good or better than the EPA figures for the cars that we own. Currently our 1992 Chevy Geo Prizm gets 40-42 on the hiway, 25 to 30+ in town, and my 1998 Ford Ranger (2wd, 4cylinder, 5spd) gets 22 to 25 in town, and up to 30+ on the hiway. Of course, we make an effort to drive smoothly and we work to get good mileage, but we also keep up with traffic on the interstate, and do our share of passing other cars.

I think the driving style makes a BIG difference.
User avatar
WisJim
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 1286
Joined: Mon 03 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Location: western Wisconsin


Return to Energy Technology

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests

cron