Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

The Seaway Pipeline

A forum for discussion of regional topics including oil depletion but also government, society, and the future.

The Seaway Pipeline

Unread postby PeakOiler » Sat 19 May 2012, 07:21:44

The Seaway pipeline is scheduled to begin operations this weekend.

Reuters Article

The first crude oil was expected to flow on the reversed Seaway pipeline this weekend, partners Enterprise Products and Enbridge Inc said on Thursday, a historic move to ease a Midwest oil glut and bring depressed North American crude prices closer to world market levels.

The startup skidded two or three days from the target of Thursday for restart of the 500-mile (805-km), 30-inch (76-cm) pipeline, which initially will deliver 150,000 barrels per day from the Cushing, Oklahoma, trading and storage hub to Houston in the heart of the main U.S. refining center.
<<snip>>
...analysts caution that the impact of the Seaway reversal could be slow to hit U.S. oil markets, even after flows hit their target of 400,000 bpd in the first quarter next year.


See http://seawaypipeline.com/ for a map and more info.
There’s a strange irony related to this subject [oil and gas extraction] that the better you do the job at exploiting this oil and gas, the sooner it is gone.

--Colin Campbell
User avatar
PeakOiler
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3664
Joined: Thu 18 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Central Texas

Re: The Seaway Pipeline

Unread postby Cog » Sat 19 May 2012, 07:37:30

Higher oil prices in the Midwest are coming. Well it was a good ride while it lasted.
User avatar
Cog
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 13416
Joined: Sat 17 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Northern Kekistan

Re: The Seaway Pipeline

Unread postby Revi » Sat 19 May 2012, 21:44:30

About time you felt a little of the pain at the pump us East and West Coasters have to feel. We're at around $3.75 now, which is about a quarter cheaper than it was a month ago. Our price is based on the price of Brent Crude, since most of the oil that comes into Maine is from there.
Deep in the mud and slime of things, even there, something sings.
User avatar
Revi
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7417
Joined: Mon 25 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Maine

Re: The Seaway Pipeline

Unread postby Lore » Sat 19 May 2012, 22:04:42

Revi wrote:About time you felt a little of the pain at the pump us East and West Coasters have to feel. We're at around $3.75 now, which is about a quarter cheaper than it was a month ago. Our price is based on the price of Brent Crude, since most of the oil that comes into Maine is from there.


I'm presently paying $3.80 right now in NW lower Michigan. We were paying about $4.10 a little over a month ago. The oil drain from the Midwest will probably cost us another 20 cents on average above and beyond any ripple from Seaway when the XL Pipeline finally goes through.
The things that will destroy America are prosperity-at-any-price, peace-at-any-price, safety-first instead of duty-first, the love of soft living, and the get-rich-quick theory of life.
... Theodore Roosevelt
User avatar
Lore
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 9021
Joined: Fri 26 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Fear Of A Blank Planet

Re: The Seaway Pipeline

Unread postby PeakOiler » Thu 07 Jun 2012, 07:04:30

The first oil from Cushing, OK arrives at the hub near Freeport, TX.

Reuters Article

The reversed Seaway oil pipeline delivered the first crude from the Cushing, Oklahoma, trading hub to the Gulf Coast o n W ednesday, a historic step aimed at easing the glut of crude in the U.S. Midwest, partners Enterprise Products and Enbridge Inc announced.


Market reaction was the opposite of what was expected when reversal was announced last fall. The hope was to bring depressed U.S. and Canadian crudes more in line with the world market as Cushing emptied.


"It's going to take a while to draw Cushing down with inventories pushing 48 million barrels," a trader said.

The U.S. government on Wednesday reported a build in crude inventories at Cushing last week even though U.S. inventories fell.
There’s a strange irony related to this subject [oil and gas extraction] that the better you do the job at exploiting this oil and gas, the sooner it is gone.

--Colin Campbell
User avatar
PeakOiler
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3664
Joined: Thu 18 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Central Texas

Re: The Seaway Pipeline

Unread postby PeakOiler » Sun 12 Aug 2012, 09:03:52

Reuters Article

* Seaway looping to be finished in 2014

* Seaway to run about 850,000 bpd when completed


Aug 1 (Reuters) - Enterprise Products Partners LP said on Wednesday its project to expand the Cushing-to-Houston Seaway crude oil pipeline from 150,000 barrels per day to 400,000 bpd was on schedule for completion in the first quarter of 2013.

Speaking to analysts during its second quarter earnings call, the company said that in addition to the initial expansion, looping or twinning a parallel pipeline will increase capacity by 450,000 to be completed by mid 2014.

Total capacity of the reversed line will reach about 850,000 bpd, depending on the mix of crude it carries.

Seaway, the first southbound pipeline to come online to alleviate the glut of oil in the storage hub of Cushing, Oklahoma, is jointly owned with Enbridge Inc.


Recall that the Seaway pipeline reversal didn't begin until May, 2012.

I added a trendline to the graph of PADD 3 imported oil using data from the EIA:

Image

It will be interesting to see what happens to the graph over the next few years.
There’s a strange irony related to this subject [oil and gas extraction] that the better you do the job at exploiting this oil and gas, the sooner it is gone.

--Colin Campbell
User avatar
PeakOiler
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3664
Joined: Thu 18 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Central Texas

Re: The Seaway Pipeline

Unread postby PeakOiler » Mon 07 Jan 2013, 20:03:14

I came across this update:
Businessweek article

Brent is expected to lose some of its premium over WTI as the Seaway pipeline connecting the U.S. supply hub at Cushing, Oklahoma to refineries on the Gulf Coast, increases to 400,000 barrels a day from 150,000 a day this week. As Brent’s premium declines, domestic crudes are more attractive to refiners compared with imports.

“I think that we will see this trend continue now that the expansion is imminent,” said Andy Lipow, President of Lipow Oil Associates LLC in Houston.

Enterprise Products Partners LP (EPD) and Enbridge Inc. (ENB) plan to resume service on the 500-mile (805-kilometer) Seaway link at the 400,000-barrel-a-day rate late this week, Houston-based spokesman Rick Rainey said in an e-mail Jan. 3.


Seaway has a new announcement (January 2nd) in their news section:
http://seawaypipeline.com/news/

Someone please remind me, 400k barrels/day is approximately equal to how many averaged-sized oil tanker ships unloading in a day?
There’s a strange irony related to this subject [oil and gas extraction] that the better you do the job at exploiting this oil and gas, the sooner it is gone.

--Colin Campbell
User avatar
PeakOiler
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3664
Joined: Thu 18 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Central Texas

Re: The Seaway Pipeline

Unread postby Pops » Mon 07 Jan 2013, 20:34:27

I saw this too. I think they waited until the PO price game deadline just to throw us off. I expected more middle of the year and that the drilling peak last year would drive up stocks and down price.

Drats! Foiled again!
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac

Re: The Seaway Pipeline

Unread postby Tanada » Mon 07 Jan 2013, 22:56:38

PeakOiler wrote:I came across this update:
Businessweek article

Brent is expected to lose some of its premium over WTI as the Seaway pipeline connecting the U.S. supply hub at Cushing, Oklahoma to refineries on the Gulf Coast, increases to 400,000 barrels a day from 150,000 a day this week. As Brent’s premium declines, domestic crudes are more attractive to refiners compared with imports.

“I think that we will see this trend continue now that the expansion is imminent,” said Andy Lipow, President of Lipow Oil Associates LLC in Houston.

Enterprise Products Partners LP (EPD) and Enbridge Inc. (ENB) plan to resume service on the 500-mile (805-kilometer) Seaway link at the 400,000-barrel-a-day rate late this week, Houston-based spokesman Rick Rainey said in an e-mail Jan. 3.


Seaway has a new announcement (January 2nd) in their news section:
http://seawaypipeline.com/news/

Someone please remind me, 400k barrels/day is approximately equal to how many averaged-sized oil tanker ships unloading in a day?


