Pops wrote:Outcast_Searcher wrote:So let's have you and the D's who want the immigrants
wide open borders.
Point to my argument for "wide open borders."
Outcast_Searcher wrote:Pops wrote:Outcast_Searcher wrote:So let's have you and the D's who want the immigrants
wide open borders.
Point to my argument for "wide open borders."
No, because instead of YOU paying for the consequences, you want ME to pay for those consequences.
Are liberals capable of understanding that concept?
Outcast_Searcher wrote:So let's have you and the D's who want the immigrants voluntarily pay for all their benefits, etc. You house them, solve all their problems, etc.
Outcast_Searcher wrote:
So let's have you and the D's who want the immigrants voluntarily pay for all their benefits, etc. You house them, solve all their problems, etc.
Outcast_Searcher wrote:Yes. I'm "mean" (and honest) enough to admit I have an issue with the economic consequences of having wide open borders.
Pops wrote:(plant)
You reaaaally need a new source...
Pops wrote:Outcast_Searcher wrote:Yes. I'm "mean" (and honest) enough to admit I have an issue with the economic consequences of having wide open borders.
You quoted me then set up a strawman to knock down.
Point to where I advocated "wide open borders."
Why is this starting to seem like a Dallas episode?
jedrider wrote:To me, Elizabeth Warren and Tulsi Gabbard are the two candidates in contention that I find interesting and that would also have some traction and, certainly, also appear quite different from each other. Now, if Bernie would agree to be the VP running mate to either candidate, this would elicit a groundswell of voters that did not turn up in the last election.
Holding my breath that the DNC doesn't go full on boring. That's where Trump, trumped everyone, that he was not boring being such a loudmouth fool.
Boring = Safe.
But, we don't live in 'safe' nor 'settled' times.
Pops wrote:Warren has a very blue collar message and is starting to make inroads into the moderate electorate.
Her book way back, "two income trap" wasn't targeting latte liberals but working class people.
Yeah, she talks all the lefty identity stuff and welfare state programs and gets into the weeds with her plans but I think she's rising because she is learning to communicate better. trump has lock her up and build the wall, Liz is getting the chant "2 cents"
Outcast_Searcher wrote:Why not just kill all the rich and take all their money now and get it over with?
Pops wrote:
Return to North America Discussion
Users browsing this forum: MSN [Bot] and 17 guests