The war on terror is getting to look more and more like the cold war.
I wouldn't be worried just because the Chinese had one article, in English, on EMP. I've seen lots of writing about EMP here in the US.
And the rhetoric of the report, though couched in "defensive" language, is primarily fightin' words. You can read it yourself:
http://www.iwar.org.uk/iwar/resources/e ... -22emp.pdf
Here's some choice verbiage:
"The US must establish a global environment that will profoundly discourage such attacks. We must persuade nations to forgo obtaining nuclear weapons or to provide acceptable assurance that these weapons will neither threaten the vital interests of the United States nor fall into threatening hands.
For all others, we must make it difficult and dangerous to acquire the materials to make a nuclear weapon and the means to deliver them. We must hold at risk of capture or destruction anyone who has such
weaponry, wherever they are in the world.
Those who engage in or support these activities must be made to understand that they do so at the risk of everything they value. Those who harbor or help those who conspire to create these weapons must suffer serious consequences as well.
In case these measures do not completely succeed, we must have vigorous interdiction and interception efforts to thwart delivery of all such weaponry.
-- end quotes --
Jesus Christ on a shingle! Don't these thinktankers realize that becoming a paranoid beleaguered supercop makes us MORE the target of terrorism, never LESS!
We won't be "safe from terrorism" until we learn to "play well with others!"