Based on a quick surf the dead average oil tanker hauls 2 Mbbl so the seaway pipeline running 400,000 could replace one every 5 days. If we get 10 Mbb/day by ship then Seaway is offsetting 4% of imports, on the other hand the GOM refineries are not the only import point in the USA. The LOOP off of Louisiana averages 1.2 Mbbl/d so Seaway will replace 1/3rd of the oil LOOP imports daily.
Alfred Tennyson wrote:We are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.
User avatar
Tanada
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 17056
Joined: Thu 28 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South West shore Lake Erie, OH, USA

Re: The Seaway Pipeline

Unread postby sparky » Mon 07 Jan 2013, 23:11:47

.
@ Peakoiler
" 400k barrels/day is approximately equal to how many averaged-sized oil tanker "
if one take a large super tanker , that's 200.000 dead weight tons

I'm not quite sure one can berth , connect ,unload and move away a tanker this size in 24 Hours
never mind two , days in , days out in
User avatar
sparky
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3587
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Sydney , OZ

Re: The Seaway Pipeline

Unread postby Pops » Tue 08 Jan 2013, 09:28:01

It isn't so much offsetting imports as reducing stocks in Cushing that will impact the price.

Exports (of product) have plateaued but I'd bet they resume the uptick.


oil stocks by area.png
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac

Re: The Seaway Pipeline

Unread postby Tanada » Tue 08 Jan 2013, 10:05:18

Pops correct me if I am wrong but I thought that Seaway was used to haul excess imports into the GOM oil ports north to Cushing, OK because they had refineries and storage capacity in Cushing to use it. Then when the Canadian oil started making its way south it was ending up in Cushing as well and things were easier because not as much had to come up from the GOM to keep those refineries at Cushing going. Then the boom in ND took place and suddenly Cushing had as much as they needed and plenty of excess as well so the price for WTI which is set at Cushing went all out of whack with the world price because international imports were no longer reaching Cushing except for some Canadian oil that trades at WTI prices. Someone was smart enough to say hey, we already have a pipeline, it is just set up to run in the wrong direction so they have been reworking the pumping stations to shove the oil all the way to GOM instead of leaving it in storage at Cushing.

This will relieve the glut at Cushing and cause the WTI price to climb back up closer to the Brent/International price instead of being artificially low as it has been these last two years or more. The other thing it will do is supply some of the oil needed by the refineries along the GOM so they will have less need to buy international oil, but 400,000 bbl/d is one average tanker a week so the impact won't be huge, just barely noticeable.

So if I have all of that more or less correct, how long until the glut is gone at Cushing and WTI climbs back up to withing $10.00 of Brent?
Alfred Tennyson wrote:We are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.
User avatar
Tanada
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 17056
Joined: Thu 28 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South West shore Lake Erie, OH, USA

Re: The Seaway Pipeline

Unread postby Pops » Tue 08 Jan 2013, 12:19:37

That all sounds right to me.

EIA says there is 50MMbbls there now but I don't know how much is flowing in, looks like maybe 3-4MMbbl a year increase on average?

Buffets railroad is hauling a lot of ND/WY oil straight to refineries now and has more capacity yet.
Bakken drilling is still increasing but it's almost all infill now with few exploration wells, at least from the PR I've seen.
Then there is the Keystone pipe Gulf Coast project...

This is cool:
Image
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac

Re: The Seaway Pipeline

Unread postby kublikhan » Tue 08 Jan 2013, 12:56:03

Is a new oil glut in store for Houston?

The Ho-Ho reversal completes a new crude logistics paradigm in the US. Under the old paradigm the needs of Gulf Coast refineries that exceeded local onshore and offshore Gulf of Mexico production were met by imported foreign crude. A portion of that imported crude also flowed from the Gulf Coast to the Midwest when refinery capacity in that region exceeded domestic and Canadian supplies. In the new paradigm, from early 2013 incremental crude supplies to feed Gulf Coast refineries will come from domestic production and Canadian imports rather than from foreign imports into the Gulf Coast. The pipeline projects to facilitate this new paradigm are already well underway but will really kick into gear over the next two years. The table below shows the projects together with their capacities and expected online service dates.

