Kurt Cobb: Can We Find a Balance Between Economic Growth with Environmental Sustainability?
The perils that threaten the continuity of human civilization are so obvious that it is puzzling that so little is being done to counter these perils. In fact, much is being done to hasten their arrival. Climate change, nuclear war, toxic pollution leading to complete loss of human fertility, solar storms and electromagnetic pulse weapons that could take down the entire electric grid, designer viruses against which none of us have defenses, and energy and resource depletion are just some of the extinction-level risks that we face.
Now, none of these possibilities are certain to wipe out humanity altogether. But they might very well end modern technical civilization and leave behind only a few scattered groups of humans around the globe. And, then there is the recent hoopla about artificial intelligence (AI) taking over the world and extinguishing human beings or, at least making decisions without consideration for whether those decisions will lead to the demise of the human race. What the hoopla actually seems to be about is what people will do with AI, making this an all-too-human disaster rather than merely a technological one.
Given all that is known about these threats, what is stopping human societies from taking definitive action to prevent them? Let me offer a few ideas:
- I have long believed that perhaps one of modernity’s biggest challenges is that we live in complex systems, but we don’t understand them. Those without specialist knowledge may difficulty understanding the threats which emanate from the list of risks above. And, if they do understand them, they may have no way of engaging in the hunt for responses.
- These risks cannot be effectively addressed through individual action. For example, hardening your computer and even your home’s entire electrical system, will not prevent you from losing power in the event of a huge solar storm that knocks out the entire grid. Regarding climate change, even though individuals can make choices that reduce their carbon footprint, they cannot bring about the changes in infrastructure, industry and other people’s habits that will be required to halt climate change.
- The incentives in our current market-based system of finance and economics reward people 1) for doing things that are profitable but which add to our risks and 2) for avoiding costly actions that might mitigate those risks. It is enormously profitable to burn lots of fossil fuels. It’s hard to see how that will slow down and ultimately stop until it is NOT profitable, mostly likely through taxation. Concerning toxic chemicals, the situation is roughly the same. As long as chemical companies can make huge profits selling toxic chemicals and allowing them to escape into the environment, they will do so. To the extent the chemical companies are forced to prevent escape of toxic chemicals into the environment, it is an obligation which they do not wish to bear and which their lobbyists toil daily to undermine.
- Most of the risks cited above and many others may seem to certain people like they just might end up being someone else’s problem in the distant future. Besides the immorality of saddling future generations with extinction-level risks that we could do something about today, there is the obvious problem that the future inevitably—and sometimes quite quickly—becomes the present. For example, climate change is now happening much more rapidly than anticipated in the 1990s when the first attempts at concerted global action were made.
- One often-heard refrain is that technology will address these risks. The speaker of these words usually says them without any irony since he or she seems unaware that most of the extinction-level risks we face are caused by technology to a great degree. Certainly, some technology could help mitigate these risks. But the real discussion we need to have is whether certain technologies are worth the risks.
- Finally, there is the argument that we humans have weathered all sorts of dangers through the ages, and we are still here. There is no denying the resilience of human beings. And, I deem it likely that small bands of humans will survive in the face of whatever catastrophe may befall us. In a near-term catastrophe, whether I or any of those reading this sentence will be among the survivors is problematic. Whether those small groups will survive for very long will depend a lot on what type of catastrophe manifests itself. One that destroys human fertility will obviously lead to the end of the human endeavor. One that merely destroys a lot of humans and leaves others untouched may allow the human experiment to continue for a long time.
As you contemplate these reasons why extinction-level threats seem not to arouse a robust response, you may be wondering if there are ways around these obstacles and attitudes. There are, but collectively we will almost certainly not pursue them on any large scale. As for individuals, I have no good answers except to do what you can where you are and live in hope—not foolish hope, but hope in the small activities we engage in to ready ourselves and others close to us for the unknown future.
By Kurt Cobb via Resource Insights
Chuck on Mon, 1st Apr 2024 9:30 am
It’s refreshing to see an unvarnished summation of the current human situation. Hope and optimism are important but clear eyed vision and an understanding of the current problems facing us collectively is critical to our long term ability not just to survive…but to thrive. Its going to take major changes, in the very near future. We can choose to make those changes voluntarily or have them made for us.
William Thompson on Thu, 20th Jun 2024 11:46 pm
Your writing showcases a remarkable gift for Geometry Dash Wave storytelling, effortlessly transporting readers
webecomewhatwebehold on Fri, 5th Jul 2024 2:06 am
This essay piqued my interest because it provides the reader with important information we become what we be hold and makes a solid argument.
Drift Hunters on Tue, 16th Jul 2024 2:28 am
While acknowledging the challenges, he advocates for individual readiness and practical hope as ways to navigate an uncertain future.
Shaun on Fri, 2nd Aug 2024 12:02 am
People can make choices to lower their carbon footprint like our drywall contractor did, but they can’t initiate the necessary changes in infrastructure, industry, and the habits of others to stop climate change.
basketrandom on Wed, 7th Aug 2024 5:18 am
Economic growth and environmental sustainability can coexist and even reinforce each other through innovative practices and policies. Achieving this balance requires a focus on sustainable development, volley random which seeks to meet the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.
lalisa12 on Tue, 13th Aug 2024 9:40 pm
Thank you for producing such a fascinating essay on this subject fnaf 2. This has sparked a lot of thought in me, and I’m looking forward to reading more.
mina12 mina on Wed, 14th Aug 2024 6:17 am
This is, in my opinion, one of the best posts that you have made. Your work is quite outstanding in both quality and quantity candy clicker 2. I am grateful to you for it.
ivy michael on Wed, 21st Aug 2024 3:28 am
Kurt Cobb’s discussion on balancing economic growth with environmental sustainability is vital. From my perspective, achieving this balance involves integrating green technologies and practices family protection dog for sale into economic planning. Prioritizing long-term environmental health alongside short-term economic gains can lead to sustainable growth that benefits both our planet and our economies.
Sharron Glaspie on Fri, 23rd Aug 2024 6:10 am
Great!!! Thank you for sharing this details. If you need some information about Thai-Massage than have a look here 48U
Kent on Mon, 9th Sep 2024 9:39 am
Glad to check this great information here. carpentry
Anthony on Fri, 25th Oct 2024 3:47 am
The event looks like it would be fun, so I will make plans to go slope run