Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

South Korea Thread (merged)

A forum for discussion of regional topics including oil depletion but also government, society, and the future.

Re: S. Korea to cut oil tax if oil hits $170

Unread postby copious.abundance » Sun 06 Jul 2008, 20:29:08

wisconsin_cur wrote:
OilFinder2 wrote: Sorry to say, but oil demand in Korea is a bit more elastic than you think.


or not?

Crude inventories in S. Korea,

SEOUL, June 20 (Reuters) - South Korea's commercial crude inventory fell nearly 37 percent by end-May from a year ago as high oil prices continued to discourage refiners from making new purchases, state-run Korea National Oil Corp (KNOC) said Friday.


37%... ouch

South Korean oil demand has been flat for several years. It would be nice to see actual recent figures, but I'd be willing to bet that much of the decline in crude imports represents decreased demand.

A decrease in storage does not necessarily mean a lack of supply, it could mean they don't want to have $140 oil sitting around idle in storage. It's getting too expensive to keep in storage, so they take a "lean inventory" approach.

Same goes with US storage, I might add.
Stuff for doomers to contemplate:
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1190117.html#p1190117
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1193930.html#p1193930
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1206767.html#p1206767
User avatar
copious.abundance
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 9589
Joined: Wed 26 Mar 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Cornucopia

Re: S. Korea to cut oil tax if oil hits $170

Unread postby copious.abundance » Sun 06 Jul 2008, 20:33:36

OilFinder2 wrote:South Korean oil demand has been flat for several years.

As I said.

South Korean oil demand through 2006.

Image
source
Stuff for doomers to contemplate:
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1190117.html#p1190117
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1193930.html#p1193930
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1206767.html#p1206767
User avatar
copious.abundance
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 9589
Joined: Wed 26 Mar 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Cornucopia

Re: S. Korea to cut oil tax if oil hits $170

Unread postby wisconsin_cur » Sun 06 Jul 2008, 20:35:01

OilFinder2 wrote:
wisconsin_cur wrote:
OilFinder2 wrote: Sorry to say, but oil demand in Korea is a bit more elastic than you think.


or not?

Crude inventories in S. Korea,

SEOUL, June 20 (Reuters) - South Korea's commercial crude inventory fell nearly 37 percent by end-May from a year ago as high oil prices continued to discourage refiners from making new purchases, state-run Korea National Oil Corp (KNOC) said Friday.


37%... ouch

South Korean oil demand has been flat for several years. It would be nice to see actual recent figures, but I'd be willing to bet that much of the decline in crude imports represents decreased demand.

A decrease in storage does not necessarily mean a lack of supply, it could mean they don't want to have $140 oil sitting around idle in storage. It's getting too expensive to keep in storage, so they take a "lean inventory" approach.

Same goes with US storage, I might add.


You quoted a decline in imports. I demonstrated that a decline in imports has been more than accounted for by a decrease in stocks year over year.

No one claimed they could not buy it, only that it (more than) accounts for your noted drop in imports, negating your argument about elasticity of demand. period.
http://www.thenewfederalistpapers.com
User avatar
wisconsin_cur
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4576
Joined: Thu 10 May 2007, 03:00:00
Location: 45 degrees North. 883 feet above sealevel.

Re: S. Korea to cut oil tax if oil hits $170

Unread postby cube » Sun 06 Jul 2008, 20:43:52

Hogan wrote:S. Korea to cut oil tax if oil hits $170

The plans follow a 10.5 trillion won ($10.01 billion) package introduced last month to ease the financial burden of high oil prices on low-income individuals and self-owned businesses.

The government said last month it would come up with extra contingency plans, including a cut in oil taxes, if Dubai oil tops $170 a barrel.

link

Subsidizing. Have to keep that economic ball rolling.
This is why I always have a good laugh whenever anyone proposes a "government solution". :lol:
//
I fully expect government (to do what gov. always does best) tax the productive part of the economy and subsidize the failing part.
cube
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3909
Joined: Sat 12 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Re: S. Korea to cut oil tax if oil hits $170

Unread postby misterno » Sun 06 Jul 2008, 23:09:15

OilFinder2 wrote:
OilFinder2 wrote:South Korean oil demand has been flat for several years.

As I said.

South Korean oil demand through 2006.

Image
source


South Korea has been growing with positive % for many years. So how come their demand is flat for so many years?
Anyone care to comment?
User avatar
misterno
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 843
Joined: Wed 07 Mar 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Somewhere super boring

Re: S. Korea to cut oil tax if oil hits $170

Unread postby wisconsin_cur » Sun 06 Jul 2008, 23:16:42

Efficiency can carry you for quite a while. Here in the ol' US of A, efficiency is the biggest oil gusher to be found.

You do reach a point where the returns start to diminish.

Unfortunately for the S. Koreans they spent that margin when oil was "cheap" and now they are facing high prices when all of the low fruit has already been picked.
http://www.thenewfederalistpapers.com
User avatar
wisconsin_cur
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4576
Joined: Thu 10 May 2007, 03:00:00
Location: 45 degrees North. 883 feet above sealevel.

Re: S. Korea to cut oil tax if oil hits $170

Unread postby DantesPeak » Sun 06 Jul 2008, 23:30:28

misterno wrote:
OilFinder2 wrote:
OilFinder2 wrote:South Korean oil demand has been flat for several years.

As I said.

South Korean oil demand through 2006.



South Korea has been growing with positive % for many years. So how come their demand is flat for so many years?
Anyone care to comment?


Part of the answer is that they import more oil than they need, then refine and export the surplus as gasoline - including to the US up until recently.


Reuters - Thursday, June 26
South Korean top refiner SK Energy's ability to export at least 120,000 tonnes of gasoline each month from its new 60,000-bpd residual fluid catalytic cracker from July has also helped boost supplies.


Yahoo
It's already over, now it's just a matter of adjusting.
User avatar
DantesPeak
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 6277
Joined: Sat 23 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: New Jersey

Re: S. Korea to cut oil tax if oil hits $170

Unread postby copious.abundance » Sun 06 Jul 2008, 23:33:37

^
Thanks. I was wondering if that might be the case, but wasn't sure.
Stuff for doomers to contemplate:
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1190117.html#p1190117
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1193930.html#p1193930
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1206767.html#p1206767
User avatar
copious.abundance
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 9589
Joined: Wed 26 Mar 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Cornucopia

Re: S. Korea to cut oil tax if oil hits $170

Unread postby wisconsin_cur » Mon 07 Jul 2008, 10:34:40

OilFinder2 wrote:
Image
source



I was thinking about this graph as I went to sleep (yes, I accept that I have a problem).

It has leveled after a ~4 fold increase in about ten years what would that me something like 30% annual growth?). Would that be an instance of a newly rich nation utylizing that wealth until they reached a point of saturation (ie those who are going to buy cars and the like have already bought them)?

For a break down of increase in type of fuel used over the period in question
http://www.thenewfederalistpapers.com
User avatar
wisconsin_cur
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4576
Joined: Thu 10 May 2007, 03:00:00
Location: 45 degrees North. 883 feet above sealevel.

Re: S. Korea to cut oil tax if oil hits $170

Unread postby copious.abundance » Mon 07 Jul 2008, 21:30:02

^
You also have to remember that South Korea is a VERY crowded nation. Your point about saturation is no doubt correct, but also it's probably a case of . . . well, there's not much more room on the freeways anymore, and in the meantime they've built super-duper subways, trains, etc. to help people get around.

Could also be that industry is using more coal and/or natural gas (or even nuclear for all I know) and less oil.
Stuff for doomers to contemplate:
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1190117.html#p1190117
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1193930.html#p1193930
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1206767.html#p1206767
User avatar
copious.abundance
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 9589
Joined: Wed 26 Mar 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Cornucopia

Re: S. Korea to cut oil tax if oil hits $170

Unread postby wisconsin_cur » Mon 07 Jul 2008, 21:33:49

Nuclear is very big there for electric generation but it doesn't look like they every used "much" oil for electric generation.
http://www.thenewfederalistpapers.com
User avatar
wisconsin_cur
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4576
Joined: Thu 10 May 2007, 03:00:00
Location: 45 degrees North. 883 feet above sealevel.

Korean Case Study In Government Education

Unread postby mattduke » Mon 17 Nov 2008, 14:03:55

Turns out the government is keenly interested in "educating" the population about itself.

iht
User avatar
mattduke
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3591
Joined: Fri 28 Oct 2005, 03:00:00

South Korea tries recharging road to power vehicles

Unread postby yesplease » Fri 22 May 2009, 02:59:24

South Korea's top technology university has developed a plan to power electric cars through recharging strips embedded in roadways that use a technology to transfer energy found in some electric toothbrushes.

The plan, still in the experimental stage, calls for placing power strips about 20 cm (8 inches) to 90 cm (35 inches) wide and perhaps several hundred meters long built into the top of roads.

Vehicles with sensor-driven magnetic devices on their underside can suck up energy as they travel over the strips without coming into direct contact.

"If we place these strips on about 10 percent of roadways in a city, we could power electric vehicles," said Cho Dong-ho, the manager of the "online electric vehicle" plan at the Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology.


Link
Last edited by Ferretlover on Fri 05 Jun 2009, 20:23:52, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Merged with THE South Korea Thread.
Professor Membrane wrote: Not now son, I'm making ... TOAST!
User avatar
yesplease
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3765
Joined: Tue 03 Oct 2006, 03:00:00

~

Unread postby yesplease » Fri 22 May 2009, 03:05:37

Here's a link to what they're probably using for inductive charging. While ~40% charging efficiency isn't great, the system would be very convenient in dense cities, and probably allay a lot of fears about being stranded.
Professor Membrane wrote: Not now son, I'm making ... TOAST!
User avatar
yesplease
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3765
Joined: Tue 03 Oct 2006, 03:00:00

Re: South Korea tries recharging road to power vehicles

Unread postby outcast » Fri 22 May 2009, 04:26:09

Good idea.
Y2K is real. Y2K is going to rock our world.
-Kunstler

Don't respond, I'll just ignore it.
-MonteQuest
User avatar
outcast
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 885
Joined: Mon 21 Apr 2008, 03:00:00

Re: South Korea tries recharging road to power vehicles

Unread postby Schmuto » Fri 22 May 2009, 07:03:17

This seems like a ridiculous suggestion given YesPlease's assertion that we'll be running our EV cars on 10" battery cubes soon.

Have you called them yet YP? :roll:
June 5, 09. Taking a powder for at least a while - big change of life coming up.
-
We're saved! YesPlease promises that we'll be running cars on battery cubes about the size of a toaster.
Schmuto
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 659
Joined: Wed 17 Dec 2008, 04:00:00

Re: South Korea tries recharging road to power vehicles

Unread postby Tanada » Fri 22 May 2009, 07:15:15

Heck with 10% of the grid being fitted, just put them for four car leangths at every stop light, when you have to stop on red you get a 30 second period of charging. You could also easily install these in parking spaces, hidden and safe from vandalism.
Alfred Tennyson wrote:We are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.
User avatar
Tanada
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 17055
Joined: Thu 28 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South West shore Lake Erie, OH, USA

Re: South Korea tries recharging road to power vehicles

Unread postby Gerben » Fri 22 May 2009, 10:41:09

Traffic lights sounds like a good place to start. For parking I'd prefer the old-fashioned way with a cable: more efficient.
This kind of infrastructure does not sound cheap however, so not sure it's worth using in cities. The bottleneck for EVs is longer distance travelling. Recharging at traffic lights doesn't solve that. We should equip a highway lane with this stuff.
User avatar
Gerben
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 629
Joined: Wed 07 Mar 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Holland, Belgica Foederata (Republic of the Seven United Netherlands)

Re: South Korea tries recharging road to power vehicles

Unread postby PrestonSturges » Fri 22 May 2009, 13:51:45

Red lights would be great because people would stop for yellow lights to be the first in line to get the power strip!
User avatar
PrestonSturges
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6052
Joined: Wed 15 Oct 2008, 03:00:00

Re: South Korea tries recharging road to power vehicles

Unread postby Forester » Fri 22 May 2009, 16:46:51

In an ironic fashion, I can also see public-access charge-as-you-go schemes like this resulting in an increased number of stalled EVs on the side of the road. Assuming that charging strips will be in limited areas (i.e. first four car-lengths at stoplights, some streets in cities, etc.), I can see people pushing their vehicles too far in the hope or assumption that they will fortuitously land on a recharge strip somewhere along the line. Then, surprise, surprise, they hit all green lights and run out of juice, or go empty sitting in traffic.

To me, taking the burden of keeping a vehicle fueled/charged away from the user is a bad idea. Where would the money to pay for the electricity coursing through these strips come from?
User avatar
Forester
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 11
Joined: Fri 25 Jan 2008, 04:00:00
Location: Atlanta

PreviousNext

Return to Asia Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests