Manufacturing is in contraction (fact)
GDP heading to zero (1.5 estimates in Q3 and 1% in Q4)
Retail sales falling
Home sales falling
Durable goods just fell
Business investment just fell to lowest levels since Trump was elected
CAT earnings just tanked
Boeing earnings just tanked
Amazon earnings just tanked
Ford earnings were bad
GM earnings were bad
FED is pumping in 100 billion per night in the repo market to keeps the banks solvent
Once again looking at a few months and claiming the world is falling apart.
You can try to spin it any way you want, but it’s not going to change what’s happening. Everything is heading down if you like it or no
Has sentiment ever been so negative when markets have been so buoyant? Surely, something has got to give, right? And given the indicators flashing yellow or red lately, it’s safe to assume that the stock market is due for a comeuppance.
The thing, though, is this: “safe” doesn’t always turn out to be right. As much as there looks to be plenty of downside risk to equities, investors might want to be careful not to overreact to data or news and abandon equities altogether.
And yet, it’s also reasonable to note the counterbalances to the gloom in this case. One is that employment and consumer spending (supported by low interest rates) remain very strong — and consumers account for about two-thirds of U.S. GDP. Another is that manufacturing now represents barely more than 10 per cent of U.S. economic activity. Manufacturing companies, however, represent more than 40 per cent of the S&P 500’s market capitalization, which helps to explain the post-PMI swoon in a way that doesn’t suggest widespread fear so much as tactical reallocations.
The point is, with so much uncertainty, downside risk might be getting too much play, and that might lead some investors to ignore upside risk.
So where’s the upside? Easy money. Low, low rates. Central bankers who will do anything to forestall a recession.
The continuing low-to-lower interest rate environment could do a few positive things for equity valuations. One is that as much as policy-watchers worry that central banks are pushing on a rope in hopes of stimulating economic activity, in the end it just might work. Monetary stimulus typically takes a while to kick in; it’s possible we’re just in the lag phase now, and come this time next year we’ll be talking about an earnings rebound rather than an earnings recession.
Compare all that negativity with just the dividend yield of the S&P 500 — it’s almost two per cent, and it’s higher than the yield on a 20-year U.S. Treasury. In fact, low rates put a premium on dividend-paying equities, and many of those are blue chip companies in defensive sectors. So they might provide a hedge against a downturn while offering exposure to the upside in terms of yield. And on the earnings side, low rates support higher stock valuations — historically, anyway.
Of course, the global economy could still go completely pear-shaped and everyone will lose. But we don’t know what we don’t know. Even though things look gloomy, investors might regret it if they completely run for cover — the gloom might turn out to be a passing cloud
In article published by the De Nederlandsche Bank (DNB), or Dutch Central Bank, has shocked many with its claim that “if the system collapses, the gold stock can serve as a basis to build it up again. Gold bolsters confidence in the stability of the central bank’s balance sheet and creates a sense of security.”
After a part of the international banking system states the words “if the system collapses”, the obvious question to ask is:
Do they think the system will actually collapse?
There are solutions
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests