GASMON wrote:Ulenspiegel wrote:@Gasmon,
is it really so difficult to get correct data? You are talking nonsense.
Please show us the "correct" data, with sources.
Thanks,
Gas
You started thge discussion without providing sources, therefore, it is a little bit a joke that you request me to do your homework.
Let's start with some of your facts:
1) Germany is a netexporter of electricty, this includes France. And one could add, that Germany exports are more expensive than her imports. This does not support your position. But you have sources that explain this contradiction.
2) Baseload (plus mid load and peak load) is one solution. You do not bring any evidence that this is the only one and the best one. Combination of generators with capacity factors of 20-60% like wind turbines, plus a little bit PV and NG or bio gas in open turbines works too. Fraunhofer working groups simulate a lot and discuss economic impact, where are your sources?
3) You have obviously no clue how much coal is under pressure in Germany, read the stuff of the Transmisiion Net Agency, then come back. You confuse power with energy and obviously do not understand the issue of decreasing FLH of coal power plants.
4) Yes, lignite is very likely the last of the three energy carrieres (uraniaum, hard coal, lignite) that will die. But is that bad when at the same time the overall CO2 release decreases?