jedrider wrote:If scientists UNDERESTIMATED global warming, you know what that means?
It means we use the scientists projections as a best case scenario and we then guess what may happen with scenarios increasingly dire.
Plantagenet wrote:jedrider wrote:If scientists UNDERESTIMATED global warming, you know what that means?
It means we use the scientists projections as a best case scenario and we then guess what may happen with scenarios increasingly dire.
Sounds good, but back here in the real world there is no real response to global warming. The Paris Accords are a sham, as the emissions targets are voluntary and most countries aren't meeting even those voluntary targets.
Thats why Greta Thunberg is going to Madrid to protest....this is the second time the UN has passed a "sham" accord with no teeth and Greta isn't going to put up with that.
Cheers!![]()
asg70 wrote:I doubt she would "put up" with unrestricted discretionary plane travel either. But go ahead and keep squeeing and gushing over her despite how she'd give you the stink-eye over your lifestyle if she met you face to face.
EnergyUnlimited wrote:Much more thought need to be given to the way we try to reduce CO2 emissions.
asg70 wrote:EnergyUnlimited wrote:Much more thought need to be given to the way we try to reduce CO2 emissions.
These arguments are raised only to stall and defend the status quo.
Ibon wrote:The human condition always looks for external forces to be the savior, whether it be a creator, technology or the dystopian force of peak oil or climate change. This great moment around the corner when all will be corrected.
.
vtsnowedin wrote:Ibon wrote:The human condition always looks for external forces to be the savior, whether it be a creator, technology or the dystopian force of peak oil or climate change. This great moment around the corner when all will be corrected.
.
More likely the great moment around the corner when all will be undone and destroyed.
jedrider wrote:Who's to gain from global warming?
Russia? Perhaps. They have the territory in the right place.
Canada? No. They'll have the U.S. all over them in that case.
China? They want to be the last man standing. They probably will be.
jedrider wrote:Who's to gain from global warming?
Russia? Perhaps. They have the territory in the right place.
Canada? No. They'll have the U.S. all over them in that case.
China? They want to be the last man standing. They probably will be.
dissident wrote:. Humanity's industrial civilization will have been long gone by the time stability is restored.
Return to Environment, Weather & Climate
Users browsing this forum: clif and 6 guests