Ibon wrote:Pops, it is not that you have been wrong about assessing Trump. Where you have been wrong is under estimating the depths of the cult like loyalty to a deeply flawed and criminal president.
Cog wrote:I guess Pops has never witnessed left wing rage and virtue signaling run amok. Sad to be so sheltered. How many videos would you like me to post of people being assaulted for the crime of attending a Trump rally by Antifa goons?
Cog wrote:That cult, as you call it, is also going to put the fear into Senate Republicans to keep the from flipping. I estimate Trump's hard core base as about 30% of Republican voters. No Republican Senator can give up that many votes to a Democrat candidate opponent.
Even assuming the House can articulate some crime that Trump committed. Something we have not yet seen.
dissident wrote:Cog wrote:I guess Pops has never witnessed left wing rage and virtue signaling run amok. Sad to be so sheltered. How many videos would you like me to post of people being assaulted for the crime of attending a Trump rally by Antifa goons?
Or average people being attacked for wearing MAGA hats. There is a nice video of some fast food joint SJW losing it over a customer wearing a MAGA hat and ripping it off his head. Only demented NPC SJW drones can see MAGA hats in such a distorted way as to be triggered by them. Anyone who supports NPC SJW drones is either and idiot or one of them. No rational human being should tolerate such grotesque behavior which is all about violating other people's human rights in the name of Trotskyist "identity politics" and assorted other fake causes.
the murdochs, mercers, kochs, addlesons and 1,000 corporations that have succeeded spectacularly in capturing a large enough vote to put the coup de grâce to the administrative state.
Newfie wrote:Another question concerning the constitution.
Does the Constitution require the President to cooperate with the congress in the impeachment process?
{in US v Nixon, the "tapes" case} The Supreme Court acknowledged, for the first time, that an executive privilege exists under the Constitution, but it qualified the scope of the privilege by subjecting it to a balancing of the competing interests and legitimate needs of the executive and judicial branches.
Ibon wrote:Could that happen? Are Americans smart enough to stop regurgitating the fabricated polarity talking points and come together for real reform?
Cog wrote: It is not obstruction to refuse to testify or cooperate in an investigation.
Uncharted territory
One thing that's clear already is that if the House votes to impeach Trump -- and the Senate does not reach the two-thirds majority required to remove him from office -- the nation will face a novel political situation in 2020. None of the previous three presidents who faced a serious impeachment threat appeared on the next general election ballot.
Barry came to national prominence as mayor of the national capital, the first prominent civil rights activist to become chief executive of a major American city.[2] He gave the presidential nomination speech for Jesse Jackson at the 1984 Democratic National Convention. His celebrity was transformed into international notoriety in January 1990, when he was videotaped during a sting operation smoking crack cocaine and was arrested by Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) officials on drug charges. The arrest and subsequent trial precluded Barry from seeking re-election, and he served six months in a federal prison. After his release, he was elected to the Council of the District of Columbia in 1992. He was elected again as mayor in 1994, serving from 1995 to 1999.
Return to North America Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests