Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE NAFTA Thread (merged)

A forum for discussion of regional topics including oil depletion but also government, society, and the future.

Re: Free Trade, NAFTA, etc.

Unread postby Outcast_Searcher » Wed 23 Mar 2016, 20:22:58

Simon_R wrote:
It benefits the rich and hurts the poor


It Benefits the Rich, and hurts the first world Poor.

I work with a large number of third world people who would be in poverty if not for globalization.

Whatever you do, don't introduce facts into the face of the tirades of the randomly self-righteous. The induced screeching hurts the ears of the producers (of the wealth, and the jobs).

Meanwhile, I'm always amused at how the Walmart Haters want to remove Walmart from the "evil" China. As though they would be producing more jobs for Chinese people. Sure. :roll: As though all Walmart employees only report to work under the point of a gun.

And no, I have NO link to Walmart, except as a customer who recognizes that for consistently low prices, I need to do some searching and self-check-out on occasion.
Given the track record of the perma-doomer blogs, I wouldn't bet a fast crash doomer's money on their predictions.
User avatar
Outcast_Searcher
COB
COB
 
Posts: 10142
Joined: Sat 27 Jun 2009, 21:26:42
Location: Central KY

Re: Free Trade, NAFTA, etc.

Unread postby ralfy » Wed 23 Mar 2016, 20:40:02

Kylon wrote:There is no arguement that Free Trade increases wealth overall. The problem is that it takes wealth away from workers/middle class, while enriching financiers and industrialist.

It allows the corporations and the political and economic elite to have a weapon which they can threaten the American worker.

That's why it's hated.

It allows a big corporation to say to American workers "Either you reduce the wages you demand, or we will ship all your jobs overseas". Thus American workers hate it. They see no benefit from it whatsoever, and rightfully so. What good is increased wealth in the system, if you don't get any of it?

Furthermore, the greater the wealth inequality the less relative political power the American worker has. Thus it's not just a matter of survival in the economic sense, in the long run, globalization gives corporations the power to completely undermine democracy.

So the American worker is rational in his hatred of free trade, it is in no way beneficial to him. It benefits the rich and hurts the poor.


I think that's the result of capitalism, especially free market capitalism.
User avatar
ralfy
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5574
Joined: Sat 28 Mar 2009, 11:36:38
Location: The Wasteland

Re: Free Trade, NAFTA, etc.

Unread postby Shaved Monkey » Thu 24 Mar 2016, 03:06:24

Australia has recently signed a FTA with China,Korea and Japan
Free trade is great for the middle man and crap for the poor.
Chinese are willing to pay $11 a litre for Australian milk we currently pay $1 a litre.
As if they will keep selling it to us for $1 for too much longer.
Australian grass fed beef is hitting record highs as Chinese buyers want more meat.
Fresh Australian seafood is exported for maximum profit while we get to import cheap SEAsian farmed seafood frozen for domestic consumption.
We export fresh cherries to the US in your winter and import US cherries in our winter.
The US cherries are old and crap and expensive when they get here as I imagine the Australian ones are too.
You used to be able to go to the markets and pick up cherries dirt cheap as they have a limited shelf life now there arent any excess cherries.

FTAs are crap
Ready to turn Zombies into WWOOFers
User avatar
Shaved Monkey
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2486
Joined: Wed 30 Mar 2011, 01:43:28

Re: Free Trade, NAFTA, etc.

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Thu 24 Mar 2016, 05:34:28

Australian farmers deserve a much better deal than they have been getting from the big supermarket controlled set up. $1-2 a liter for milk is a joke considering what goes into producing it. If the Chinese want to pay $8-12 for it & the duoploly of Coles & Woolworths is broken, this is very good for Aussie dairy producers & the regions they farm. Personally I haven't been into dairy since I was a child, which seems pretty natural to me, unlike adults consuming food designed for infants of another species. The worst affected are those in general manufacturing, which is already in deep doggy do anyhow.
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9284
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: Free Trade, NAFTA, etc.

Unread postby Timo » Thu 24 Mar 2016, 10:55:49

SeaGypsy wrote:Australian farmers deserve a much better deal than they have been getting from the big supermarket controlled set up. $1-2 a liter for milk is a joke considering what goes into producing it. If the Chinese want to pay $8-12 for it & the duoploly of Coles & Woolworths is broken, this is very good for Aussie dairy producers & the regions they farm. Personally I haven't been into dairy since I was a child, which seems pretty natural to me, unlike adults consuming food designed for infants of another species. The worst affected are those in general manufacturing, which is already in deep doggy do anyhow.

