Newfie wrote:no evidence of a hack.
the problem is you are arguing that I'm a hysterical HC supporter demanding a recount because there was a hack.
But in fact I posted a 6 days ago that recounts would be bad and then posted a link indicating hacks improbable:
Pops wrote:from wapoReached by email, Halderman pointed us to a statement he'd written at Medium. It's a lengthy examination of how vote-tallying systems have been rigged or manipulated in the past, but the most important line (for our purposes) is this one:
Were this year’s deviations from pre-election polls the results of a cyberattack? Probably not. I believe the most likely explanation is that the polls were systematically wrong, rather than that the election was hacked.
But, because I am sooo upset that HC lost I'm obviously making myself hysterical to the point of believing you can actually hack something not connected to the cyber, when presumably, everyone except me knows that is silly.
Even though six posted several explanations how that might happen directly before your post.
But here, let me google it for you
https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=c ... net&tbas=0first non-wiki
An Iranian double agent working for Israel used a standard thumb drive carrying a deadly payload to infect Iran's Natanz nuclear facility with the highly destructive Stuxnet computer worm, according to a story by ISSSource.
https://www.cnet.com/news/stuxnet-deliv ... umb-drive/Next
Sometime around 2008, computerized industrial control system equipment bound for Iran was intercepted, and Stuxnet or other malware was installed on it before it was sent on its way, McBride posits.
http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Security ... r-facilityNext
To get Stuxnet to its target machines, the attackers first infect computers belonging to five outside companies that are believed to be connected in some way to the nuclear program. The aim is to make each “patient zero” an unwitting carrier who will help spread and transport the weapon on flash drives into the protected facility and the Siemens computers.
https://www.wired.com/2014/11/countdown ... y-stuxnet/So, to review
you mistake my position
then tell me that position indicates I'm hysterical
Don't understand the cyber
then tell me that your lack of understanding indicates I'm hysterical
then assert that you're above all the hype
which means I'm obviously pissed of and hysterical
So, angry? No
Frustrated that you seem bound to tell me I'm hysterical regardless of my stated position?
what do you think?