pstarr wrote:vtsnowedin wrote:https://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/hist/LeafHandler.ashx?n=pet&s=mgfrpus1&f=a
why you even post stuff like that is beyond me? Besides a violation of the site COC . . . it merely shows an ever-increasing measure (40 million barrels) of a particular liquid, gasoline. Is your argument that gross production increases of liquids will continue forever? If so, that's deluded. An attempt to disprove ETP . . . then lame.
Your graph neglects fuel used to drill wells and truck/train Bakken tight shale. That is a net-loss of transport fuels. The economy ends. That's what counts. Your post is a violation, and a waste of time and carbon emissions.
donstewart wrote:@ all doomers
The ETP model remains the best explanation I see for what we can observe in the current events in the world.
Alfred Tennyson wrote:We are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.
pstarr wrote:
That makes sense, as other retired peak-oil threads are also in the current events section such as "Weekly Petroleum Supply Reports 2014' and 'Refinery News'
But on the other hand . . . ETP shares valuable real estate with "Fake Blond News" and "Chuck Berry RIP 3-18-2017" lol
Cog wrote:Too bad we don't have a conspiracy theories sub-forum to put it in.
Return to Peak oil studies, reports & models
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 74 guests