I know I'm a dinosaur, Baha, but my point is that this is mature technology, and the system I show above has been producing power nearly 2 decades with only one failure, which never really failed. The vendor warned me that a fan in one of my components was likely to fail and sent me a new one with simple video instructions as to how to replace it. I think that was 13 years ago.
Another thing I'll point out is that we are totally off the electric grid and you are not. In the event of a component failure, it looks like you have the luxury of switching to grid power since your entire system will be down until repairs can be made. My system is modular and has 3X redundancy, which means I will likely only lose part of my production at any one time, while the rest of the system (any one third) can power critical system like refrigeration. The only single point of failure is the battery, and, in my experience, lead-acid batteries give plenty of warning before they fail entirely.
BTW: My monitoring software will sound an alarm if there is a problem. I'll eventually add on the Outback Flexware system which will also alert me via an app or text, but have been quite happy with the Right-Hand Engineering software I've been using for years.
Nothing special or new about your internet-based monitoring except that it is reliant upon a highly complex system called the internet, that you don't control. You are also a customer of Duke Energy or at least have a relationship with them; something I'm not interested in at all.
So there are trade-offs with both systems, eh, and my system likely paid its carbon bill years ago. I'm sure most gridweenies would opt for something like you have, but it isn't for me. If I were to install a similar system to the one I have today, it would look more like this:
Not so different from what you show. I would want two for redundancy, and an Iron-Edison battery set. A lithium battery, but for a bit of luck, could have burned my house down a couple of years ago.
I'm betting that without early adopters like me, the industry wouldn't be as far along as it is, but I could be wrong. Either way, my system remains one of the best investments I've ever made, and I don't need some tech to come around to fix it. That was always my goal. Most of you will remain utterly reliant upon the hyper-complex off-site systems that you always have been.
Companies like Outback, Trace (now Schneider), Mindnite, Magnum, etc., have been around a long time with proven remarkable reliability, while Tesla is a bit late to the party. I'll keep dancing with the ones that brung me.
And I'm not convinced Tesla will be around, considering it still hasn't made a profit. Again, I could be wrong.