>1.Stopping all fossil fuel power stations throughout the world:
That would quickly cause loss of life.
Why do you want to stop greenhouse gas increases anyway? They are very good for the biosphere. The clue is in the name.
Greenhouse gases. CO2 warms the planet, and feeds the starving plants. It's no coincidence the rainforrests are in the tropics, - most heat, most water ( greenhouse agent ). And no coincidence that the most lifeless place on earths are the poles.
Pump the stuff out the best we can, every extra ppm is a godsend.
>4.Implementing nuclear fission power stations:
The world no.1 nuclear state, france, has an excellent track record in cheap power, human health, living standards and low pollution. Other 1st world states without nuclear power lag behind france. When you consider the french spend all there time having extra marital affairs while getting through 40 cigs a day, that's makes their nuclear plant benifits all the more impressive. Also, thorium reactors are known to be better than uranium, with 100s of years of world supply in reserve.
If experience is anything to go on ( yes it is ), then the more nuclear power plants, the better.
>7.Encouraging biofuel production
It's a shocking joke of a waste of farm land and fuel. To get 1 barrel of bio fuel out of a farm, 2 barrels of mineral fuel are needed.
>12.Stopping short-haul air travel:
Yes, lets get those intercontinental magnetic levitation trains going. It would be far more efficient.
>21.Encouraging energy research:
The technology for a cheap and plentiful source of energy for all is already here. It's the powers that be, who're preventing the installation of power outlets and who don't want to set energy free. They prefer it when they've got a monopoly with which they can ration out energy as suits them.
Watch this devil.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FOLkze-9GcI