OTOH, Franken-food will be a hell of a lot better than mass starvation, to the people at risk for that in, say, poor African countries.
And given the way the average person eats in the first world (me included for my first 40 years as an adult when it didn't seem to matter re medical test results or my weight), it's not like Franken-food, from Chicken McNuggets, to the sugar and salt they cram into nearly every packaged and restaurant food served for better flavor and preservation, and endless other examples is exactly a large issue to the VAST majority of folks in the first world, now is it? Oh, and people in the poorer regions, again, will go for what they find affordable, not very expensive supposedly "organic super-food".
After all, there's a reason a common joke is to call Whole Foods "whole paycheck".
I think far too many people make the imperfect the enemy of the good, or at least the enemy of the HELL OF A LOT BETTER than nothing. I'm almost certain that 99% of starving or routinely hungry people won't be among them.
...
Now, would all "perfectly healthy" food be nice in a perfect world? ABSOLUTELY. But when we live in anything REMOTELY approaching that world, be sure and let us know. I'm no fast crash doomer, but I don't believe in magic cornucopian dreams of perfection either.
Given the track record of the perma-doomer blogs, I wouldn't bet a fast crash doomer's money on their predictions.