Pipeline Capacity Mb/d Service date Route
XOM Pegasus 96 Existing Patoka to Nederland
Seaway 1 150 2012 Cushing to Houston
Seaway 2 250 2013 Cushing to Houston
Seaway 3 450 2014 Cushing to Houston
Keystone Gulf ext 700 2013 Cushing to Nederland
Keystone Hou Lateral 130 2014 Cushing to Houston
Eagle Ford Enterprise 350 2012 Leissy to Katy
West TX Gulf 40 2012 Midland to Nederland
West TX Gulf 90 2013 Midland to Houston
Permian Express 1 90 2013 Colorado City to Nederland
Permian Express 2 110 2014 Colorado City to Nederland
Longhorn Reversal 225 2013 Crane to Houston
Bridge Tex 278 2015 Colorado City to Texas City
KM Crude/Condensate 300 2012 East Eagle Ford to Houston
Total new capacity: 2012-2015 3113

In short these projects add up to a whopping 3.1 MMb/d of new crude capacity into the Houston area by 2015. Although Texas Gulf Coast refineries (3.8 MMb/d) could absorb the new crude it is unlikely that they will abandon their existing suppliers overnight. We have previously covered the crude quality issues that will make it hard for Gulf Coast refiners to simply switch their supplies on a dime (see Turner Mason and the Goblet of Light and Heavy). Instead refiners will gradually replace existing imports, perhaps initially by blending them with the newer lighter crudes. That means the new crude supplies coming into Houston could start to backup pretty quickly – resulting in a new supply logjam on the Texas Gulf Coast.

A potentially more flexible relief valve for crude trying to reach the Louisiana Gulf Coast from Texas will be additional rail tank car movement. Such movements from the Eagle Ford and Permian basins direct to St James, LA or Louisiana area refineries are already taking place and they could increase. Just as we saw in Cushing over the past two years, the build up of a crude stockpile in Houston will discount prices there versus the Louisiana Gulf Coast enough to make the higher cost of rail car movements economic.

Another outlet valve to help crude supplies from Texas reach the Louisiana Gulf is waterborne movement. There are already three tankers moving Eagle Ford crude from Corpus Christi, TX to LOOP LA. Those tanker movements are restricted because they are between US ports and have to use Jones Act vessels. They are however being encouraged by the LOOP port authority that has constructed offloading facilities that suit the smaller tankers being used for these coastal waterborne movements.

For now, the Ho-Ho reversal looks - on paper at least to be a logical missing link between the Texas and Louisiana refining markets - required to complete the shift to a new US crude oil logistics paradigm. However when you add up the new crude flows coming to the Gulf Coast, the Ho-Ho project does not provide enough capacity to prevent an oversupply problem in Houston. The arrival of 3.1 MMb/d of new crude supplies into the Texas and Louisiana refining markets over the next two years is shaping up to be quite chaotic. The Ho-Ho reversal may also compound the problems by creating a separate supply build up in Louisiana.
Will Gulf Coast crude flow smoothly?
The oil barrel is half-full.
User avatar
kublikhan
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 5018
Joined: Tue 06 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Illinois

Re: The Seaway Pipeline

Unread postby kublikhan » Tue 08 Jan 2013, 14:15:23

Diesel shortage and gasoline glut:

Most crude oils when they come out of the ground are relatively balanced across the yield curve. So for example, a light crude might yield 25% naphtha & lighter products, 30% middle distillates, 30% gas oils and 15% bottoms. A heavy crude will have a lot less naphtha and middle distillates and a lot more bottoms

But what if you had a crude oil with a lot of naphtha and lighter fractions, a lot of heavy bottoms and nothing in the middle? Big on one end – big on the other end. Like a dumbbell. For decades unscrupulous crude oil marketers have been buying batches of cheap heavy crude and very light crude. They then blend the two together to make a crude with API and sulfur specification that looks like West Texas Intermediate (WTI) and sell the resulting cocktail to unsuspecting refiners as WTI. Refiners hate these artificial blends because their refinery processes are balanced for real WTI, so the fake dumbbell grade throws off operations. Also because dumbbell crudes have little middle distillate fractions, the refinery produces less diesel, fuel oil and jet fuel the refined products that come from the middle distillate range. These days with diesel and related products at high prices, that’s a bad thing.

