dauterman wrote:Cryptocurrencies are not currency. By definition a currency is backed by a government or other similar entity. There is no govenrment backing bitcoin or any other crypto.
Bitcoin is legal tender in El Slvador. Legal tender status means it can be used in trade and is accepted as payment. However, it is NOT backed by the full faith and credit of the government. This is an important difference.
Bitcoin traded as low as $86 in 2013. Has anything happened since 2013 that would justify the price rise from $83 to over $20,000? To me the answer is "no" - bitcoin has been accepted as legal tender in one central american coutnry, and is more accepted in trade internationally but in my opinion this does not justify the price going up around 24,000%.
Thus, in my opinion bitcoin is a bubble. My advice is to avoid any bubbled asset. I will neither buy (go long) not sell (go short) any bubbled asset. The reason for this is because financial markets can stay irrational longer than I can stay solvent.
v/r
dauterman
Alfred Tennyson wrote:We are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.
dauterman wrote:Bitcoin traded as low as $86 in 2013. Has anything happened since 2013 that would justify the price rise from $83 to over $20,000?
theluckycountry wrote:Now @AdamB can come in and say something intelligent about Queensland and Bananas.
Not that I'll see it though lol lol.
theluckycountry wrote:I wouldn't include oil in that list. It's suffering from volatility, sure, but the price rises we have seen are more in line with basic monetary inflation.
Plantagenet wrote:
If something basically quadruples in price in two years is that a price bubble? I think it clearly is a bubble.
dauterman wrote:Cryptocurrencies are not currency. By definition a currency is backed by a government or other similar entity. There is no govenrment backing bitcoin or any other crypto.
EnergyUnlimited wrote:dauterman wrote:Cryptocurrencies are not currency. By definition a currency is backed by a government or other similar entity. There is no govenrment backing bitcoin or any other crypto.
Is gold or silver backed by government or similar entity?
Do you trust gold more than dollar or the other way?
theluckycountry wrote:Well you're starting from the contango, so it doesn't really apply does it.
theluckycountry wrote:
That plunging price situation with oil was due to the lockdowns was it not? A totally unheard of event.
theluckycountry wrote:
Oil will go up and down in the future of course, it's a market and there is always going to be fluctuations, but I think it's fair to say the average price (under normal non-covid situations) will rise and rise going forward. It's energy, irreplaceable energy really. Take it out of the equation and try making solar panels and Lipo batteries anyone can afford. They "say" it can be done, but it never has been
For instance, who ever expected Putin to turn into ADOLPH PUTIN and try to conquer Ukraine? Totally unheard of, right?
The drop in oil demand will cause an eventual drop in oil prices.....and we will have seen yet another another BOOM-BUST oil price cycle in the oil Biz, this going from the bust in 2020 to the boom in 2022 to a future bust perhaps in 2023 or 2024?
The idea that central banks can control oil prices is amusing!
Doly wrote:The idea that central banks can control oil prices is amusing!
I got it from somebody who was giving a talk at an event organised by the Financial Times. I don't think they invite people that they don't think are knowledgeable on finance issues.
I agree with VT, central banks are full of economists, and work around them along enough and you realize they do the same thing the engineers you describe do. Everything is dependent upon X. "X" of course being whatever they were trained in.
The world needs more polymaths, and fewer folks wielding a hammer, and using it regardless of whether or not it is to a nail.
Doly wrote:I never said that central banks were correct. I just said they probably have the power to target stable oil prices. That doesn't mean it would be a good idea to do so.
Doly wrote:The world needs more polymaths, and fewer folks wielding a hammer, and using it regardless of whether or not it is to a nail.
You don't seem to like me much, and I happen to be one of those polymaths.
Doly wrote:
And also, there are some mathematical ideas that are rather powerful and can be used in a lot of different situations.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests