onlooker wrote:Well, Ennui, you seem to have some generic bias against any idea you perceive to be "tinfoil".
ennui2 wrote:onlooker wrote:Well, Ennui, you seem to have some generic bias against any idea you perceive to be "tinfoil".
Yeah, that bias is a functioning brain capable of critical thought.
Alfred Tennyson wrote:We are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.
onlooker wrote:Absolutely true Tanada. That is why nothing can take the place of sound factual empirically arrived at data. This kind of data is much less open to critique than other more subjective data like you guessed it perceived tinfoil data.
Alfred Tennyson wrote:We are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.
Tanada wrote:It is the way human brains work, if an idea seems out there but agrees with your own opinion you will see it as being possible even if you think it is unlikely. A person who does not have your same bias will see the exact same theory and say it is "tinfoil" way too far out to be worth considering.
onlooker wrote:can we find any unimpeachable evidence that either confirms or discounts that we were visited by Aliens in our remote past.
Return to North America Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests