Pops wrote:I think forward markets are good, they add liquidity and predictability, both are beneficial. I don't mind the gamblers (as long as they are playing with their own chips)
What I don't know is at what level the position limits should be set. Should they be somewhere around the same number of deliverable contracts? 10 time as many? 100? 1,000?
Great question, but it is like the argument about fractional reserve banking. Some people think banks should only be able to lend a small amount of the money deposited in their institutions, others think it should be virtually unlimited.
I think forward markets should be closely tied to physical markets, maybe say twice as many contracts as physical contract, but some insist it should be effectively unlimited.