Peak Oil is You
Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)
Page added on September 25, 2017
‘Game-Changing’ new research on prolific Permian Basin estimates 60 billion to 70 billion barrels remain
Energy researchers at IHS Markit have completed the first, three-year phase of a massive Permian Basin research project that models and interprets the giant basin’s key geologic characteristics to better estimate its remaining hydrocarbon potential, and initial results indicate the giant basin still holds an estimated 60 billion to 70 billion barrels of technically recoverable resources.
To conduct this new analysis, researchers used the IHS Markit historical well and production database that includes more than 440,000 Permian Basin wells, and a new proprietary software tool that, for the first time, enables them to leverage interpreted formation ‘tops’ data to identify accurate formations for completion intervals on hundreds of thousands of wells. These results significantly alter the understanding of the Permian Basin’s resource potential, according to new analysis from IHS Markit (Nasdaq: INFO), a world leader in critical information.
“When a geologist looks for new oil reserves, we typically go back to geologic targets where we know oil was targeted and produced previously, and in a well file, we call those targets the producing or completion formations,” said John Roberts, executive director, global subsurface content operations at IHS Markit. “This producing formation data is a critical element in assessing and correlating future drilling and production activity, but since that information is highly competitive, many operators have historically under-reported that information, which has created much ambiguity in the data.”
Roberts, along with Prithiraj Chungkham, director of unconventional resources at IHS Markit, co-authored The Permian Basin Interpreted in 3D: The IHS Markit Permian Basin Unconventionals Kingdom Geology Project.
“Using a new technology we developed, we’ve leveraged our proprietary IHS Markit interpreted formation-tops data to identify accurate formations for completion intervals on hundreds of thousands of wells, and the results change the game for this basin and for geologists’ interpretations,” Roberts said. “It has significantly changed our understanding of the extent of many formations in the Permian Basin and the potential of those formations to yield additional hydrocarbons.”
Roberts said the IHS Markit team spent thousands of hours and more than three years building the technology and using it to ‘rigorously and methodically’ update the company’s hundreds of thousands of historical well and production records that cover the Permian Basin’s nearly 100-year history.
“We’re a mix of geologists, private detectives and data scientists who have new tools that now enable us to re-examine the historical data and completely reassess the potential of this mature, giant basin in a 3D model,” Roberts said. “I’m one of more than 60 geologists who have been recording and correlating formation ‘tops’ data for the Permian Basin for over 30 years, so this represents a lifetime of work for many of us, and it’s exciting to finally see the pieces of the puzzle fall into place. For a scientist, it’s like looking through a more powerful microscope and suddenly seeing something clearly for the first time—it is very exciting,” Roberts said.
The Permian Basin, which is a mature hydrocarbon basin located primarily in west Texas and extending into southeastern New Mexico, has produced more than 39 billion barrels (cumulative) of oil since it first began production in the 1920s, reaching a previous production peak in 1973. As conventional oil production in the play declined steadily during the following three decades, many in the industry thought the Permian’s best days were behind it, but unconventional drilling and completion technology changed the game in the 2000s. This advance made possible the extraction of unconventional shale resources that were previously uneconomic to produce, and changed the view of geologists, who, for decades, had bypassed these less desirable targets in favor of conventional reservoirs.
With the onset of horizontal drilling and new completion technology during the past decade, the production decline in the Permian has been reversed and the basin is on track to soon eclipse its previous peak, according to IHS Markit.
“The Permian Basin is America’s super basin in terms of its oil and gas production history, and for operators, it presents a significant variety of stacked targets that are profitable at today’s oil prices,” Chungkham said. “In this analysis, we’ve modeled and interpreted more than 70 formations and benches across the Permian Basin and have delivered them in a work-station-ready 3D format, so Permian operators or new-entrants can fast-forward their analysis. In particular, the tremendous improvement in assigned-producing formations adds significant detail and dramatically changes the views of the basin and our understanding of where future hydrocarbon potential exists, allowing for faster economic evaluation of acreage and productive potential. Based on our IHS Markit analysis, a previously undiscussed opportunity for production may be from the tight, non-continuous plays produced through short-lateral wells and low-volume fracking. This offers lower risk, improved upside potential and ultimately, lower recovery costs, which is good news for operators,” Chungkham said.
Given the concerns about a potential crude supply shortage in the medium term, understanding the economic limits of both geography and geology in the Permian is key for operators and investors, Roberts said. Independently, such in-depth data interpretation and analysis can be extremely time consuming and expensive, which has driven demand for this interpreted, 3D-modeled work-station-ready dataset.
“It enables operators to fast-track their existing interpretation efforts in the play or to enter new parts of the play,” Roberts said. “To our knowledge, this is the most ambitious, comprehensive Permian Basin geologic interpretation analysis and modeling project of its kind to date, but we’re not done yet. We are already at work on the second phase of the Permian Basin analysis, which is to further delineate the various Wolfcamp sub-benches.”
The Permian Basin Interpreted in 3D: The IHS Markit Permian Basin Unconventionals Kingdom Geology Project contains a 3D geological model (IHS Kingdom™) of more than 70 geologic formations (from the Basement to the Upper Permian), built using IHS Markit proprietary interpreted tops data, which has been used to assign corrected producing formations for all producing wells. The project includes more than 440,000 updated wells, the interpreted tops, digital logs and allocated production data. It also contains various analytical data including zone attributes, GRID files and the results of analysis of 52 plays comprised of 11 shale (continuous type) and 41 stratigraphic-structural (non-continuous type). These analyses incorporate PRODFit™ (Producing Formation from Interpreted Tops), a new well-production database enhancement that is just now coming online and is being delivered to customers.
72 Comments on "‘Game-Changing’ new research on prolific Permian Basin estimates 60 billion to 70 billion barrels remain"
mick on Mon, 25th Sep 2017 9:48 pm
I usually read the headline then look at the source of it. don’t bother reading just another sheeple sucker add
makati1 on Mon, 25th Sep 2017 9:55 pm
mick, I do the same. Most are just selling something or is some form of propaganda. It is getting more and more difficult to separate the wheat from the tares.
Boat on Mon, 25th Sep 2017 10:04 pm
Have you researched this months Drilling Productivity report?
The much-talked-about Permian is completing around half the wells it did 3-4 years ago even though production is about 3 times more productive. Technology at work.
mick on Mon, 25th Sep 2017 10:08 pm
yep mak and we will get more and more of these type of articles as we start going over the cliff to stop joe six packs running for the exits. lucky we got out when the doors were still open.
makati1 on Mon, 25th Sep 2017 10:50 pm
mick, I agree. Those doors might be ‘open’ but the places to go might be very limited and the ability ($$$) to do so even prevented.
Anonymouse1 on Tue, 26th Sep 2017 12:07 am
Oh, thank goodness, nascar and wall-mart are safe for future generations.
Still need more convincing? Look, boatietard, one of PO.coms leading experts(cough village idiot), thinks this is a game-changer as well.
GregT on Tue, 26th Sep 2017 1:14 am
“Look, boatietard, one of PO.coms leading experts(cough village idiot), thinks this is a game-changer as well.”
Boat probably thinks that 60-70 billion barrels of oil equivalent is a lot, he isn’t very good at erithmatic.
yoananda on Tue, 26th Sep 2017 3:15 am
“estimated 60 billion to 70 billion barrels of technically recoverable resources”
what was the previous estimates ?
Davy on Tue, 26th Sep 2017 4:55 am
“Boat probably thinks that 60-70 billion barrels of oil equivalent is a lot, he isn’t very good at erithmatic.”
What is “erithmatic” is grehg and anymouse1 thinking the Canadian tar sands are American.
Davy on Tue, 26th Sep 2017 5:05 am
I think I will wait and see what the board oil experts say is behind this article. I am concerned for the truth and not an agendist who is anti-American or anti-oil. Nope, I don’t like oil. I am a tree hugger permaculturalist type but I do like to know the truth good or bad unlike a significant amount of commenters here who want to whine about their emotional agendas. Commenters who act like experts but who are just “nothing specials” can’t stand anything American positive. An article like this is going to upset the natives and they will be parading scalps around the fire. Anything oil positive and American damn that is sacrilegious. Yea, I am whining and I have an agenda and it is you if you fit this description.
coffeeguyzz on Tue, 26th Sep 2017 7:36 am
Boat
This estimate should come as no surprise to anyone even moderately following the developments in the unconventional hydrocarbon industry.
The conservative USGS assessed TRR in the Wolfcamp at 20 billion barrels. This was for the Midland sub basin ONLY, NOT including the much larger Delaware.
The follow up USGS assessment for the Spraberry was 4 billion barrel TRR, also only in the Midland.
