Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Ghawar Thread (merged)

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

Re: Halliburton Coaxing More From Ghawar

Unread postby eastbay » Sun 08 Nov 2009, 13:02:51

ian807 wrote:The fact that this is becoming necessary is not particularly good news.



That's what I was thinking. It's the final draw.
Got Dharma?

Everything is Impermanent. Shakyamuni Buddha
User avatar
eastbay
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7186
Joined: Sat 18 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: One Mile From the Columbia River

Re: Halliburton Coaxing More From Ghawar

Unread postby Maddog78 » Sun 08 Nov 2009, 13:14:57

Congrats to Halco.
Jobs for the boys.
User avatar
Maddog78
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1626
Joined: Mon 14 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Halliburton Coaxing More From Ghawar

Unread postby deMolay » Sun 08 Nov 2009, 13:36:41

Ghawar field, the world's largest, is a long asymmetric structure that is 230 kilometers long and approximately 30 miles wide however the width diminishes going south.The The announcement makes no mention of Ain Dar, the most mature part of Ghawar in the extreme northwestern region of the field. Ain Dar has been under pressure maintenance by peripheral water injection for over 40 years. Ain Dar (and other parts of the field) began producing salt water in the late 1970s and by 2005, the cut was 42%. All of Ain Dar was wet since 1984. Once water became a major problem, many existing vertical wells were converted to short lateral horizontals running along the top 10 feet of the Arab D zone, the main pay. New wells were drilled horizontally to the same layer. Today, the redevelopment process has gone on so long that future oil production from Ain Dar is speculative. Shedgum, adjacent to Ain Dar on the east, is not much better off. Both regions began oil production in 1951. Uthmaniyah was developed after Ain Dar and Shedgum were fully developed with vertical wells on 1 square kilometer spacing. It is somewhat narrower and the thickness of the Arab D is less.Reservoir quality is diminished. Hawiyah, narrower than Uthmaniyah and to the south of it, was then developed. Reservoir quality is further diminished. In Haradh, developed in the 1970s, reservoir quality is so poor that vertical wells have less than one fourth the productivity of the northern regions. In 1983 with reservoir pressure falling rapidly, the region was shut in. Following increased demand as the result of the invasion of Kuwait, in 1990, these shut in wells were returned to production. Redevelopment began in 1996 with horizontal and multilateral wells. The southernmost section of Haradh, known as Haradh III came on stream in February of 2006. Today, the entire field still contains a great deal of crude oil but it is much harder to get and the production rates continue to fall off. Halliburton's mandate will be to deal with higher and higher water cuts, utilize all known new technology to hold rates as high as possible and stimulate wells as required. The total number of wells drilled in Ghawar exceeds one thousand including hundreds of vertical wells that have either been abandoned or converted to horizontals. Now Halliburton will drill even more trying to improve rate and lessen decline. It is a good, long-term contract and a tall order for the company.


Michael Lynch consults with leading institutions through GLG
Questions for the authorMichael Lynch

Consultant, Michael E. Lynch
"We Are All Travellers, From The Sweet Grass To The Packing House, From Birth To Death, We Wander Between The Two Eternities". An Old Cowboy.
User avatar
deMolay
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2671
Joined: Sun 04 Sep 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Halliburton Coaxing More From Ghawar

Unread postby SilentRunning » Sun 08 Nov 2009, 14:29:30

It sounds like they are pulling out all the stops to keep production up. This means that the inevitable decline will be more like a cliff - and when Ghawar does that it will become obvious to all that maybe, just maybe there is something to this "Peak Oil" thing after all.

This news story seems to me to be the most candid admission that Ghawar is in fact terminal and that will be seeing if Matthew Simmons was correct in the very near future. Hold on hats folks. Get those plans implemented - and quick.
Send more Cornicopians!
The last ones were delicious!!! :-)
User avatar
SilentRunning
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 120
Joined: Fri 27 Mar 2009, 23:46:50
Location: Northeastern North America

Re: Halliburton Coaxing More From Ghawar

Unread postby kiwichick » Sun 08 Nov 2009, 19:02:57

didnt simmons say that when ghawar was declining we are post peak?
User avatar
kiwichick
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2267
Joined: Sat 02 Aug 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Southland New Zealand

Re: Halliburton Coaxing More From Ghawar

Unread postby Daniel_Plainview » Sun 08 Nov 2009, 20:15:08

The total number of wells drilled in Ghawar exceeds one thousand including hundreds of vertical wells that have either been abandoned or converted to horizontals. Now Halliburton will drill even more trying to improve rate and lessen decline.


LOL. Ghawar will look like an overstuffed pincushion by the time Halliburton has squeezed the final drops from this terminal oilfield.
User avatar
Daniel_Plainview
Prognosticator
Prognosticator
 
Posts: 4220
Joined: Tue 06 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: 7035 Hollis ... Near the Observatory ... Just down the way, tucked back in the small woods

Re: Halliburton Coaxing More From Ghawar

Unread postby NoWorries » Sun 08 Nov 2009, 20:44:31

I thought Michael Lynch was a big Peak Oil sceptic? But this is the 2nd item I've seen from him in the past 4 months where he seems to imply trouble ahead.

What gives?

And I note the item says there's still "lots" of crude left in that field -- it's just harder to reach. Nevertheless, the whole tone of the item suggests the easy oil from Ghawar is .....gone.
User avatar
NoWorries
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 177
Joined: Thu 05 Jun 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Halliburton Coaxing More From Ghawar

Unread postby Plantagenet » Sun 08 Nov 2009, 22:53:24

Who cares what Michael Lynch says----the guy is clueless.

Image
This is the time to acknowledge the prescience of Matt Simmon's work on Ghawar.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26619
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

Re: Halliburton Coaxing More From Ghawar

Unread postby copious.abundance » Sun 08 Nov 2009, 23:18:38

NoWorries wrote: thought Michael Lynch was a big Peak Oil sceptic? But this is the 2nd item I've seen from him in the past 4 months where he seems to imply trouble ahead.

This is not the same Micheal Lynch.
Stuff for doomers to contemplate:
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1190117.html#p1190117
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1193930.html#p1193930
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1206767.html#p1206767
User avatar
copious.abundance
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 9589
Joined: Wed 26 Mar 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Cornucopia

Re: Halliburton Coaxing More From Ghawar

Unread postby Homesteader » Mon 09 Nov 2009, 04:15:39

Halliburton to coax more oil out of largely depleted Ghawar fieldNovember 7, 2009


The title says it all. The rest is details.
"The era of procrastination, of half-measures, of soothing and baffling expedients, of delays, is coming to a close. In its place we are entering a period of consequences…"
Sir Winston Churchill

Beliefs are what people fall back on when the facts make them uncomfortable.
User avatar
Homesteader
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1856
Joined: Thu 12 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Economic Nomad

Re: Halliburton Coaxing More From Ghawar

Unread postby deMolay » Mon 09 Nov 2009, 08:35:22

The skeptics can skeptic, the scoffers can scoff, but the fact is Simmons has been right all along. The question now is how long until the last drop drips into the bucket. The final removal of Ghawar from production will have what ramifications for the Saudi's. In other words what will be the short term effects, and long term effects. I know you guys have the answers better than I.
"We Are All Travellers, From The Sweet Grass To The Packing House, From Birth To Death, We Wander Between The Two Eternities". An Old Cowboy.
User avatar
deMolay
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2671
Joined: Sun 04 Sep 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Halliburton Coaxing More From Ghawar

Unread postby deMolay » Mon 09 Nov 2009, 09:35:25

A good graphic that shows water injection method. http://satelliteoerthedesert.blogspot.com/
"We Are All Travellers, From The Sweet Grass To The Packing House, From Birth To Death, We Wander Between The Two Eternities". An Old Cowboy.
User avatar
deMolay
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2671
Joined: Sun 04 Sep 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Halliburton Coaxing More From Ghawar

Unread postby mcgowanjm » Mon 09 Nov 2009, 09:48:48

deMolay wrote:The final removal of Ghawar from production will have what ramifications for the Saudi's. In other words what will be the short term effects, and long term effects.


Saudi jets dropping phosphorous bombs on Yemeni's
as we type.
mcgowanjm
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2455
Joined: Fri 23 May 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Halliburton Coaxing More From Ghawar

Unread postby mos6507 » Mon 09 Nov 2009, 10:12:21

So, shorty, what say you to this?
mos6507
 

Re: Halliburton Coaxing More From Ghawar

Unread postby deMolay » Mon 09 Nov 2009, 11:17:34

Removing Cantrell and Ghawar, what will be the effects on global oil prices, and supplies. I know this info is here on PO, but for this thread, ramifications to the USA and global prices and supplies?
"We Are All Travellers, From The Sweet Grass To The Packing House, From Birth To Death, We Wander Between The Two Eternities". An Old Cowboy.
User avatar
deMolay
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2671
Joined: Sun 04 Sep 2005, 03:00:00

PreviousNext

Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 114 guests