by Outcast_Searcher » Sun 20 Mar 2016, 13:06:13
Clearly corporations are efficient makers of stuff we want, including innovative stuff. If the electric car (or even better the fully autonomous electric car) becomes the mainstay of our private transportation technology in, say, the next couple of decades, I'm certain it will be due corporations like Tesla and Google, NOT because of establishment politics. And as someone getting older, the possibility of the automated car freeing me to get out and about with safety, ease, and confidence long after I would prefer not to drive is enticing indeed).
OTOH, people are quite adaptable and now that I'm retired and have more time to think (vs work 80 hours a week), I'm not at all convinced the stuff we have and want is as important as the ideas we share (and argue about), in terms of happiness or shaping our mindset.
To me, making a new friend who shares enough values and interests with me that our friendship grows, or finding a new author who's stuff I love (and thus becomes a new virtual friend) is a FAR more exciting and meaningful thing than any material possession (beyond the basics of food and shelter, of course. I do recognize the validity of Maslow's Hierarchy).
OTOH, as a career lifetime deep-in-the-weeds mainframe computer geek, I realize the value of technology in terms of dealing better with information, and the power this brings to understanding. For me, the spreadsheet was what a hammer and nails must be to a carpenter, in terms of fundamental power to analyze complex information. (I used to joke that if I were God, the world would look like a spreadsheet).
So maybe the key thing is that corporations are great builders of better TOOLS, and humans can use those tools to enhance the truly important experiences in their lives. (And of course that's all nice, as long as we refrain from acquiring so many toys we destroy the biosphere in the process. Otherwise, not so much.)
Given the track record of the perma-doomer blogs, I wouldn't bet a fast crash doomer's money on their predictions.