The Permian is so vast, the heterogeneous characteristics of well by well, stage by stage developmental learning will – by its very nature – stretch out the timeline for operators to even determine optimal practices.
Added to all that is the continuing evolution of fracturing processes which now involve near wellbore and far field diversion techniques, micro proppants, as well as controlled pressure drawdown and reciprocal enhanced formation pressure via new, nearby fracs.
Bottom line … a Kardashian-sized asston of oil and gas from the many shale resources throughout the country.
GregT on Tue, 26th Sep 2017 9:52 am
“Commenters who act like experts but who are just “nothing specials” can’t stand anything American positive.”
Like burning another 60-70 billion barrels of oil is a ‘positive’.
GregT on Tue, 26th Sep 2017 9:55 am
Especially for somebody who states the following:
“Nope, I don’t like oil. I am a tree hugger permaculturalist type”
Conflicted much?
Davy on Tue, 26th Sep 2017 11:36 am
“Like burning another 60-70 billion barrels of oil is a ‘positive’”
Grehg, it’s called reality not positive or negative. Reality is obviously something you have issues with. You can cry your crocodile tears for the positive or negative of oil and how un-renewable renewables are and be like a wacked out intellectual wannabe. The reality is what “is” and what “is” is 7BIL people that need to be fed and clothed today not in 10 years when your whining might matter. BTW, easy to whine when you are in your secluded Salmon Arm, BC all prepped up. It is easy to tell others how screwed they are when you think you are set.
Davy on Tue, 26th Sep 2017 11:40 am
“Conflicted much?”
Like I said some people can reality test and others are wacked out wannabe intellectuals who whine and moan but say little that is effective because what they say does not reflect reality. Oil is the life blood of too many people to talk like a fake green like grehg talks.
rockman on Tue, 26th Sep 2017 11:41 am
Davy – “I think I will wait and see what the board oil experts say is behind this article.” Ask and ye shall receive. The estimate may be fairly accurate. Or not as any such work done by petroleum geologists might be. First they are saying the PB formations CONTAIN 60 or so billion bbls of oil and some folks are acting like that’s a lot. Well, not compared to the TRILLIONS of bbls of oil CONTAINED in oil bearing reservoirs around the world.
And let’s remember what “PO” represents: a peak in the global oil production RATE and not the volume of resources or reserves in the ground. So maybe in the coming decades the PB will produce 6 billion bbls of oil…or 60 billion bbls…or 600 billion bbls. What f*cking difference does it make?
What is important in how much oil the PB will produce y-o-y in the future and what price oil will be required to generate that production.
Let me give you a hint as to how the Rockman’s company and every other company determines the price it will pay for a producing oil field. First and foremost the ultimate volume of oil the field will produce PLAYS NO ROLE in setting the value. We don’t even spend much time estimating that number. The entire evaluation is based on the projected PRODUTION RATE over just the next 10 years or so. Of secondary importance would be the projection of oil prices over that period. But as a general rule most companies just use the current price for the entire period.
Production based on net present value calculation, beyond 10 or 12 years, has an insignificant value. IOW if a company were looking at buying the entire PB the price would be calculated the same if the URR were 60 billion or 600 billion bbls of oil.
So the Rockman always smiles when he sees such heated arguments: if the URR of the PB is of little importance to the petroleum industry why should anyone else care? IOW no company gives a sh*t what reserves are producible from the PB. They only care what will come from their leases. Which is why as a general rule you see such estimates coming from the USGS et al…companies are not going to waste their time. They have more important things to do…like figuring out where to drill their next well.
The only reason ExxonMobil et al for rebroadcasting those numbers is to blow snake up the asses of potential stock buyers. LOL.
GregT on Tue, 26th Sep 2017 11:43 am
“it’s called reality not positive or negative.”
““Commenters who act like experts but who are just “nothing specials” can’t stand anything American positive.”
You sound confused Davy, make up your mind.
Boat on Tue, 26th Sep 2017 11:45 am
Canadians just can’t read and comprehend oil related information and they blatantly just make up shyt. I never mentioned 60-70 billion barrels or whether the Permian is a game changer or not.
“Permian is completing around half the wells it did 3-4 years ago even though production is about 3 times more productive”.
That comment was about the current productivity vrs 3-4 years ago.
greggiet, you don’t have to be an expert to look at charts, compare data and realize the change. I can do it with a high school diploma. Ask for help, it’s never to late to learn.
GregT on Tue, 26th Sep 2017 12:06 pm
Boat,
What part of “probably” are you unable to comprehend?
And let’s not forget, that it was you who told everyone that 1 billion barrels of oil would supply the globe for years, when in fact, it would last around 11 days. So even if production could be ramped up, and prices were affordable to our economies, ( not creating even more mountains of unrepayable debt), 60 billion barrels of oil would last the planet less than two years, or the USA less than a decade.
GregT on Tue, 26th Sep 2017 12:10 pm
Not a ‘game changer’. Just more CO2 added to the environment. Long term pain, for short term gain.
Davy on Tue, 26th Sep 2017 12:10 pm
“You sound confused Davy, make up your mind.”
No confusing you grehg, you are reality tested.
coffeeguyzz on Tue, 26th Sep 2017 12:15 pm
Rock
Two things …
The above article uses the term ‘technically recoverable resource’ – USGS-speak for what is both known and technically recoverable with today’s technology.
Economics are not taken into account.
Second, and far more significant observation from the article was this …
“…a previously undiscussed opportunity for production may be from the tight, non continuous plays produced through short lateral wells and low volume frac’ing”.
This can apply to eastern Colorado, northeast Ohio where ” little” operators can drill and frac $2 million dollar wells with increasing assurance of success.
Monobore/single run drilling in the Niobrara and Cotton Valley enables D&C costs for 5,000′ laterals to be done for under $4 million.
Essentially, hydrocarbon bearing rock might targeted more and more by smaller operators using 3D seismic, fast drilling, and WAY more productive completions in heretofore marginal plays.
GregT on Tue, 26th Sep 2017 12:16 pm
So which one is it Davy?
Not positive or negative, or American positive?
Maybe if you got your emotional Anti-American agenda out of the way, you might be able to think more clearly.
Nah, probably not.
Davy on Tue, 26th Sep 2017 12:19 pm
“Not a ‘game changer’. Just more CO2 added to the environment. Long term pain, for short term gain.”
Grehg, when you took your shit this morning you added all kinds of things to the environment. Oil supply from anywhere is called survival to a modern global economy. That is something you dismiss as short term gain and unimportant compared to long term pain. What do you know about pain in your secluded little Salmon Arm, BC sitting in your doomstead all prepped up? You could give a shit about all those people who depend on oil to live. For you these people are expendable. You are too busy worrying about a fantasy future that sees a US collapse. You are too busy hoping for millions of Americans to die to free up a few more years of resources for all those billions of Asians you are so fond of.
GregT on Tue, 26th Sep 2017 12:21 pm
“Economics are not taken into account.”
And neither is the most important piece of the equation, the environment.
Cloggie on Tue, 26th Sep 2017 12:30 pm
60 billion barrel/20 million barrel US daily consumption = 3,000 days = 8.2 years
GregT on Tue, 26th Sep 2017 12:32 pm
“when you took your shit this morning you added all kinds of things to the environment.”
I didn’t take a shit this morning Davy. More delusions.
“Oil supply from anywhere is called survival to a modern global economy.”
Oil supply is not going to save the global economy. It is not possible to sustain the unsustainable.
“That is something you dismiss as short term gain and unimportant compared to long term pain.”
Long term pain likely includes global mass extinction. Somewhat important, or do you not think so?
“What do you know about pain in your secluded little Salmon Arm, BC sitting in your doomstead all prepped up?”
As mentioned before, I live at least 8 hours away from Salmon Arm by car. More delusions.
“You could give a shit about all those people who depend on oil to live.”
I give more of a shit about a healthy planet that all of those people will not survive without. Oil is not a necessity for life on Earth.
“For you these people are expendable.”
See last comment above.
“You are too busy worrying about a fantasy future that sees a US collapse.”
US collapse is inevitable, is already well underway, and not just economic.
“You are too busy hoping for millions of Americans to die to free up a few more years of resources for all those billions of Asians you are so fond of.”
I don’t give a shit about imaginary human lines drawn in the sand, and I’m not a racist like you are.
____________________________________________ on Tue, 26th Sep 2017 12:32 pm
The more you burn the better for this uninhabitable shit show. You love living on life support. gaytards
Davy on Tue, 26th Sep 2017 12:52 pm
“I didn’t take a shit this morning Davy.”
Right, I forgot, you are special and don’t have to shit.
“Oil supply is not going to save the global economy. It is not possible to sustain the unsustainable.”
WTF, you think we are doing right here right now? We are sustaining ourselves. We are unsustainable longer term but we still have to eat today. OH, I forgot you don’t shit so I guess you don’t have to eat.
“Long term pain likely includes global mass extinction. Somewhat important, or do you not think so?”
So, Mr. Brilliance instead of long term pain you are saying die now in place to avoid long term pain? That sounds brilliant. I know, we need to rephrase that, Americans need to die so fantasy Asians noble 3rd world’ers can live.
“I give more of a shit about a healthy planet that all of those people will not survive without. Oil is not a necessity for life on Earth.”
Right, you give a shit about a healthy environment because you are set 8 hours from Salmon Arm. I want to hear you say people can live without oil? Right, you believe your noble fantasy 3rd world’ers can live without oil. LOL. What you want is Americans to die to free up resources for your noble 3rd world’ers. IMA, you have a big photo album from your days of touring Asia to prove it. Wow, that was a dirty fake green thing to do grehg. You realize by touring Asia and your trips to Hawaii you shit some CO2.
“US collapse is inevitable, is already well underway, and not just economic.”
Anti-American talk because you do not acknowledge the rest of the world is in collapse.
“I don’t give a shit about imaginary human lines drawn in the sand, and I’m not a racist like you are.”
Bull shit wacko, you are the most nationalistic person on this board and the biggest racist. You are an Asiaphile and strongly anti-American. You ideal turn of events is a collapsed US (with large loss of life) and an Asia in strong growth. (Remember Deagel?)
You are a monster greg who parades around as a good person.
Cloggie on Tue, 26th Sep 2017 1:30 pm
I didn’t take a shit this morning Davy. More delusions.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haarlem_oil
Works wonders during periods of constipation.
GregT on Tue, 26th Sep 2017 2:01 pm
Davy,
The next time you hit rock bottom, you should consider your mental health before getting another cell phone. Your condition continues to deteriorate, just as I predicted that it would a few years back.
Sissyfuss on Tue, 26th Sep 2017 2:06 pm
I know it was a typo, Rocko but blowing snakes up someone’s ass sounds much more heinous to the anus.
GregT on Tue, 26th Sep 2017 2:11 pm
“I want to hear you say people can live without oil? ”
People can live without oil, and survived just fine without it, for at least a couple of hundred thousand years. In less than 300 years, the damage inflicted on planet Earth from the burning of fossil fuels is irreparable, at least in a time frame that matters to the human experience.
If human beings do not curb fossil fuels emissions, the consequences will be horrific. Likely within both your, and my lifetimes.
Davy on Tue, 26th Sep 2017 2:12 pm
Poor widdle grehg, can’t give a response because I pegged him. I love putting a monster in his place. grehg, you are slimy, a stalker, and a prick.
Davy on Tue, 26th Sep 2017 2:20 pm
“People can live without oil, and survived just fine without it, for at least a couple of hundred thousand years….If human beings do not curb fossil fuels emissions, the consequences will be horrific. Likely within both your, and my lifetimes.”
Your brilliance how do you think we are going to leave oil? OH, Yea, I know your answer, with a bunch of dead Americans you and mkat figure you can have a fossil free 3rd world of noble subsistence farmers surviving in idyllic small farms on a healing earth. What a friggen fruit loop. No, we cannot live without oil for years if ever and not see mass death. When we leave oil lots of people will die. Grehg, there are consequences for actions and the consequences for leaving oil is mass death, got that? You don’t even allow renewables a place in this process. For you they are unrenewable so of no use. They are of use grehg in the immediate effort to save lives and mitigate a collapsing world. We are on a sinking ship with or without oil.
GregT on Tue, 26th Sep 2017 2:49 pm
“We are on a sinking ship with or without oil.”
The first law of holes: “When you find yourself in a hole, stop digging.”
The second law of holes: “When you stop digging, you are still in a hole.”
Cloggie on Tue, 26th Sep 2017 3:01 pm
The third law of holes: “When you find yourself in a hole, dig out a staircase sideways”.
#LateralThinking
The fourth law of holes: “Don’t be an *sshole.”
Davy on Tue, 26th Sep 2017 3:03 pm
Third law of holes is once you do law 1&2 then you start digging graves. Grehg, got you pegged brother. You and mkat want Americans to die to make room for your noble 3rd worlders. That is fine grehg but be honest and tell it like it is. Your idea of stopping modernism is on the bodies of millions of Americans. How else do you have this figured out. Surely you are smart enough to realize there are consequences that must be paid. Being an flaming anti-American that means “Deagel” solution. 280MIL American deaths and the impoverishment of the rest is your final solution.
Cloggie on Tue, 26th Sep 2017 3:12 pm
You don’t even allow renewables a place in this process. For you they are unrenewable so of no use.
Greg is afraid that renewables could extend the arrangement of having billions on this planet, therefor he is fighting them tooth and nail. Greg is dreaming of the days before Europeans set foot on the North-America continent, when everything was “beautiful nature”, with millions of bisons, no road’s, no asphalt, no industry, no mall dwellers. The only ones present were Chief Seattle’s tribe and the Kogi. All wise people, living in harmony with nature. Possoms all:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LT9YKjn67Og
makati1 on Tue, 26th Sep 2017 5:42 pm
What an interesting debate! Delusional Davy vs the real world with a bit of tech fantasy thrown in by Cloggie.
At this point, the human species is going down. If you are under 60, you will likely see the grand finale and hear the fat lady sing. Especially if the FSofA Police State brings out the nukes. Then even I might get to witness the end of the human race. I hope not.
Davy on Tue, 26th Sep 2017 5:51 pm
Mkat, where were you all day. Did you sleep in while I slapped you boyfriend silly? I doubt you are going to witness the end of the human race but you will witness your end soon. You are on the last lap being 75 and in a turd world country with no health care.
GregT on Tue, 26th Sep 2017 6:01 pm
Alternate energy will not solve the predicaments associated with population overshoot. The oceans are dying, the forests are being decimated, the soils are being depleted, water insecurity is already problematic, and we continue to add 86 million more people on the planet each and every year.
The human population overshoot predicament is the direct consequence of a surplus of energy. Adding more energy into the mix will not solve the predicaments caused by a surplus of energy.
rockman on Tue, 26th Sep 2017 6:04 pm
Sissy – Snakes up their asses. LOL. Not typo…damn auto correct. Pisses me off worse when it comes up with a word better then my choice.
Coffee – All true. Just thought of shorter way to make my point about debating whatever number is tossed out. And everyone is invited to play. Two scenarios to answer:
A) how much oil will the US be producing in 2030 if the PB has 60 billion bbls of technically recoverable oil reserves?
B) how much oil will the US be producing in 2030 if the PB has only 6 billion bbls of technically recoverable oil reserves?
The prize for the winning answers will be announced later.
GregT on Tue, 26th Sep 2017 6:08 pm
If all three of live out an average lifespan Davy, you and I will both be dead not very long after Makati.
Davy on Tue, 26th Sep 2017 6:18 pm
Wow, that was brilliant grehg. I am amazed you have such depth in your character. I am sure mkat is blushing for you thoughtfulness. You know you are special to him.
makati1 on Tue, 26th Sep 2017 6:30 pm
What an interesting life you have fantasized for me, Davy, You make me older than I am, tell me what I was doing, and on and on. All of which is pure Davy bullshit.
With my good health and genes, I will outlive you by years. You live in a very polluted, stress filled, violent, immoral, greedy, war mongering country. Very unlike where I live. Not to mention your delusions and signs of insanity. I might mention that your kids will likely never even reach your age. THAT is reality no matter how much you deny it.
GregT on Tue, 26th Sep 2017 6:39 pm
“that was brilliant grehg. I am amazed you have such depth in your character.”
Most people would consider that to be obvious Davy, but I fully understand why you’re having such difficulties.You and I will likely both be dead within a decade of Makaki, give or take a few years.
Davy on Tue, 26th Sep 2017 6:41 pm
Mkat, it has me off you ignore list and on your most commented on list plus the added bonus of having your boyfriend spending his time foolishly defending you honor. You can brag to someone else about your health. This is the internet mkat. You are living in a filthy overpopulated city probably not exercising enough. You better watch your back because these days the P police are getting bad about extrajudicial killings. You might get caught in a cross fire. If NK blows up that is bad news for your overpopulated little island. Your economy will stop dead in its tracks along with the rest of Asia. That means food issues for your little part of Asia.
Davy on Tue, 26th Sep 2017 6:44 pm
grehg, so are you saying something meaningful or just being a dork?
GregT on Tue, 26th Sep 2017 6:48 pm
There’s nothing nearly as meaningful as your own death Davy. It is you who is acting like a ‘dork’.