Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Goldman Sachs Thread (merged)

Discussions about the economic and financial ramifications of PEAK OIL

Re: Berkshire buying $5 billion of Goldman Sachs

Unread postby copious.abundance » Wed 24 Sep 2008, 00:59:32

As I said, the conspiracy theories are alive and well here.
you don't bet $5 Billion on a bank that may or may not exist in a week. You don't even risk 10% on $5 Billion

Goldman wasn't in nearly as dire straights as the other investment banks. Nobody (except maybe you) had any doubt Goldman would still be around next week. Especially given the bailout, and given that Goldman re-classified themselves Sunday night as a regular bank, the combination of the two took away a fair amount of risk, and Buffet saw a good opportunity.
Stuff for doomers to contemplate:
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1190117.html#p1190117
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1193930.html#p1193930
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1206767.html#p1206767
User avatar
copious.abundance
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 9589
Joined: Wed 26 Mar 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Cornucopia

Re: Berkshire buying $5 billion of Goldman Sachs

Unread postby AlexdeLarge » Wed 24 Sep 2008, 01:10:53

OilFinder2 wrote:As I said, the conspiracy theories are alive and well here.


It's not a conspiracy to assume the big players talk to each other. Buffet does not gamble with that kind of money. Goldman's position is better off now with the changes, but without the bailout, I would think the price would drop even lower and it would be better to snatch it up later in the year. With the bailout, it would be a good time to buy.
Viddy well, little brother. Viddy well.
User avatar
AlexdeLarge
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1806
Joined: Tue 20 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: I have a whole ward

Re: Berkshire buying $5 billion of Goldman Sachs

Unread postby copious.abundance » Wed 24 Sep 2008, 01:45:35

AlexdeLarge wrote:
OilFinder2 wrote:As I said, the conspiracy theories are alive and well here.


It's not a conspiracy to assume the big players talk to each other.

Of course they do. I'm sure Warren Buffet's phone has been ringing off the hook for the past 3 weeks or more, with people practically begging him to bail out one or another financial institution.

But so what? Everybody knows he's got gobs of money, so who else would they call in such a time of need? Ghostbusters?

AlexdeLarge wrote:Buffet does not gamble with that kind of money. Goldman's position is better off now with the changes, but without the bailout, I would think the price would drop even lower and it would be better to snatch it up later in the year. With the bailout, it would be a good time to buy.

Agreed, it might have been the case that without the bailout, Goldman would have become even cheaper months from now - but it also would have been riskier. However, with the bailout and the switch to a traditional bank, Goldman suddenly became safer, and thus more palatable to Buffet (who tends to invest pretty conservatively). As I said, without the bailout I doubt he would have injected the $5 billion.
Stuff for doomers to contemplate:
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1190117.html#p1190117
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1193930.html#p1193930
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1206767.html#p1206767
User avatar
copious.abundance
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 9589
Joined: Wed 26 Mar 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Cornucopia

Re: Berkshire buying $5 billion of Goldman Sachs

Unread postby pup55 » Wed 24 Sep 2008, 03:01:57

Interesting. JP Morgan did exactly the same thing in 1929.

Reporters learned that an important meeting was taking place at the office of J.P. Morgan and Company, involving many of the most important men in banking. After the meeting broke, Thomas Lamont, senior partner at Morgan – a company founded by a man who had help stop a panic in 1907, made the following statement to newspaper reporters: “There has been a little distress selling on the Stock Exchange… due to a technical condition of the market” and that things were “susceptible to betterment.”

The market moved up a bit after Lamont’s statement, but the real recovery came at 1:30 pm, when self-confident Richard Whitney, vice-president of the NYSE and floor broker of J.P. Morgan and Company, walked into the exchange floor. The crowd went silent. Everyone expected an announcement that the NYSE would be closed. Instead, Richard Whitney surprised everybody…

Whitney asked for the latest bid on U.S. Steel. “195” someone shouted. Then he promptly announced that he was buying 10,000 shares of U.S. Steel at 205. He immediately received 200 shares and then left the rest of the order with the specialist. He continued to make similar orders for over a dozen more stocks. Fear evaporated as investors became worried that they would miss the new boom. The market would have closed much higher if stop loss orders from earlier that day hadn’t been triggered during the upward surge. Needless to say, the recovery on Black Thursday was impressive, but so was the massive sell off earlier in the morning that gave it its name.


About.com

Buffett has a lot more to lose if the economy goes into the toilet. He gets a sweetheart deal from Hank, on one of the remaining banks that is still functioning, giving him a chance to really fatten up if it ever turns around, and has done all he can to keep the situation from falling apart. If he succeeds, he makes a lot of money. If he fails, whether he loses 5 or 10 billion or 50, it doesn't really matter that much. So, why not do the deal?
User avatar
pup55
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5249
Joined: Wed 26 May 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Berkshire buying $5 billion of Goldman Sachs

Unread postby Pretorian » Wed 24 Sep 2008, 09:15:51

There is one thing I fail to understand with this dude. he is an overweighted 78 yo, how much does he have left to live? 3, 4, 5 years? How many of them will be worth living? Now I would understand if he needed money for whatever reason (making a puppet president somewhere, empregnating every miss universe, saving pola bears, whatever) but he doesnt. The guy eats cheap steaks and drinks cherry coke and every meal or drink can be his last one. He will die, and all that money eventually will go to thousands of different people who deserved none of it. They will eat his fortune like ants and worms eat a dead elephant. Is that what he worked for for 64 years or so?
Pretorian
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4683
Joined: Sat 08 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Somewhere there

Re: Berkshire buying $5 billion of Goldman Sachs

Unread postby smiley » Wed 24 Sep 2008, 12:23:29

There are two things which I don't understand:

1) Buffet usually buys companies, or at least a controlling stake in his companies. He doesn't like someone other than Berkshire managing his investments.

2) 10% sounds like a lot, but Buffet normaly doesn't invest in things which yield less than 20%. These yield are hard to come by at the moment, but normally he would just keep sitting on his cash. The reason they have so many cash available at this moment is because he hasn't been able to find such sweet deals in recent years.

Maybe, and I am out on a limb here, there are other interest playing. In his annual letters he mentioned a couple of years ago that he had a sizeable toxic derivate position via one of his holdings, which he wasn't able to offload.

From his letter:

But closing down a derivatives business is easier said than done. It will be a great many years before we are totally out of this operation (though we reduce our exposure daily). In fact, the reinsurance and derivatives businesses are similar: Like Hell, both are easy to enter and almost impossible to exit. In either industry, once you write a contract – which may require a large payment decades later – you are usually stuck with it. True, there are methods by which the risk can be laid off with others. But most strategies of that kind leave you with residual liability.


Could this deal also mean that he quietly could get rid of these investments via the backdoor? In that case the profit for BH would be much more than just the profit on GS stocks.

I guess the FED would also like to keep this quiet. It is one thing if some greedy bankers get burned. It is another thing if the most valued investers fall for the same trap.
User avatar
smiley
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2274
Joined: Fri 16 Apr 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Europe

Re: Berkshire buying $5 billion of Goldman Sachs

Unread postby greenworm » Wed 24 Sep 2008, 12:51:24

I see conspiracy theories are alive and well on this forum.


Are you saying Warring Buffett didn't buy gold right after some buildings went down? Cause your wrong.

Or are you saying his intentions were based on calculated economic principles? Cause your wrong.

Are you saying there wasn't a meeting with this clown and the other clowns on a golf course? Cause your wrong.

The conspiracy theories are alive and well, but your ability to think is dead as a door nail.


:lol: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
greenworm
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 862
Joined: Fri 27 Jan 2006, 04:00:00

Re: Berkshire buying $5 billion of Goldman Sachs

Unread postby ReverseEngineer » Wed 24 Sep 2008, 14:32:15

greenworm wrote:
I see conspiracy theories are alive and well on this forum.


Are you saying Warring Buffett didn't buy gold right after some buildings went down? Cause your wrong.

Or are you saying his intentions were based on calculated economic principles? Cause your wrong.

Are you saying there wasn't a meeting with this clown and the other clowns on a golf course? Cause your wrong.

The conspiracy theories are alive and well, but your ability to think is dead as a door nail.



While he has enormous Paper Wealth, Warren is not in the Seat of Power. His assets are as subject to anyone else's at being seized. If he did NOT pour some of the money into Goldman to keep it liquid, he was done for.

Warren is not the Bank. He is just a big investor who has all the paper wealth he organized up over the last 40 years IN the bank. He doesn't hold the keys to the bank.

Get real folks. The Money is ALL in the hands of the ARMY now, and those who control the army.

Reverse Engineer
User avatar
ReverseEngineer
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3352
Joined: Wed 16 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Berkshire buying $5 billion of Goldman Sachs

Unread postby greenworm » Wed 24 Sep 2008, 18:53:12

Get real folks. The Money is ALL in the hands of the ARMY now, and those who control the army.


Huh? :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
greenworm
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 862
Joined: Fri 27 Jan 2006, 04:00:00

Re: Berkshire buying $5 billion of Goldman Sachs

Unread postby AlexdeLarge » Thu 25 Sep 2008, 08:55:08

SEC will be probing possible insider trading due to a $5.00/share bump right at the end of trading, before Bershire broke the news later that night.
Viddy well, little brother. Viddy well.
User avatar
AlexdeLarge
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1806
Joined: Tue 20 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: I have a whole ward

Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley to be nationalized?

Unread postby Cid_Yama » Fri 10 Oct 2008, 04:47:15

A guest on Worldwide Exchange on CNBC said Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley would be nationalized this weekend.