This reality holds true for the entire global agricultural production complex. Farmer's do not have any price control over the values of their products. Their products are treated, and traded, as commodities, and as such, they are valued according to market forces rather than production costs. The supermarket realizes that $5 per gallon of milk is not a reasonable price from the consumer's perspective. Hence, they only pay their producers half of what their consumers will pay, thus ensuring themselves of a profit as the producer/consumer middleman.

I'm a city boy who spent his summers as a kid working on a rather large family farm for my uncle. He (and most all of the smarter grain farmers across the world) built massive grain storage facilities so that he could sell his product when the price per bushel was high enough to earn him a profit on his labors. In other words, he could not control the prices paid to him for his grains, and those prices fluctuated on a daily basis. He had to respond to the market in order to earn his living.

To make this point a bit clearer (i hope) put the agricultural industry in the same context as the production of any other product the world has to offer. In nearly every other case, the producer has control over the price of the product produced. Cars, radios, computers, cellphones, furniture, clothes, beer, you name it. Agricultural products fall into the same commodity category as gold and silver and other precious gems and minerals. They are valued and traded according to market forces rather than producer control. Not fair at all. Throw in this reality into our requisite future of feeding the world with an exponentially growing population..............i have no idea how that will all play out.

Edit to add the same ignorance as to how this fits in with and and all global trade agreements. The commodity traders get richer while the farmers continue to be slaves to those who benefit from their labors. I guess.
Timo
 

Re: Free Trade, NAFTA, etc.

Unread postby americandream » Thu 24 Mar 2016, 17:52:40

Kylon wrote:There is no arguement that Free Trade increases wealth overall. The problem is that it takes wealth away from workers/middle class, while enriching financiers and industrialist.


That is a given just as a bad dose of ticks will give you the itches. There will be periodic attempts at mitigating these tendencies but eventually, it will sink into the general mindset that one either innovates into a slice of this cake as an individual would be capitalist or else, find other means (more proactive labour upskilling or perfecting the art of dissembling others through mandarining (the professional politician) or think tanking as two obvious examples. Ponzi schemes as well and of course selling speculation as a means to a livelihood. Yeah.
americandream
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 8650
Joined: Mon 18 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Free Trade, NAFTA, etc.

Unread postby Outcast_Searcher » Thu 24 Mar 2016, 18:22:15

SeaGypsy wrote:Australian farmers deserve a much better deal than they have been getting from the big supermarket controlled set up. $1-2 a liter for milk is a joke considering what goes into producing it. If the Chinese want to pay $8-12 for it & the duoploly of Coles & Woolworths is broken, this is very good for Aussie dairy producers & the regions they farm. Personally I haven't been into dairy since I was a child, which seems pretty natural to me, unlike adults consuming food designed for infants of another species. The worst affected are those in general manufacturing, which is already in deep doggy do anyhow.

With respect, shouldn't the market dictate what prices should be? Do you have EVIDENCE the Chinese are willing to pay $8 to $12 for a gallon of Aussie milk (plus shipping and whatever other fees and issues like the shipping time?)

Look, if the market says milk is worth $12.00 per gallon (and given the price of freaking cheese in the US, that wouldn't surprise me), then fine. Otherwise, blaming the supermarkets for the fact that Aussie farmers don't get multiple times what the market price is for milk -- tough. Something for nothing due to wishful thinking is NEVER a good way to run an economic system, in my experience.
Given the track record of the perma-doomer blogs, I wouldn't bet a fast crash doomer's money on their predictions.
User avatar
Outcast_Searcher
COB
COB
 
Posts: 10142
Joined: Sat 27 Jun 2009, 21:26:42
Location: Central KY

Re: Free Trade, NAFTA, etc.

Unread postby americandream » Thu 24 Mar 2016, 19:29:28

Outcast_Searcher wrote:
SeaGypsy wrote:Australian farmers deserve a much better deal than they have been getting from the big supermarket controlled set up. $1-2 a liter for milk is a joke considering what goes into producing it. If the Chinese want to pay $8-12 for it & the duoploly of Coles & Woolworths is broken, this is very good for Aussie dairy producers & the regions they farm. Personally I haven't been into dairy since I was a child, which seems pretty natural to me, unlike adults consuming food designed for infants of another species. The worst affected are those in general manufacturing, which is already in deep doggy do anyhow.

With respect, shouldn't the market dictate what prices should be? Do you have EVIDENCE the Chinese are willing to pay $8 to $12 for a gallon of Aussie milk (plus shipping and whatever other fees and issues like the shipping time?)

Look, if the market says milk is worth $12.00 per gallon (and given the price of freaking cheese in the US, that wouldn't surprise me), then fine. Otherwise, blaming the supermarkets for the fact that Aussie farmers don't get multiple times what the market price is for milk -- tough. Something for nothing due to wishful thinking is NEVER a good way to run an economic system, in my experience.


