ernest wrote:The gold standard had no more value than the current standard. Back then Gold had a more stable and meaningful value. Today gold is not some kind of eternal and never ending value, it is just a precious metal.
Do you see what a contradiction this is? Either gold has no value, or it is a 'precious metal'. It cannot be both. Ask anyone and i'll expect that the answer is that it has value. Lots of value.
ernest wrote:The dollar, and all currencies are value based in the sense that they reflect the strength and stability of the economy that they stem from. The US economy is still huge and a blockbuster.
Then why has the US $ lost so much value over the last 3 years? The US economy is huge yes, but it's shell when compared to the might of it's post WW2 economy. Back then, the US was the worlds biggest exporter and creditor. Subsequently, the US has outsourced alot of it's industry over the past 20 years as well as just the simple fact that the US is one of China's largest markets and thus the US now imports vastly more than it exports resulting in a massive trade deficit.
ernest wrote:The one thing that is dragging the dollar done is the inflation rate in the US, and it is made worse by the incredible liquidity, cheap money, and bogus real estate loans. I heard one the other day: "Borrow more than the price of the house, cash back, 1% variable rate for the first year, and yada yada." What could possible inflate house prices and the currency more than loans like that?
You're correct in saying that the massive increase in the money supply is a bad thing, but inflation that is causes isnt the reason behind the decline in the $US. Many factors govern the exchange rate of a fiat currency, but to single out inflation as the sole governor i think is a bit short sighted.