The talking head quickly stated this was one man's opinion.
"For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth; to know the worst and provide for it." - Patrick Henry

The level of injustice and wrong you endure is directly determined by how much you quietly submit to. Even to the point of extinction.
User avatar
Cid_Yama
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7169
Joined: Sun 27 May 2007, 03:00:00
Location: The Post Peak Oil Historian

Re: Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley to be nationalized?

Unread postby ReverseEngineer » Fri 10 Oct 2008, 04:59:09

Cid_Yama wrote:A guest on Worldwide Exchange on CNBC said Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley would be nationalized this weekend.

The talking head quickly stated this was one man's opinion.


I would expect this has to happen. The game of mergers is over between the banks, the Gooberment has to take it all over now to try to keep the system functioning in some way. WHAT way though I am without a clue on.

I'm considering internal price fixing on all goods currently on shelves. Nationalization of all shipping and trucking companies. Government guarantees providing the equivalent of letters of credit to get the goods moving off the docks to specific locations deemed essential for national security.

Beyond that, I have no clue how security issues are addressed within individual communities left out of the loop.

Reverse Engineer
User avatar
ReverseEngineer
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3352
Joined: Wed 16 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley to be nationalized?

Unread postby Cid_Yama » Fri 10 Oct 2008, 11:07:17

GS down 13%

MS down 28%
"For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth; to know the worst and provide for it." - Patrick Henry

The level of injustice and wrong you endure is directly determined by how much you quietly submit to. Even to the point of extinction.
User avatar
Cid_Yama
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7169
Joined: Sun 27 May 2007, 03:00:00
Location: The Post Peak Oil Historian

Re: Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley to be nationalized?

Unread postby Gebari » Fri 10 Oct 2008, 12:03:50

GS down 21%
MS down 36%

They could well be doomed. What shockwaves that would send...
User avatar
Gebari
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 80
Joined: Sun 29 Jun 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Great Britan

Re: Morgan Stanley & Goldman Sachs might lose credit rat

Unread postby RdSnt » Fri 10 Oct 2008, 14:36:04

I would like to see both of them sink into a black hole. These two entities, particularly GS are leading agents for this mess. H. Paulson is a prince of thieves on Wallthief and should be in jail.

Here's what should be done, before any global plan is considered. All the elite thieves must put their entire personal wealth up as collateral to back whatever ideas they wish to put forward.
If their plan works, they may get to keep at least some of their wealth.
Gravity is not a force, it is a boundary layer.
Everything is coincident.
Love: the state of suspended anticipation.
To get any appreciable distance from the Earth in
a sensible amount of time, you must lie.
User avatar
RdSnt
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1461
Joined: Wed 02 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Canada

I pledge allegiance to Goldman Sachs

Unread postby Delphis » Thu 16 Oct 2008, 18:11:19

"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe."....Albert Einstein
User avatar
Delphis
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 169
Joined: Tue 09 Sep 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Hobbiton, but it's looking more like Mordor by the day...oh! hey Sauron, I didn't see you behind me!

Has The Goldman Sachs "Super Spike" Happened?

Unread postby bratticus » Fri 07 Nov 2008, 00:15:20

Well...maybe the price didn't hit $250 or $200/barrel but it sure looks like a SuperSpike in hindsight.

Image

[hr]
Goldman "super spike" analyst cuts oil forecast

Fri Sep 19, 2008 12:30pm EDT

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Goldman Sachs energy equities analyst Arjun Murti, one of the first to predict $100 a barrel crude, cut his 2009 oil price forecast to $110 from $140 a barrel this week due to global economic weakness.
User avatar
bratticus
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 2368
Joined: Thu 12 Jun 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Bratislava

Re: Has The Goldman Sachs "Super Spike" Happened?

Unread postby seldom_seen » Fri 07 Nov 2008, 00:42:03

I think what we've seen so far would be better classified as a speed bump, compared to what could happen when a significant supply drop has a head on collision with the printing press.
seldom_seen
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2229
Joined: Tue 12 Apr 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Has The Goldman Sachs "Super Spike" Happened?

Unread postby zoidberg » Fri 07 Nov 2008, 01:11:50

I think this is what he meant. I don't know what he envisaged happening afterwards, seems to have lost his touch with this last bit of volatility, but really this is unprecedented in human experience. Its got everyone off balance, in all markets including the oil one. I'd bet the next spike happens 3q 2009, but hell I didnt see $70 either so who knows.
User avatar
zoidberg
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 635
Joined: Wed 23 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Center of north america

Re: Has The Goldman Sachs "Super Spike" Happened?

Unread postby bantri » Fri 07 Nov 2008, 01:22:14

The most important part it´s not the spike, it´s the exponential growth observed in another similar chart:

Oil Price Chart Too Big For This Website.
User avatar
bantri
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 43
Joined: Thu 24 Feb 2005, 04:00:00

PreviousNext

Return to Economics & Finance

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: theluckycountry and 46 guests