The Dumbbelling of the US Crude Slate
Because of the influx of a mixture of very light shale and very heavy Canadian crudes, the entire crude slate for U.S. refiners is being ‘dumbbelled’. Here’s how:
On one end, US domestic crude production from shale is growing rapidly. The majority of this new crude production is light sweet crude, with a significant percentage consisting of what TM&C calls Super Light crude (42 – 60 API) and for the first time in US history, large volumes of condensate – very high API gravity ultra-light liquids that are being produced from shale basins –plays like the Eagle Ford and Granite Wash. These super-lights and condensates are increasing as a percentage of the total U.S. crude mix, and are one end of our dumbbell.

The other end of the dumbbell is growing too. That is because of increasing imports of Canadian crude, which is super-heavy. Very heavy crude extracted from tar sands (called bitumen) are mixed with various diluants to enable them to flow in pipelines (the resultant mix known as dilbit). In effect, dilbit is a dumbbell crude by definition.

Put these two developments together and you have a situation where the entire U.S. crude slate is starting to look more like those dumbbell crudes that the refineries don’t like – with similar consequences – Yields of middle distillates will decline, and gasoline production as a percentage of total refinery output will grow.

As the dumbbell crude mix grows as a percentage of the total crude oil supply (backing out international waterborne imports), production of diesel, fuel oil and jet fuel will fall. There just won’t be as many middle distillate molecules around. Ultimately this will wipe out much of the lucrative diesel export market.

US domestic demand for gasoline has shrunk over the last 5 years as drivers use fuel-efficient autos and as ethanol mandate volumes replace gasoline in the tank. While gasoline exports have been growing, the international market for gasoline is more competitive than it is for diesel, so margins are lower. Because of the high naphtha content of super light sweet shale crudes and the diluent component of dilbit, there will be a lot more naphtha in the U.S. crude mix, and that will make a lot more gasoline. So much more that gasoline production (as a percentage of total refinery output) will grow, resulting in the need for significant increases in gasoline exports. Pressure to export gasoline will be a good thing for lower gasoline prices here in the U.S.
Dumbbell Lessons Refiners Need to Learn
The oil barrel is half-full.
User avatar
kublikhan
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 5018
Joined: Tue 06 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Illinois

Re: The Seaway Pipeline

Unread postby PeakOiler » Tue 08 Jan 2013, 20:45:58

Here's an updated graph of PADD 3 (Gulf Coast) Oil Imports:

Image

Compare this graph to the one I posted above. Notice the trendline's slope is getting steeper.
There’s a strange irony related to this subject [oil and gas extraction] that the better you do the job at exploiting this oil and gas, the sooner it is gone.

--Colin Campbell
User avatar
PeakOiler
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3664
Joined: Thu 18 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Central Texas

Re: The Seaway Pipeline

Unread postby PeakOiler » Sat 12 Jan 2013, 08:43:01

Another pipeline update (hat tip to
http://www.cx-portal.com/wti/oil_en.html ) for the link:

