TheAntiDoomer wrote:Actually we are talking about a 300 mile range for around 20,000$.
You mean like the 1996 Solectria Sunrise with the 27 kWh NiMH pack? $20,000 would have been its price in volume production. It met NHSTA requirements and could seat a family. The major automakers wouldn't touch it back then, despite positive consumer response and interest.
We don't need an advanced battery for gasoline-like range and performance and cheaper than gasoline cost! We had what we needed almost 20 years ago. It's called a design that considers the vehicle as an entire system instead of focusing on individual components in isolation. Such a design will start with an uncompromisingly aerodynamic body, and then make the styling conform to the aerodynamics, not the other way around, and will incorporate the use of those weight saving techniques that won't kill the budget, while using a battery technology that is appropriate for the application. This philosophy is every bit applicable to ICE cars as well, allowing 80+ mpg with no compromises to the consumer. It does not fit well with the planned obsolescence vehicle production model though.
Dave Cloud's modified Geo Metro can do 200 miles range at 65 mph on flooded golf cart batteries for f**k's sake. He built it for $3,000(~$7,000 if you count the parts he had laying around for free). His goal was to build a 200 mile range car on a low budget, and he was successful. The motors, controllers, and batteries were all well out of date by 10+ years as far as the hobbyist market is concerned, let alone what the automakers have today at their disposal.
That being said, if true, this battery advancement will only make EVs that much more viable than they've been. A conversion with a 250 mile range on LiFePO4 could be made to get 1,000 miles instead for the same weight. 1,000 miles range, and recharge time is not even an issue at all.