Wishful thinking never works anyway. You just get fukked over by the next milk producer in line.
americandream
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 8650
Joined: Mon 18 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Free Trade, NAFTA, etc.

Unread postby Shaved Monkey » Thu 24 Mar 2016, 20:23:32

Chinese are buying up the dairy industry in Australia and NZ to supply their demand and cut out the middle man.
So much land with enough rain fall or irrigation to support green grass that traditionally fed only 20 or 30 million now has a market of potentially a billion.
The dairy producer will be happy when he sells the farm and doesnt have to get up at 4 in the morning.
Poor consumers is going to have to get used to drinking black coffee/tea or take out a mortgage for a carton of milk.
Most will get turned into baby formula.
Theres already rationing for baby formula at supermarkets as Chinese students and Chinese locals buy up stock and ship it back to China.
Shops have been set up that ship baby formula to china in suburbs with high Chinese concentrations.
................................
When the floods hit in Qld a few years back and there was no milk in the supermarkets I remember old age pensioners taking baby formula to put in their tea,their white tea was more important than a hungry baby.
...........................
At least the FTA will drive Australian women back to breast feeding.

I drink black tea ;)
Ready to turn Zombies into WWOOFers
User avatar
Shaved Monkey
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2486
Joined: Wed 30 Mar 2011, 01:43:28

Re: Free Trade, NAFTA, etc.

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Thu 24 Mar 2016, 20:44:03

Firstly they are already paying 8-10 times Aussie prices. There are rackets all over the place buying up retail baby food & sending it to China, double to triple price after freight. Secondly, Chinese firms have to pay award wages for the workers on farms they are buying, many of whom will be ex farm owners making far less than minimum wage before the buyout. Take out the freight cost to China, middleman & retail markup, $4 a liter is not going to bankrupt anyone in Australia, that suggestion is absurd.
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9284
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: Free Trade, NAFTA, etc.

Unread postby Timo » Thu 24 Mar 2016, 21:05:53

Sea Gypsy, i'm not doubting or questioning you one bit, but you are educating me about the economic realities on the other side of the world. Most of what you're saying is news to me. All that means, i guess, is that our knowledge of news is limited to the news outlets we're exposed to. In that sense, the fact that the Chinese are buying up dairy farms in Aussie and NZ isn't news at all, in the American sense of what is and isn't news. I'm not defending that at all. In fact, i'm condemning that fact. Economics on the western side of the Pacific is simply something that us Yanks don't find that interesting. At least, that's what our sources of news lead us to believe.

Thanks for shining some light on situations we (Yanks) should be concerned about.
Timo
 

Re: Free Trade, NAFTA, etc.

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Thu 24 Mar 2016, 22:14:22

My 'expert' tag here is for Oceania & SE Asia geopolitics & economics, there are a few of us antipodeans on here though & we don't always see things the same way. My reading of the current round of trade negotiations is that they are mostly positive for Australia. They aren't going to wreck any industries which weren't already being wrecked but they will boost trade & commodity market access. There are aspects I strongly disagree with, such as the right of overseas corporations to sue onshore governments for implementing laws which interfere with their profits. A big shake up of tax is underway here also to try to make these people pay a fair share, so the situation is very much in flux.
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9284
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: Free Trade, NAFTA, etc.

Unread postby Timo » Thu 24 Mar 2016, 22:34:37

In that case, since we're on opposite sides of the Big Water, and also exposed to very different economic realities, i could easily expect that we view the TPP very differently, as well. It's all a matter of perspective. I don't doubt that the TPP would be helpful to Asian nations, but from my perspective as a Yank, it sucks. It sucks in the short term, anyway. That said, i'm also not an "expert" on much of anything, and that fact is especially scary because i was an economic advisor to our Governor and State Legislature back in the 90s. Thankfully, we had sane elected officials back then (except for the fact that they hired me!), and also thankfully, nothing i said ever turned out to be wrong. Several people didn't like me much, but that's because i was right, and advised our legislature against pursuing other people's programs, which had proven to be failures. Ce la vie, eh? (That's French Canadian.)

And for whatever it's worth, i won't claim to be right about much of anything here at PO, except for when i obviously am. 8)
Timo
 

Re: Free Trade, NAFTA, etc.

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Thu 24 Mar 2016, 23:46:13

Our 25 million vs your 12 or so times that does make for a very different set of fiscal equations. Our trade balance is largely held up by commodities, while the US is still a major manufacturer. We supply the raw products to China to compete with America, who print money to compete with China, else wages in the US would have to fall by a huge margin. It's all very complicated!
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9284
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: Free Trade, NAFTA, etc.

Unread postby Timo » Fri 25 Mar 2016, 07:52:47

SeaGypsy wrote:........ wages in the US would have to fall by a huge margin. It's all very complicated!

Nailed it! Short-term pain for long-term parity. If i wasn't alive right now, but was alive instead 100 or 200 years from now when the intended effects have materialized, i'd probably look back and think it was a good idea. Unfortunately, i've grown too attached to soft living to embrace the downgrade in my value to my fellow Yanks.

NOW! NOW! NOW! I want it NOW!

And LOTS more of it!

I'm speaking specifically of chocolate, and gold, and clean air and water, and lower global temperatures, and lower global populations, and all that good stuff.

HEY! Maybe we can design a trade agreement where all these things magically materialize! I want it now! :roll:
Timo
 

Re: THE NAFTA Thread (merged)

Unread postby Tanada » Wed 25 Jan 2017, 08:07:22

Bump
Alfred Tennyson wrote:We are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.
User avatar
Tanada
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 17050
Joined: Thu 28 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South West shore Lake Erie, OH, USA

Re: THE NAFTA Thread (merged)

Unread postby Subjectivist » Wed 25 Jan 2017, 14:19:08

If the President is serious about scrapping all multi nation trade agreements and replacing them with strictly bilateral agreements it will change everything. With these over arching agreements you have to get broad support to fix differences between anyone else and yourself. With all bilateral agreements that stops being an issue.
II Chronicles 7:14 if my people, who are called by my name, will humble themselves and pray and seek my face and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven, and I will forgive their sin and will heal their land.
Subjectivist
Volunteer
Volunteer
 
Posts: 4701
Joined: Sat 28 Aug 2010, 07:38:26
Location: Northwest Ohio

Re: NEWS THREAD

Unread postby Cog » Mon 01 Oct 2018, 11:51:51

The USMCA agreement is making the stock market soar. Nafta is dead and We are fortunate it is.
User avatar
Cog
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 13416
Joined: Sat 17 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Northern Kekistan

Re: NEWS THREAD

Unread postby yellowcanoe » Mon 01 Oct 2018, 12:31:08

Cog wrote:The USMCA agreement is making the stock market soar. Nafta is dead and We are fortunate it is.


Nafta is hardly dead -- just modified and renamed. The stock market is up because the uncertainty over the future of NAFTA is now over.
"new housing construction" is spelled h-a-b-i-t-a-t d-e-s-t-r-u-c-t-i-o-n.
yellowcanoe
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 920
Joined: Fri 15 Nov 2013, 14:42:27
Location: Ottawa, Canada

Re: NEWS THREAD

Unread postby rockdoc123 » Mon 01 Oct 2018, 12:31:50

Not sure why anyone would make a lot of noise about this agreement as if it is a major win for anybody. It doesn't appear to be.

From what I can see the US gets 3% more access to Dairy, but they were never shipping their maximum allowed into Canada under the former agreement so this seems like a non-event. My understanding is the US was exporting $500 MM in dairy products into Canada under NAFTA anyways. The supply management thing that Trump made so much noise about (and pretty much nobody in Canada outside of Quebec wants) has changed a bit with the US now being able to increase exports of eggs and poultry into Canada but again one wonders how impactful this will be. Most Canadians will buy fresh eggs, dairy and poultry meaning from local producers rather than that which is shipped in some distance. Probably more impact to the Provinces that border on US farm country.
The term on protection for drugs went up 2 years not the 4 years the US wanted. This will cost Canadians a bit more as there was a steep discount with generic drugs
Copyright terms in Canada now match those in the US and Europe (70 years after death of inventor) but from a tax income standpoint it is a wash given those estates holding copyrights will make more money, offset by those who have to license those rights. This simply brings Canada up to the levels elsewhere.
The cultural provisions in NAFTA which the Canadian government wanted to maintain in order to protect Canadian digital content remain. I think most Canadians would have been happy to see that disappear given most think the CBC sucks and are tired of yet another version of Anne of Green Gables making it onto the television screen. I suppose there are a few good shows on CBC but they are overwhelmed by complete dreck IMO.
There is no change to TN trade visas (for professionals wanting to work across borders).
There is no change to the Buy American rules that existed under NAFTA which applied to cross-border procurement.
Chapter 19 rules on trade disputes remain in place which should keep the US from dumping dairy products
There is a side letter that protects Canda and Mexico from any auto tarrifs in that it sets a maximum limit that is far above current Canadian exports of autos or parts into the US,

All in all I think this is a non-event. I'm sure it won't keep Trump from beating his chest and claiming victory though! :roll:

I saw a funny comment....when you say USMCA with a sing song voice it sounds almost like YMCA. Maybe Trump will make his staff dress up like the village people now. :P
User avatar
rockdoc123
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7685
Joined: Mon 16 May 2005, 03:00:00

PreviousNext

Return to North America Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests