Cog wrote:The Democrat's aren't partisan? Haha ok chief.
asg70 wrote:God forbid they don't bend the knee for him as if he's Emperor.
Ibon wrote:asg70 wrote:God forbid they don't bend the knee for him as if he's Emperor.
The bend on both knees to perform figurative oral sex on Trump on a daily basis.
Have they no dignity?
Ibon wrote:asg70 wrote:God forbid they don't bend the knee for him as if he's Emperor.
The bend on both knees to perform figurative oral sex on Trump on a daily basis.
Have they no dignity?
careinke wrote:When you have no real case, resort to obscene slander.
jedrider wrote:careinke wrote:When you have no real case, resort to obscene slander.
I wouldn't say they have 'no real case'. They may 'lose' the case, but not because it is not real, but because it is a power play, pure and simple.
It is profoundly interesting that acquittal will certainly enlarge the scope of the Presidency and diminish (yet again) the Congress. Our constitutional system is devolving to a system of power and leverage, without any element of bipartisanship (nor principle). The tides will turn.
I heard this, more or less, on the radio if anyone is wondering, except for the part about the tides turning.
careinke wrote:jedrider wrote:careinke wrote:When you have no real case, resort to obscene slander.
I wouldn't say they have 'no real case'. They may 'lose' the case, but not because it is not real, but because it is a power play, pure and simple.
It is profoundly interesting that acquittal will certainly enlarge the scope of the Presidency and diminish (yet again) the Congress. Our constitutional system is devolving to a system of power and leverage, without any element of bipartisanship (nor principle). The tides will turn.
I heard this, more or less, on the radio if anyone is wondering, except for the part about the tides turning.
I was kind of hoping this whole thing would spur the congress to take back some of their power that they surrendered to the executive. The patriot act, the war powers act, come to mind off the top of my head and I'm sure there are others.
careinke wrote:I can't figure out why they can't say who the whistleblower is? Is there a court order or something??
jedrider wrote:careinke wrote:When you have no real case, resort to obscene slander.
I wouldn't say they have 'no real case'. They may 'lose' the case, but not because it is not real, but because it is a power play, pure and simple.
It is profoundly interesting that acquittal will certainly enlarge the scope of the Presidency and diminish (yet again) the Congress. Our constitutional system is devolving to a system of power and leverage, without any element of bipartisanship (nor principle). The tides will turn.
I heard this, more or less, on the radio if anyone is wondering, except for the part about the tides turning.
Cog wrote:It's all over except for the Democrat crying over the witnesses they won't get and the acquittal that Trump richly deserves.
If I were Trump the next communication I had with a foreign leader would be in person or by courier. Too many Obama holdovers listening in and leaking.
Oh and court-martial Lt Colonel Vindman and imprison the fake whistleblower who is actually a DNC spy.
careinke wrote:I can't figure out why they can't say who the whistleblower is? Is there a court order or something??
evilgenius wrote:Cog wrote:It's all over except for the Democrat crying over the witnesses they won't get and the acquittal that Trump richly deserves.
If I were Trump the next communication I had with a foreign leader would be in person or by courier. Too many Obama holdovers listening in and leaking.
Oh and court-martial Lt Colonel Vindman and imprison the fake whistleblower who is actually a DNC spy.
What's next, that militaristic type of country where no one who has ever held power can retire? You sound like you are the one who ought to move to Russia.
Return to North America Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 38 guests