global dispatch/thomson reuters article
* Project could have major impact on global oil prices * U.S. benchmark WTI crude narrows its discount to Brent * 2013 to see 1 million bpd pipe ewly expanded to carry up to 400,000 barrels per day (bpd), began pumping crude on Friday from an over-supplied U.S. Midwest region to the Gulf Coast, in a start-up that could heavily impact global oil prices. The 500-mile (805 km) pipeline, a joint venture between Enterprise Product Partners and Enbridge Inc, had been shut since Jan. 2 to prepare for shipping higher volumes from Cushing, Oklahoma, to Freeport, Texas. Its earlier capacity was 150,000 bpd. Seaway re-opened on Friday, its owners said in a statement. Enbridge confirmed that crude was flowing through the line on Friday afternoon, although it didn't say at what volume. An Enterprise spokesman declined to comment on current volumes of crude flowing down the line. Seaway's expansion has been widely anticipated by oil traders. It is among the first major projects in a trend of reconfiguration for U.S. pipeline networks that could alleviate distortions in global oil markets caused by depressed oil prices at the landlocked U.S. futures delivery hub of Cushing, Oklahoma. Seaway's owners plan to expand the line further, to 850,000 bpd, by early 2014.
By Joshua Schneyer Jan 11 (Reuters) - The Seaway oil pipeline
There’s a strange irony related to this subject [oil and gas extraction] that the better you do the job at exploiting this oil and gas, the sooner it is gone.

--Colin Campbell
User avatar
PeakOiler
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3664
Joined: Thu 18 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Central Texas

Re: The Seaway Pipeline

Unread postby PeakOiler » Wed 06 Feb 2013, 20:10:22

I came across another update thanks to the reference I gave above:

Brent-WTI Reconciliation Dreams Shattered

<<snip>>The Cushing crude stockpile still remains stubbornly high according to Energy Information Administration (EIA) data. Although down this past week (January 21, 2013) from a record high of 52 MMBbl on January 7, 2013 the stockpile is still only 187 MBbl lower than that record. There are two likely culprits for the continuing record stockpile. The first is Midwest refinery demand (see above) and the second is the strange goings on with the Seaway Pipeline.
The strange goings on came to the attention of spread fans last week (January 23, 2013). We learned then that the Seaway pipeline capacity between Cushing and Houston - increased from 150 Mb/d to 400 Mb/d earlier in January - had to be scaled back to 175 Mb/d by operator Enterprise. The company posted a notice to shippers stating that because of “unforeseen constraints in outbound takeaway…. the Jones Creek delivery point has reached maximum capacity”.
The constraint on the Seaway pipeline was caused by congestion at the Houston end of the system that the operator Enterprise says will potentially continue until late in 2013. The constraint will only be relieved once Enterprise completes a lateral pipeline from Jones Creek to its ECHO terminal
There’s a strange irony related to this subject [oil and gas extraction] that the better you do the job at exploiting this oil and gas, the sooner it is gone.

--Colin Campbell
User avatar
PeakOiler
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3664
Joined: Thu 18 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Central Texas

Re: The Seaway Pipeline

Unread postby PeakOiler » Sat 20 Jul 2013, 08:50:16

Seaway Pipeline shut down, at least for awhile, according to the cx-portal linked article to the WSJ:

http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20130711-708320.html

The article is dated 11-July.

NEW YORK--Losses in crude-oil futures prices deepened Thursday after an unconfirmed report that the Seaway Pipeline has been shut down, traders said.


WTI closed at about $105.07 on that date. EIA reported a close of $104.91 on 11-July. And as many of y'all probably know, WTI was trading above Brent for a little while before declining a bit yesterday. Been awhile since that happened.

I wonder if the shutdown was due to power outages at the pumping stations? All the WSJ says was "decreased power consumption" was detected at the stations. Anyone else have more details?
There’s a strange irony related to this subject [oil and gas extraction] that the better you do the job at exploiting this oil and gas, the sooner it is gone.

--Colin Campbell
User avatar
PeakOiler
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3664
Joined: Thu 18 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Central Texas

Re: The Seaway Pipeline

Unread postby Tanada » Sat 20 Jul 2013, 09:17:05

Brent and WTI are back to trading very close together after three years of Dakota tight oil gluts and WSJ reacts this way? I dunno what their motivation is but this kind of reporting never made any sense too me. It is reminiscent of the 2008 reports where oil would climb $10.00/bbl over a two week period and then decline $0.50 two days in a row at which point they would proclaim Oil was suffering massive price drops. It is just nonsensical.
Alfred Tennyson wrote:We are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.
User avatar
Tanada
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 17056
Joined: Thu 28 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South West shore Lake Erie, OH, USA

Next

Return to North America Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests