Peak Oil is You
Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)
Page added on June 17, 2011
Nuclear Twilight in Europe
It is becoming evident to many that the March nuclear catastrophe at Japan’s six reactor Daichi Fukushima complex has dealt a huge, possibly fatal, blow to the nuclear industry’s hopes of a revival.
A year ago even global warming enthusiasts reluctantly embraced nuclear power as a carbon-free energy generating system, and the industry was ramping up for glory days as a result.
The triple whammy against nuclear power beginning with the 1979 partial meltdown at Three Mile Island, followed by 1986’s Chernobyl disaster and now Fukushima, effectively present a “three strikes and you’re out” call against civilian nuclear energy power generation for the foreseeable future.
That said, with the trillions of dollars already invested in 436 nuclear power plants (NNP) worldwide, according to the International Atomic energy Agency (IAEA), the industry has begun to push back, and “ground zero” is emerging as Europe, not Japan, with the lawyers circling.
In the wake of Fukushima, German Chancellor Angela Merkel announced on 30 May that Germany, the world’s fourth-largest economy and Europe’s biggest, would shut down all of its 17 would abandon nuclear energy completely between 2015 and 2022, an extraordinary commitment, given that Germany’s 17 NPPS Germany produce about 28 percent of the country’s electricity.
If Berlin’s announcement sent nuclear power proponents seating, worse was to follow, as Switzerland is examining a proposal to phase out the country’s five nuclear plants by 2034.
Finally, if any doubts existed about Europe’s commitment of nuclear energy, on 12-13 June in a referendum in which 56 percent of Italian voters participated, an eye-watering 94 percent voted against nuclear power. Following the 1987 Chernobyl disaster, Italy decided to shut down its four NPPs and the last operating plant closed in 1990. Three years ago Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi reversed this decision but after Fukushima Berlusconi announced a one-year moratorium on his plans for new nuclear power plants, intending to restart Italy’s nuclear energy program in 2014. Berlusconi spent the days leading up to the polls challenging the nuclear power measure in court, declaring he wouldn’t vote and suggesting his fellow Italians stay at home too. They didn’t, and Berlusconi’s electoral defeat has ended nuclear possibilities for Italy for the foreseeable future. In 2010, 22.2 percent of Italy’s power came from renewable energy sources. 64.8 percent were from fossil fuels, and 13 percent were imported sources, including French nuclear power. The stinging defeat at the polls is a boon for Italy’s nascent renewable energy industry.
The German nuclear industry has begun to fight back, insisting that its shutdown would cause major damage to the country’s industrial base. Utilities E.ON AG and Vattenfall Europe AG have already announced that they will seek billions of euros in compensation, and RWE AG and EnBW Energie Baden-Wuerttemberg AG are expected to follow soon. Germany’s four nuclear operators have already announced they will stop paying into a government renewables fund, which was set up in September 2010 as compensation for longer nuclear life-spans.
In such an environment, the only nuclear energy growth field currently is lawyers’ fees.
Source: http://oilprice.com/Alternative-Energy/Nuclear-Power/Nuclear-Twilight-in-Europe.html
By John Daly for OilPrice.com
2 Comments on "Nuclear Twilight in Europe"
DC on Fri, 17th Jun 2011 5:34 am
One way governments could avoid costly fights with the nuclear industry to nationalize them. This would of course put all liability on governemt, o wait a mintute, thats the de-facto situation now. So nationalizeing them would just formalize an existing situation. At least that way, the legal threats from the industry would evaporate. Then governemts would free to phase them out as they see fit. What is also interesting is the German Nuke owners will seek billions in compensation. For what exactly? Im going to assume that the german industry is structured like pretty much everyone elses, that virtually all of the funding for the plants came from taxpayers in the 1st place. I wonder how much private capital is actually involved in those plants, probably very little. So there going to sue the government for money that probably was never theres to begin with?
Kenz300 on Mon, 20th Jun 2011 12:19 am
Without government support and limits on liability no nuclear plant would ever be build. The cost of the Fukishima disaster will be enormous. TEPCO is functionally bankrupt. The Japanese government and the taxpayers will be paying for this disaster FOREVER. Chernobyl is looking for a billion dollars for a new containment structure 25 years after the incident. Fukishima is not under control and the poisoning of the air, water, land and food continues today.