REAL Green wrote: “Universality is “an intriguing mystery…Why do certain laws seem to emerge from complex systems, he asked, “almost regardless of the underlying mechanisms driving those systems at the microscopic level?”
https://www.quantamagazine.org/beyond-t ... -20141015/
Sabine Hossenfelder has something to say about it.
Look on her entry from Friday, April 03, 2020
https://backreaction.blogspot.com/ When it comes to a complete life it is better if science keeps to itself and spirituality to itself. A separation is in order reflecting human duality. The ego and the sacred can produce demons and in some ways science and spirituality is similar to this human condition.
Being pagan of pantheist tilt myself (and also an industrial scientist albeit no longer in the trade) I don't see any necessity to separate these two.
Hence my remarks about
information as a separate entity absolutely critical for running for example life.
It is immaterial and meaningful for sure, so you may even call it
"soul/spirit".
Physicists will usually bark on such interpretation but they will not deny critical importance of said information for existence of life, all in addition to usual material components.
This issue is actually quite perplexing for many scientists who are of materialistic world view and yet understand this subject.
Go an read very serious scientific works of very bright physicists dealing with
holographic principle if in doubt.
You may also check another prominent theoretical physicist Roger Penrose and his ORCH-OR theory dealing with consciousness which he have proposed together with Mr Hameroff
My view is that science and spirituality can be reconciled and we might be on right tracks towards this goal.
Science is the problem now.
I believe that there is some knowledge, eg information present in Universe and yet not discovered that is best left hidden from us.
I believe that there is a knowledge which will allow us to tamper with life or other nanotechnology in such a way that extinction of most if not all of life which we know and humans together with it is going to result.
Further, I believe that upon accumulation of certain knowledge such technology could be developed on relatively low budget by a bright, lone maverick.
Physics is seeking the deepest realities of life like singularity.
I don't understand this phrase.
Singularity is usually pointing out that your theory have reached limit of application but as such singularity it is not real.
Its emergence tell you that you need better model (scientific theory) to deal with your problem at hand.
The whole discussion of a 100% renewable world is another. Cover the world in pannels and turbines is absurd. Humans are out of control because of the quest for knowledge without limits.
Economic collapse, resulting ruin and all ills related to it combined with constrains exercised by Nature should deal with it.
The higher power maintains balance and harmony by nature of its design. No way of knowing the higher power but that does not mean it should not be respected or the consequences are horrendous. Science can’t explain this because it breaks apart things in study instead of beholding all at once. Nothing can behold all at once and if it could it would stop in paralysis.
IMO this higher power is surrounding Nature - and undoubtedly she will take us off circulation at some point.