Peak Oil News and Message Boards

A worker at a federal laboratory in Colorado intentionally manipulated test results for years, possibly tainting research on toxic metals in the Everglades, uranium near the Grand Canyon and coal in Afghanistan, investigators say.

The falsified data from a U.S. Geological Survey lab may have affected 24 coal, water and environmental research projects costing a total of $108 million, according to a report released recently by the Interior Department's inspector general.

The agency isn't sure why the employee falsified the results of chemical analyses, but it wasn't for personal gain or "any nefarious reason," USGS spokeswoman Anne-Berry Wade said Thursday.

A notice on the agency's website said the manipulation was done in part to correct calibration failures in the instrument being used, a mass spectrometer.

USGS said it did not believe the tainted data affected any decisions by lawmakers or regulators.

The manipulation occurred between 2008 and 2014 at the USGS Energy Geochemistry Laboratory in the Denver suburb of Lakewood, the inspector general said. The test samples were mostly coal and water.

The laboratory is part of the USGS Energy Resources Program, which studies potential energy sources around the world. The program made headlines two weeks ago when it said western Colorado contained 40 times more natural gas than previously thought, making it the second-largest gas formation in the country. There was no indication that report relied on the falsified data.

USGS managers halted all work at the laboratory when they discovered the manipulation in late 2014, Wade said. In February 2016, the agency permanently closed the section of the lab that was involved.

The inspector general's report raised questions about why the problem went undetected for so long, saying employees were suspicious of the lab's work for years. Wade said a new lab director took over in 2014 and decided to look into the suspicions.

Investigators previously found that mass spectrometer operators in the same lab violated standards between 1996 and 2008. Investigators said the operators were making excessive adjustments in instrument readings to compensate for calibration problems.

The Energy Resources Program said on its website it plans to create the position of quality assurance manager to monitor data.


D'oh

“We, the unwilling, led by the unknowing, are doing the impossible for the ungrateful. We have done so much, for so long, with so little, we are now qualified to do anything with nothing.” - Konstantin Jireček

jjhman wrote:This sounds like the kind of stupid things people do when they are poorly supervised, insecure in their careers and afraid of being caught not "producing".

Plantagenet wrote:

jjhman wrote:This sounds like the kind of stupid things people do when they are poorly supervised, insecure in their careers and afraid of being caught not "producing".

This sounds like the kind of lazy behavior overconfident government employees fall into when they know they won't be fired no matter how low quality their work turns out to be.

ROCKMAN wrote:"The Energy Resources Program said on its website it plans to create the position of quality assurance manager to monitor data." So they are saying that a govt testing department with a budget that ran into the hundreds of $MILLIONS (if not $BILLONS) for the last 10 to 20 years didn't have a position hadfhadfling quality control?

Rockman wrote: This wasn't some pig boat trying to get by as best as they could but a huge onshore facility that could have been routinely checked.