Peak Oil is You

Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)

Page added on March 26, 2019

Bookmark and Share

Texas Needs 11000 More Miles Of Pipelines


Texas will need an additional 10,950 miles of oil and gas pipelines to accommodate rising production over the years to 2050, an IHS Markit study quoted by S&P Global Platts has suggested.

The Lone Star state is home to three of the most prolific oil and gas deposits in the United States, including the Permian, the Eagle Ford, and the Barnett shale. Gas production from these alone will reach its peak somewhere between 2030 and 2040, at a daily rate of almost 35 billion cu ft before it starts to decline. However, there are not enough pipelines to carry the gas that will be produced in Texas.

The situation is the same in oil. The Texas shale patch is already experiencing problems because of pipeline shortages coming against steadily rising production, with the rise particularly marked in the Permian, where the Energy Information Administration expects the average daily to hit 4.177 million bpd next month. According to IHS Markit, this will further expand to 5.5 million bpd by the middle of next decade.

Since most of the gas produced in Texas is associated gas from oil fields, it’s no surprise that, according to the IHS Markit study, the largest portion of the new pipeline capacity that needs to come on stream to carry the rising flows of hydrocarbons in Texas would be for oil pipelines. These will comprise 47 percent of the total. Another 29 percent of the new pipeline networks would carry gas, the market research firm said, and the rest would be for natural gas liquids.

However, that’s not all. This production growth will spur demand for more processing capacity on the Gulf Coast. Existing refineries would need to be expanded and new ones built, and ports will also need to be expanded to handle the higher export-bound amounts of crude oil and gas heading to world markets.

By Irina Slav for

6 Comments on "Texas Needs 11000 More Miles Of Pipelines"

  1. twocats on Wed, 27th Mar 2019 7:55 am 

    for all the people complaining about renewables not having a good enough EROEI: what about all these pipelines that are going to rust in the earth under-used – literally sunk costs

  2. Peter on Wed, 27th Mar 2019 1:01 pm 

    A waste of taxpayers money.

  3. Robert Inget on Wed, 27th Mar 2019 1:13 pm 

    No financing is available for shale PL’s because of its transitory nature.

    Who in their right mind is gonna finance an OIL
    PL with a life span of 50 years when shale OIL
    poops out in 5 years or less.

    Shale GAS is quite another story. Currently most bi-product of shale oil, natural gas, is being flared. (in fact, way beyond regulations limiting flaring) When all that remains is NG, then and only then will PL’s be built.

  4. Sissyfuss on Wed, 27th Mar 2019 3:49 pm 

    We don’t need conventional oil, we got pipelines.

  5. Shortend on Wed, 27th Mar 2019 9:48 pm 

    So much for zero emissions…

  6. Mark Zirgler on Thu, 28th Mar 2019 11:02 am 

    Piss Poor Planning. What kind of a circus are they running over there?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *