NEW! Members Only Forums!

Access more articles, news & discussion by becoming a PeakOil.com Member.
Register Today...
It's FREE!


Login



Peak Oil is You


Donate Bitcoins :-)


Peak What?/ The Future is Electric.

Discussions about the economic and financial ramifications of hydrocarbon depletion.

Re: Peak What?/ The Future is Electric.

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Fri 25 May 2012, 20:02:09

This isn't the EV thread, though I can see the relevance, the EV is not necessarily central to discussions of moving beyond oil. I think the car has been iconized beyond sanity. Restructuring based on a combination of/ urbanization, open source grid feed systems, efficiency across the board. Much lighter, smaller vehicles, much shorter commutes, less people actually leaving the home to work, etc etc. These are what I see movement towards, which will eventually lead to another peak in resources more inescapable than peak oil. Copper, lead, rare earths.
SeaGypsy
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4792
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 03:00:00

Re: Peak What?/ The Future is Electric.

Unread postby AgentR11 » Fri 25 May 2012, 21:28:42

pstarr wrote:One might have predicted the thirteen Saturn V moon rockets would someday go on to be the commuter plane of the future. But one would have been wrong.


And yet... stupid spacecraft with wings are being turned into museums, and private, commercial spaceflight via sane capsule and rocket configuration is now a reality.
Yes we are, as we are,
And so shall we remain,
Until the end.
User avatar
AgentR11
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 2909
Joined: Tue 22 Mar 2011, 08:15:51
Location: East Texas

Re: Peak What?/ The Future is Electric.

Unread postby pstarr » Fri 25 May 2012, 22:54:36

AgentR11 wrote:
pstarr wrote:One might have predicted the thirteen Saturn V moon rockets would someday go on to be the commuter plane of the future. But one would have been wrong.


And yet... stupid spacecraft with wings are being turned into museums, and private, commercial spaceflight via sane capsule and rocket configuration is now a reality.
Low earth orbit, dude. Wanna go to the moon and back? Gotta go Saturn V. No other. First stage burn 15 tons-propellant/second. Need much more to get this to Mars for serious mining effort.


Image
Is there an electric version? Would need a long cord.
Our great-great-grandparents burned wood and coal. Our grandparents burned oil. We burn natural gas. Our children will burn their furniture. :badgrin:
pstarr
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 14855
Joined: Mon 27 Sep 2004, 02:00:00
Location: Behind the Redwood Curtain

Re: Peak What?/ The Future is Electric.

Unread postby AgentR11 » Fri 25 May 2012, 23:46:47

pstarr wrote:Wanna go to the moon and back?

And back.... that is the sorry failure of our imagination and will.

Heavy lift is next. Small steps.
Yes we are, as we are,
And so shall we remain,
Until the end.
User avatar
AgentR11
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 2909
Joined: Tue 22 Mar 2011, 08:15:51
Location: East Texas

Re: Peak What?/ The Future is Electric.

Unread postby Lore » Fri 25 May 2012, 23:57:57

AgentR11 wrote:
pstarr wrote:Wanna go to the moon and back?

And back.... that is the sorry failure of our imagination and will.

Heavy lift is next. Small steps.


Or just possibly no lift. The fickled finger of fate could just as easily deny any space future. My crystal ball is just as good as yours.
The things that will destroy America are prosperity-at-any-price, peace-at-any-price, safety-first instead of duty-first, the love of soft living, and the get-rich-quick theory of life.
... Theodore Roosevelt
User avatar
Lore
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 4589
Joined: Fri 26 Aug 2005, 02:00:00
Location: Fear Of A Blank Planet

Re: Peak What?/ The Future is Electric.

Unread postby AgentR11 » Sat 26 May 2012, 10:12:28

pstarr wrote:Need much more to get this to Mars for serious mining effort.


Mining on Mars for use not on Mars, or even any significant moon is pointless. It will always take more energy to lift the material than the material is worth.

Asteroids are ok, as long as you aren't in a hurry, and can prospect good candidates without going there, or at least without sending much mass to prospect. Long way off for that, and we'll probably run out the clock and miss the golden ring. Its funny in an electric thread though... one of the most propellant-mass efficient engines is an ion accelerator, which relies on electric power; and for getting a refined bar of Unobtainium back to Earth slowly and cheaply its pretty hard to beat. As long as you don't have any pesky mammals that need carting along too, that is...
Yes we are, as we are,
And so shall we remain,
Until the end.
User avatar
AgentR11
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 2909
Joined: Tue 22 Mar 2011, 08:15:51
Location: East Texas

Re: Peak What?/ The Future is Electric.

Unread postby AgentR11 » Sat 26 May 2012, 10:15:45

Lore wrote:Or just possibly no lift. The fickled finger of fate could just as easily deny any space future. My crystal ball is just as good as yours.


No doubt there. Seems like kinda a long shot at this point, but I like hopeful things sometimes, even when they look to be out of reach.

I just hope we weren't too late in making the thing with wings go away.
Yes we are, as we are,
And so shall we remain,
Until the end.
User avatar
AgentR11
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 2909
Joined: Tue 22 Mar 2011, 08:15:51
Location: East Texas

Re: Peak What?/ The Future is Electric.

Unread postby GoIllini » Fri 01 Jun 2012, 10:35:06

I think we will be running on natural gas for the next ~30 years.

The big question is whether we will build an infrastructure built around burning gas in internal combustion engines at 20% efficiency or burning gas at power plants at 45% efficiency (losing 5% in grid and electric motor losses) and powering your car off of that. Hybrids can connect to catenaries above or electrical rails in the roadbed, and run off of utility-supplied electricity at 20 cents/kwh instead of their own on-board gasoline engine (generator) at 6 kwh/gallon.

If we do that, we will put a lot more optionality into the system. When we run out of natural gas, we can disconnect the natural gas plants from the grid and stick a Gen II Fission plant in its place, or better yet an LFTR, fusion reactor, or solar plant. We don't need to know what the energy technology will be yet- just that there will be something. And we get twice as much propulsion out of the same natural gas by burning it using the power plant's 100MWe combined cycle turbine rather than using something less efficient that can fit under a car hood.
User avatar
GoIllini
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 766
Joined: Sat 05 Mar 2005, 03:00:00

Previous

Return to Economics & Finance

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests