Register

Peak Oil is You


Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)


Page added on February 18, 2012

Bookmark and Share

Why $200 oil is the subprime mortgage of energy

Why $200 oil is the subprime mortgage of energy thumbnail

What does an oil price shock have to do with subprime mortgages? Well, consider this: the global economy found itself on the edge of the abyss in 2008 when reality — in the form of wildly overvalued mortgage securities — landed hard on the illusion that real estate-related investments were a guaranteed, perpetual cash machine.

So what do you think might happen when a different reality — in the form of wildly undervalued eco-services and energy-related externalities — comes crashing down on the illusion that there’s no need to steer away from business as usual in an increasingly resource-strained world?

The fallout could be severe, considering there are a lot of wildly undervalued eco-services and energy-related externalities that many businesses today aren’t considering, according to Generation Investment Management, the sustainable investment partnership founded in 2004 by former Vice President Al Gore and David Blood.

In a new report titled “Sustainable Capitalism,” the Blood-and-Gore-led research team warns that such businesses, and even entire business sectors, could quickly find themselves unprofitable if it suddenly became clear just how valuable those undervalued services and externalities are. The risk, the paper states, lies in “stranded assets” … business assets that could dramatically lose value if, say, the true price of carbon dioxide emissions were taken into account on a company’s bottom line.

“Scenario analysis done by (human resources consulting firm) Mercer’s responsible investment team has shown that climate risk poses fundamental challenges to strategic asset allocation by investment funds and that by 2030 climate change related risk that is currently not diversified away could cost investment funds US$8 trillion,” the report notes. “Not pricing in material risks to an investment — government regulated or not — is simply unwise.”

The same logic also applies to the potential impact of peak oil and/or skyrocketing oil prices … not that they’re cheap at the moment. We’ve seen once that a dramatic upswing in the price of crude has the power to nudge an already-troubled economy over the edge. Businesses that don’t take a potential repeat into account are, to put it mildly, playing with fire.

The “Sustainable Capitalism” report also blames the business-as-usual approach to stranded investments for the overt (and covert) pushback against sustainability by companies with the most to lose:

“Stranded assets also have the potential to result in significant reductions to the long-term value of entire sectors as business models could be made obsolete if wholesale transitions to sustainability were implemented,” the paper states. “As a result, there are many people currently in those businesses who feel that they have an interest in maintaining the status quo or, at a minimum, advocating that any transition to more sustainable models be pursued as gradually as possible through slow, incremental changes.”

(Hmm, any reason we’re suddenly reminded of the Heartland Institute’s recently leaked climate memo package, which reveals — among other things — that the organization’s anti-climate strategies have received financial or material support from a number of global corporations and one major anonymous donor with very deep pockets?)

The Generation Investment Management paper lays out several recommendations for making the transition to sustainable capitalism by 2020, concluding, “The barriers to mainstreaming Sustainable Capitalism are formidable but not insurmountable … Incremental change will prove insufficient to mainstream Sustainable Capitalism by 2020. So, like an artist at the easel, our goal is not to make superficial touch-ups that conceal deep structural flaws beneath. We are calling for a fresh canvas on which, together, we can paint a new picture of our future.”

 Greenbang



6 Comments on "Why $200 oil is the subprime mortgage of energy"

  1. Plantagenet on Sat, 18th Feb 2012 6:49 pm 

    The last thing the world is going to be worried about when oil hits $200/barrel is “undervalued eco-services”

  2. Kenz300 on Sat, 18th Feb 2012 8:37 pm 

    Quote – ” We’ve seen once that a dramatic upswing in the price of crude has the power to nudge an already-troubled economy over the edge. Businesses that don’t take a potential repeat into account are, to put it mildly, playing with fire.”
    ———————–
    Individuals, business and politicians need to develop a plan to deal with high energy prices and shortages of supplies.

    Seems like gas in the US will be $4 or $5 a gallon this summer. That will be enough to push a lot of consumers over the edge.

    Too few people are prepared for higher energy prices.

  3. Gale Whitaker on Sat, 18th Feb 2012 11:29 pm 

    Higher gasoline prices are a blessing in disguise. The conservatives won’t let us slow consumption with new taxes so the higher prices will do the trick. No one in power will talk to the public about peak oil. The only way the public will get the picture is because of an emergency. Hopefully higher prices will cause folks to buy more efficient cars and move closer to work or take the bus. Maybe the government could be convinced to convert some of the 237,000 service stations to CNG. That would be a good temporary fix. We should have elected Michele Bachmann. She promised $2 gasoline.

  4. Mike on Sun, 19th Feb 2012 7:03 am 

    Plantagenet is right. The tighter it gets the less environmental concerns will be considered in planning. Starving, we will eat our seedcorn.

    Unfortunately, Gale, it is not a conservative/liberal issue. It’s a Catch-22 with only one outcome – collapse. Higher prices, higher taxes, lower consumption have no innate solution for the system as-is. Too little, too late. Squeezing the economy will increase unemployment, poverty, even hunger until civil unrest breaks out. Slow decline can turn into rapid and ugly breakdown when people take to the streets – or to their guns.

    Without work and with little food, what will happen in the cities? And how much will that hasten the economic nosedive? If the cities, as transportation hubs, fail, whole industries will idle. It becomes an ugly feedback loop at some point. Cascading failures, economic contraction lead to uprisings of people wanting better, but their very actions contribute to the collapse.

  5. BillT on Sun, 19th Feb 2012 7:51 am 

    Mike, I think you are correct. The end will not likely happen slowly, but as one cascading event over maybe weeks or months instead of decades. Odds are, there will be recoverable oil and natural gas still in the ground when the system to recover them is gone.

    We are, and have been, living on the infrastructure, from mines to finished products, built with the cheap, plentiful resources of yesterday. That same infrastructure cannot exist for long in a shrinking energy world where the energy and resources are neither cheap nor plentiful.

    Chances are, that road in front of your house was built and paved with asphalt made from $20, or cheaper, oil. Now oil is at least $100 and going up. How long do you think they will be able to afford to repave that road with a shrinking tax base? 5 years? 10? Never?

  6. Kenz300 on Sun, 19th Feb 2012 7:58 pm 

    Every spike in oil prices has been followed by a recession. Oil inflation means inflation in the price of everything. Nothing gets grown, manufactured or delivered without the price of oil impacting it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *