Register

Peak Oil is You


Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)


Page added on June 8, 2019

Bookmark and Share

Oil Shock Model Scenarios

Oil Shock Model Scenarios thumbnail

Many different oil shock model scenarios have been presented over time at Peak Oil Barrel. Information on the Oil Shock Model, originally developed by Paul Pukite can be found in Mathematical Geoenergy. The future is unknown, so future extraction rates from conventional (excludes tight oil and extra heavy oil) oil producing reserves are unknown. Also not known are future oil prices which will affect the amount of tight oil and extra heavy oil that is ultimately produced.

For tight oil I have created three scenarios corresponding to a low, medium and high oil price scenario. Likewise I have created three scenarios for extra heavy oil which correspond to the same low to high price scenarios used for the tight oil scenarios.

The mean estimates by the United States Geological Survey (USGS) for technically recoverable resources in tight oil plays combined with reasonable economic assumptions and data gathered from www.shaleprofile.com are used to model tight oil output. The EIA’s AEO 2018 reference oil price scenario is used for the high oil price case and the low scenario uses the AEO reference price case up to the date when it reaches $70/b in 2017$ and assumes oil prices remain at $70/b for all future dates. The medium oil price scenario is the average of the low and high price cases.
chart/


The high tight oil scenario is lto1 and corresponds to the high oil price scenario, likewise lto2 and lto3 are the medium and low tight oil scenarios respectively and correspond to the medium and low oil price scenarios.

For oil sands I use an oil shock model with 500 Gb of resources discovered initially and it is assumed that development of the resource is very slow with an average time from discovery to a barrel becoming part of producing reserves set at 100 years with a maximum entropy probability distribution used for the statistical spread in the years from discovery to mature producing reserve. The year for the start of the producing reserves being developed is set to 1960 with output starting in 1967, extra heavy oil production data was gathered from papers published by Jean Laherrere for Venezuela and from the Canadian Association of Oil Producers (CAPP) for Canada.

Jean Laherrere for many years used a 500 Gb estimate for extra heavy oil URR, this was recently revised to 215 Gb. I have used 200 Gb for the low estimate, 500 Gb for the high estimate, and 350 Gb for the medium tight oil estimate. Forecasts by CAPP were used as the basis for future Canadian oil sands output through 2035, Venezuelan output is assumed to grow very slowly until 2030 and then roughly follow the path of Canadian oil sands output from about 1000 kb/d to 4000 kb/d over 30 years. It is assumed that Canadian Oil sands output flattens after 2040 and declines after 2050, Venezuela’s output mimics the Canadian output path with a delay of 25 years (peak in 2065 and decline in 2075). The low , medium and high scenarios are created by using low, medium and high extraction rate scenarios where it is assumed that low oil prices result in lower extraction rates and high oil prices result in higher extraction rates due to increased profits.

chart/

XH1 is the high oil sands scenario, XH2 is the medium scenario, and XH3 is the low scenario. The scenarios have URRs of 210 Gb, 350 Gb, and 480 Gb for the low, medium and high scenarios respectively.

chart/

The tight oil and oil sands scenarios are combined into 3 unconventional oil scenarios where
U1=lto1+XH1 = high unconventional oil scenario
U2=lto2+XH2 = medium unconventional oil scenario
U3=lto3+XH3 = low unconventional oil scenario

I define conventional oil as all crude plus condensate (C+C) that is not tight oil or extra heavy oil (API gravity of 10 degrees or less). For my low estimate of conventional resources I use a Hubbert Linearization which results in about 2500 Gb for conventional URR. The USGS estimated about 3000 Gb of conventional oil resources in 2000, I add 100 Gb to this estimate for 3100 Gb for my high conventional oil resource estimate and my medium estimate is 2800 Gb for conventional oil resources.

Using these resource estimates and backdated oil discovery data, a dispersive discovery model can be fit to discovery data, with cumulative discovery modelled to match the low, medium, and high oil resource estimate. An oil shock model can be applied to the discovery model and production data to estimate past extraction rates that correspond with discovery and output data. Future output will depend on future extraction rates from proved producing reserves which are generated by the model assuming stochastic behavior following a maximum entropy probability distribution for the development rate of oil resources. Future extraction rates might increase, decrease, or remain constant. Past behavior shows an increase in extraction rates from 1960 to 1973, a sharp drop from 1979 to 1984 and then a gradual drop from 1985 to 2007, extraction rates have been flat to slowly rising from about 2013 to 2018, but we can only guess at future extraction rates. A conservative guess would assume the extraction rates will remain at 2018 average rates going forward.

The models presented below will use the following convention for labels C1, C2, and C3 denote the high, medium, and low Conventional (C) oil scenarios respectively. Likewise E1, E2, and E3 will denote a high, medium, and low extraction rate scenario respectively, where E1 has extraction rates increasing until a peak in output is reached and then remaining flat after the peak, E2 has constant extraction rates, and E3 has extraction rates decreasing to nearly zero over time. The rate of increase or decrease is matched with the model’s rate of decrease in extraction rate over the 1985 to 2007 period with the extraction rate being gradually increased (or decreased) to this rate (the absolute value of that rate) and then gradually flattened towards a zero rate of change over time.

A model denoted C2E2U2 would suggest URR for conventional resources is 2800 Gb (medium scenario), constant rate of extraction from producing reserves (E2) and a medium URR for unconventional resources (U2) of about 450 Gb from 1967 to 2300.

Below I present 3 models, C1E2U2, C2E2U2, and C3E2U2, the only change being the conventional URR in each of the models with URRs (for C+C) of 3500 Gb, 3200 Gb and 2900 Gb respectively. The high model peaks is 2025 at 88.2 Mb/d, the medium model peaks in 2022 at 85.4 Mb/d, and the low model peaks in 2019 at 83.7 Mb/d with the constant extraction rate assumption.

chart/

As an example of how changes in extraction rate can change the output path we will focus on the medium (C2) model with medium unconventional resources (U2) with all three extraction rate scenarios (E1, E2, and E3).

chart/

The low extraction scenario (C2E3U2) has lower a lower URR of 2600 Gb than the medium and high extraction rate scenarios (URR=3200 Gb). The medium scenario is unchanged from the previous chart, the peak of the low scenario is in 2019 at 83.1 Mb/d and the high extraction rate scenario peaks in 2032 at 90.6 Mb/d.

chart/

High extraction rate scenario with extraction rate on right axis, the low extraction rate scenario is below.

chart/

We often make much of tight oil and oil sands output, but as we show below, they have only a small effect on the peak. We choose the C2E2 model and vary the unconventional scenario from U1 to U3, so we have C2E2U1, C2E2U2 (presented in several charts already), and C2E2U3 in the chart that follows.

chart/

The C2E2U2 Scenario peaks in 2022 at 85.4 Mb/d, the C2E2U3 scenario peaks in 2021 at 84.9 Mb/d and the C2E2U1 scenario peaks in 2024 at 87.1 Mb/d, the URRs vary from 3060 Gb to 3600 Gb, but the output from 2019 to 2060 is affected very little from this difference.

The combination of C1, C2, and C3, with E1, E2, and E3, and with U1, U2, and U3 allows 27 different scenarios to be created.

chart/

I realize this chart is not very readable, the point is to show the spread of the various possible models, there is fairly dense coverage of the envelope from 2019 to 2040. Note the dashed black line which is the average of all 27 scenarios. The ensemble average has a URR of 3000 Gb and peaks in 2023 at 85 Mb/d, the average scenario has a plateau between 84 and 85 Mb/d from 2019 to 2026.

chart/

Chart above shows the range of the scenarios with the dashed lines called out in the title. The high black dashed line is scenario C1E1U1 and the low dash and two dot line is C3E3U3, the middle dashed gray line is the C2E2U2 medium scenario and the red dashed line is the 27 scenario average.

The chart below takes the scenarios sorted from high URR to low URR (through 2200) and then finds the average of the highest 9 scenarios (AVG high), the average of the middle 9 scenarios (AVG med), and the average of the lowest URR scenarios (AVG low).

chart/

The median scenario takes the median of all 27 scenarios at each individual year, it has a URR through 2200 of 2900 Gb, peak output of 86 Mb/d and peaks in 2025, the 27 scenario average has a URR of 3000 Gb, peak output of 85 Mb/d in 2023. For the AVG Med 9 scenarios URR is 3000 Gb, with peak output of 85 Mb/d in 2024. The AVG High 9 scenarios URR is 3400 Gb with peak output of 89 Mb/d in 2028. The AVG Low 9 scenarios URR is 2600 Gb with peak output of 84 Mb/d in 2019.

The next chart sorts scenarios by peak output and then groups by top, middle and low 9 scenarios based on peak output.

chart/

For AVG Med URR is 3000 Gb with peak output of 86 Mb/d in 2024, AVG High URR is 3300 Gb with peak output of 89.5 Mb/d in 2028, and AVG Low URR is 2700 Gb with peak output of 83.5 Mb/d in 2019.

Chart below sorts scenarios by peak year and splits scenarios in 3 groups of 9 from latest to earliest peak year.

chart/

For AVG Med URR is 3000 Gb with peak output of 86 Mb/d in 2023, AVG High URR is 3300 Gb with peak output of 89 Mb/d in 2028, and AVG Low URR is 2700 Gb with peak output of 84 Mb/d in 2019.

As it is not clear which sorting method gives the greatest insight, the chart below takes the average of the 3 methods where AVG Low takes the average of the 3 AVG Low scenarios in the 3 previous charts, the same is done to find an AVG Med and AVG High scenario. The envelope between the AVG low and AVG High scenarios might represent about a 66% probability that World output will fall within that envelope, with perhaps a 17% probability that output might be either above or below the envelope.

chart/

The AVGMed scenario URR is 3000 Gb with peak output of 85.4 Mb/d in 2023, AVGHigh URR is 3400 Gb with peak output of 89.2 Mb/d in 2028, and AVGLow URR is 2600 Gb with peak output of 83.6 Mb/d in 2019.

chart/

The dotted lines are the highest and lowest of the 27 scenarios presented and might represent a 90% confidence interval, so perhaps a 5% probability that output might be higher than the yellow dotted line and about a 5% probability it might be lower than the blue dotted line. The dashed lines may represent a 66% confidence interval with the gray solid line roughly representing the 50/50 line where there is an equal probability output might be above or below that line.

Note that these are subjective probabilities as we have no statistical data on future output. I have simply assumed in the absence of any knowledge of the future that each of the 27 scenarios presented is equally likely. In reality the lowest and highest scenarios are probably less likely than the medium scenarios so this is a conservative assumption.

My best guess for future World oil output in the absence of a major economic crisis in response to peak oil has extraction rates gradually rising from 2025 to 2045, remaining flat until 2050 and then decreasing at a gradually increasing rate. The extra heavy oil scenario that I believe is most likely is 210 Gb with a tight oil scenario of about 85 Gb (these correspond with the XH3 and lto1 scenarios presented earlier.) Conventional oil with the extraction rate scenario I believe most likely has a URR of 2700 Gb, with the World C+C scenario having a URR of 2985 Gb through 2200. Scenario presented in chart below.

chart/

Chart below shows where this “best guess scenario” falls relative to the 27 scenarios presented earlier.

chart/

The best guess scenario peaks in 2026 at 87.3 Mb/d. Output remains on a plateau between 86.5 Mb/d and 87.3 Mb/d from 2022 to 2030 in the “best guess” scenario.  A safer guess for the peak in World C+C output would be 2024 to 2028, if this guess is close to being correct.  A severe recession between starting any year after 2023 would probably mark the peak in World oil output.

peak oil barrel



16 Comments on "Oil Shock Model Scenarios"

  1. Dredd on Sat, 8th Jun 2019 9:43 am 

    The problem is only this big sez Square Bob Sponge Pants (Square Finger ‘Splainin’).

  2. Robert Inget on Sat, 8th Jun 2019 10:33 am 

    Wall St closes doors on Tight Oil

    It’s no wonder. Eight out of Ten small companies are losing money.

    https://www.investorvillage.com/groups.asp?mb=19168&mn=206670&pt=msg&mid=19494513

    Fracking companies are feeling intense pressure from investors to live within their means after years of losing money. Most are still struggling to generate positive returns, a situation now compounded by weak oil prices. The U.S. crude benchmark is down nearly 19% since its April peak to about $54 a barrel Friday, raising the prospect that banks could pull back on companies’ lines of credit, many of which are tied to the value of their oil reserves.

    full article on link.

    Trump seems to think holding down gasoline prices will win favor with his ‘base’.
    Two problems.

    The Presidential election is NEXT year.

    No NOTHINGTrump is being played, as usual, by Putin.

    With true transparency gone from EIA, we have no
    real knowledge as to where almost 50 Million barrels of so called ‘unaccounted’ crude is coming from. (first time in EIA history)

    Meanwhile, all’s quiet on the Western Front.
    Too quiet.

  3. Jojo on Sat, 8th Jun 2019 1:55 pm 

    pretty graphs are pretty

  4. More Davy Sock Puppetry on Sat, 8th Jun 2019 2:26 pm 

    Jojo on Sat, 8th Jun 2019 1:55 pm

  5. Robert Inget on Sun, 9th Jun 2019 8:59 am 

    https://www.investorvillage.com/groups.asp?mb=19168&mn=206751&pt=msg&mid=19495748

    “The per well production in the Bakken keeps trending higher year over year.

    If it were not for longer laterals and improvements in technology, the Bakken per well production would be trending down. But technology does improve so the per well production is improving.

    The Permian has years of improvement in per well production in front of it.”

    (Quotes from Author)

  6. Robert Inget on Sun, 9th Jun 2019 9:15 am 

    As it happens, ONLY the Permian, of all the shale sites produces more oil than gas.
    ONLY the Permian is GROWING production.
    Only the Permian will have three, possibly four pipelines to carry the stuff to markets. (by 2020/2022)

    Still, none of this compares to Ultra Deep Water GOM production.

    Needless to say, “UDW” has an entirely different set of environmental challenges and expense.

    Only mankind can justify losing taxpayer money,
    supporting huge military industrial complex, drilling for oil on a continuing bases. At the same time making life more fun for this set of generations and miserable for their own offspring.

  7. Duncan Idaho on Sun, 9th Jun 2019 11:34 am 

    The Bakken and Eagle Ford are not going to be gaining much.
    It is all about the Permian. But conventional C+C production stopped growing in 2005.

  8. I AM THE MOB on Sun, 9th Jun 2019 1:09 pm 

    Where did clogg go?

    Clogg is on Suicide Watch..

    another right wing incel bites the dust

  9. Outcast_Searcher on Sun, 9th Jun 2019 2:45 pm 

    So there’s lots of FF energy available at a moderate to relatively high cost. And we have improving electrical/green solutions to fall back on, in coming decades.

    And the more expensive oil gets, the better the green solutions will look in comparison, and the faster they will be adopted.

    Now if we can just invent and make practical cost-wise, the Star Trek level tech. needed to effectively mitigate AGW in coming decades, we’re in relatively good shape re energy. (Food, pollution, etc. are a different story).

  10. Cloggie on Sun, 9th Jun 2019 3:02 pm 

    Where did clogg go?
    Clogg is on Suicide Watch..
    another right wing incel bites the dust

    Jesus Christ! Poor Mobby can’t think of anything else anymore than uncle Clogg.

    Sorry mob for abandoning you and leaving you all alone out there, without guidance.

    But geopolitics is a little more interesting. Apparently the Channel is just as interesting as the South China Sea:

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7121879/Emanuel-Macron-warns-Boris-Johnson-39bn.html

    “Emmanuel Macron warns Boris Johnson that if Britain kept £39bn Brexit divorce payment it would be a sovereign debt default with dire consequences for UK economy”

    Tensions building up at both sides of the Eurasian landmass. Exactly as an alt-righter likes to see it.

  11. I AM THE MOB on Sun, 9th Jun 2019 4:22 pm 

    Outcast

    Green solutions have been around forever and they can’t replace fossil fuels..It doesn’t matter the cost..You can’t run a society on intermittent electrical system..

    Now blow me you cocksucker!

  12. I AM THE MOB on Sun, 9th Jun 2019 4:38 pm 

    German boat captain Pia Klemp faces prison in Italy for migrant rescues
    https://www.dw.com/en/german-boat-captain-pia-klemp-faces-prison-in-italy-for-migrant-rescues/a-49112348

    Killing migrants welcome to the new Holocaust!

  13. Cloggie on Sun, 9th Jun 2019 5:14 pm 

    “German boat captain Pia Klemp faces prison in Italy for migrant rescues”

    Welcome to the new Europe. Europe will survive, but America is drowning in hostile migrants. American whitey will beg Europe to bail them out. And we will.

  14. I AM THE MOB on Mon, 10th Jun 2019 11:42 am 

    CLogg

    We are not drowning in migrants..legal immigration is at a 25 year low..And illegal immigration peaked back in 2000 and has declined 80 percent since..And is currently at a half century low..

    You just want an excuse for ‘ethnic cleansing’..Because you are a brainwashed Nazi..Because the rest of normal society rejected you..

    There is no data that supports your lies..

  15. anon on Mon, 10th Jun 2019 2:43 pm 

    guys, i hate to break it to ya, but oil saw its double peak in 2005 and 2008. Net energy probably peaked around the 2005 oil peak. We’re already a decade _post_ peak, just that people expect it all to change overnight and thats not how things work. The whole economy and civilization going increasingly off the rails _is_ the first phase of collapse. we’re already in it.

  16. makati1 on Mon, 10th Jun 2019 6:55 pm 

    MOB, you might want to review this:

    “The Migration Policy Institute (MPI) estimated 11.3 million unauthorized immigrants resided in the United States in 2016. About half of all unauthorized immigrants resided in three states: California (27 percent), Texas (14 percent), and New York (8 percent).”

    https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/frequently-requested-statistics-immigrants-and-immigration-united-states

    “The United States has more immigrants than any other country in the world. Today, more than 40 million people living in the U.S. were born in another country, accounting for about one-fifth of the world’s migrants in 2017.”

    https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/06/03/key-findings-about-u-s-immigrants/

    ~11,000,000 are illegal, but staying and having kids who WILL be considered US citizens. The US is being overrun by low wage workers and welfare recipients. ~800,000 per year. The collapse is gaining speed. lol

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *