Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Terror / Terrorism Thread pt 4 (merged)

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: Why did cops not take out Sydney terrorist?

Unread postby Subjectivist » Tue 16 Dec 2014, 10:02:46

SeaGypsy wrote:It takes two minutes to find multiple camera shots showing definite perfect sniper opportunities, both before sunset & after.

Then he killed the lights.

Cops had clear shots in daylight with at least some contact with hostages & the terrorist.

The cops then had two hours of night vision which the gunman did not have.

I cannot for the life of me figure why this guy was not popped alone.


Movies aside shooting anyone through a plate glass window is not like Shining a laser at them. Thick windows cause deflection, if you are shooting anything but perpendicular to the surface you are shooting through. Sure you can see the target, but the glass is going to shift the trajectory of a bullet in ways that are only partially predictable.
II Chronicles 7:14 if my people, who are called by my name, will humble themselves and pray and seek my face and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven, and I will forgive their sin and will heal their land.
Subjectivist
Volunteer
Volunteer
 
Posts: 4701
Joined: Sat 28 Aug 2010, 07:38:26
Location: Northwest Ohio

Re: Why did cops not take out Sydney terrorist?

Unread postby dinopello » Tue 16 Dec 2014, 10:15:31

A better Hollywood solution would be to pump some odorless gas in the ventilation system that knocks everyone out. Any of you watch that British series Black Mirror ? I've only watched the 1st but this event reminds me of that a bit. The use of hostage with social media and the attempted engagement with the prime minister. It's a new world for psychopaths.
User avatar
dinopello
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6088
Joined: Fri 13 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: The Urban Village

Re: Why did cops not take out Sydney terrorist?

Unread postby Withnail » Tue 16 Dec 2014, 10:24:32

dinopello wrote:A better Hollywood solution would be to pump some odorless gas in the ventilation system that knocks everyone out. Any of you watch that British series Black Mirror ? I've only watched the 1st but this event reminds me of that a bit. The use of hostage with social media and the attempted engagement with the prime minister. It's a new world for psychopaths.


or you could covertly put nozzles in under doors or through walls and then pump in some kind of explosively expanding foam that harmlessly immobilises everybody.
Withnail
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1306
Joined: Sat 19 Jul 2014, 16:45:10

Re: Why did cops not take out Sydney terrorist?

Unread postby Scrub Puller » Tue 16 Dec 2014, 16:11:35

Yair . . . I have the same thoughts as SeaGypsy . . . I just don't get it.

There is more going on here than what we are being told.

I have no military training but was once a (much) better than average marksman and have a good understanding of animal and human behaviour.

They knew there was only one offender, they knew what he looked like, there was no chance he could be confused with one of the hostages and yet they shag around for seventeen bloody hours.

As has been mentioned, you can't shoot through plate glass but surely some way could have been devised to get a shot in from the kitchen, through the ceiling, aircon ducting or what all.

One shot was all that was needed and yet they go in with flash bangs and (I think) automatic fire. For mine it was a balls-up of the highest order.

Cheers.
Scrub Puller
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 296
Joined: Sun 07 Apr 2013, 13:20:59

Re: Why did cops not take out Sydney terrorist?

Unread postby Shaved Monkey » Tue 16 Dec 2014, 17:29:25

They would have a pretty good psychological profile of this guy he was known to ASIO (aussie version of CIA) and the police.
He deliberately started this directly opposite the Channel 7 live TV broadcast.
Angry man who's demands were pretty mild,he wanted a good public rant on all media and was going to release hostages every time he got a rant.
He allowed hostages to take medicine,drink water and take toilet breaks.(not really what you do if you are going to kill them???)
Pretty sure the psych negotiators were aware of what he was going to do
He was falling asleep having not killed anyone,when one of the hostages tried to get the gun of him and got shot.
In hindsight he probably only needed to wait another half hour or so.
It will be interesting to see if the people killed were killed by the police accidentally.
But they had no other choice when they heard gun shots.

Its a sad story on many levels
Ready to turn Zombies into WWOOFers
User avatar
Shaved Monkey
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2486
Joined: Wed 30 Mar 2011, 01:43:28

Re: Why did cops not take out Sydney terrorist?

Unread postby Oneaboveall » Tue 16 Dec 2014, 18:46:09

dinopello wrote:A better Hollywood solution would be to pump some odorless gas in the ventilation system that knocks everyone out...

It doesn't work in real life like it did when Batman and Wonder Woman got it on TV. The Russians used a knockout gas in 2002 when Chechens took hostages in Moscow and it killed over a 100 people.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moscow_hos ... ical_agent
When the banksters want something, our policymakers move with the speed of Mercury and the determination of Ares. It’s only when the rest of us need something that there is paralysis.

How free are we today with the dominance of globalist capital and militarized security apparatus?
Oneaboveall
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 631
Joined: Mon 01 Nov 2010, 17:56:45

Re: Why did cops not take out Sydney terrorist?

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Tue 16 Dec 2014, 18:48:23

The several comments about difficulty shooting through plate glass are wrong. Ok the first hit is dangerous, there will be deflection. But toughened glass is the commercial standard in Australia & toughened glass always has a shatter point. The correct projectile at correct velocity to break the glass, followed by a head shot, is not rocket science. The terrorist would have had about half a second to react.

(I have worked professionally with glass for many years & currently am working on a commercial art glass/ structural glass project, so I do know what I am talking about)

Somewhat surprisingly this morning the Aussie MSM is asking similar questions, with the cops angle being that they were likely to be avoiding escalation, hence the wait & tragic deaths which followed. This makes some sense, with the cops being in a damned if do damned if don't bind, but the solution I propose above I am sure was possible & would have cost only one life.

Not mentioned anywhere in the MSM is the Lindt Chocolate Company's Jewish connection, which is not widely publicised but not difficult to find online.

Next time, if there is a next time, I doubt the cops will be so hesitant to take any opportunity to wipe out the terrorist. Damned shame for the two innocent dead people.
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9284
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: Why did cops not take out Sydney terrorist?

Unread postby Shaved Monkey » Tue 16 Dec 2014, 18:55:06

SeaGypsy wrote:Not mentioned anywhere in the MSM is the Lindt Chocolate Company's Jewish connection, which is not widely publicised but not difficult to find online.

Pretty sure it wouldn't matter which store was behind the Channel 7 live broadcast.
Being on TV was his agenda.
Jew are pretty big in retail you could almost pick any shop.

beside the death of innocent life the true ramifications of this event are further suspicions and persecution of Muslims and tougher laws on our liberties.
Ready to turn Zombies into WWOOFers
User avatar
Shaved Monkey
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2486
Joined: Wed 30 Mar 2011, 01:43:28

Re: Why did cops not take out Sydney terrorist?

Unread postby Newfie » Tue 16 Dec 2014, 18:59:04

Re...finding a sniper with adequate equipment?

Find a deer hunter!

Any one of my deer rifles is more than up to the task.

And the ability to shoot straight ain't that hard either.

Lots of dead deer will testify to that! :-D
User avatar
Newfie
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 18504
Joined: Thu 15 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Between Canada and Carribean

Re: Why did cops not take out Sydney terrorist?

Unread postby Shaved Monkey » Tue 16 Dec 2014, 22:33:40

Iranian police had requested the extradition of Man Haron Monis, the gunman who was shot dead in the Martin Place siege, 14 years ago but Australian authorities would not hand him over


http://www.theage.com.au/world/sydney-s ... 28qoi.html
Catch 22 do you hand over a refugee to get tortured
He claimed he was ex Iranian security,who escaped.
They claimed he was a wanted criminal.

Zombies they are going to take many forms and have varying triggers to make them zombie.
Ready to turn Zombies into WWOOFers
User avatar
Shaved Monkey
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2486
Joined: Wed 30 Mar 2011, 01:43:28

Re: Why did cops not take out Sydney terrorist?

Unread postby Shaved Monkey » Wed 17 Dec 2014, 01:48:09

The one good thing that may come from this is to tighten gun control so people with a history of mental illness or a crime history cant have a gun licence or access to guns.
Ready to turn Zombies into WWOOFers
User avatar
Shaved Monkey
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2486
Joined: Wed 30 Mar 2011, 01:43:28

Re: Why did cops not take out Sydney terrorist?

Unread postby Scrub Puller » Wed 17 Dec 2014, 05:17:37

Yair . . . Shaved Monkey

The one good thing that may come from this is to tighten gun control so people with a history of mental illness or a crime history cant have a gun licence or access to guns.


Complete bullshit mate, anyone who wants a gun can get one . . . only honest folks like yourself would find it slightly difficult.

Cheers.
Scrub Puller
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 296
Joined: Sun 07 Apr 2013, 13:20:59

Re: Why did cops not take out Sydney terrorist?

Unread postby AndyA » Thu 18 Dec 2014, 01:04:58

Maybe they were trying to send a message to all future terrorists?
If you want the truth to stand clear before you, never be for or against. The struggle between "for" and "against" is the mind's worst disease. -Sen-ts'an
AndyA
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 303
Joined: Sat 10 Aug 2013, 01:26:33

Re: Why did cops not take out Sydney terrorist?

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Thu 18 Dec 2014, 01:09:38

Care to elaborate Andy?
I suspect next time something like this occurs the sniper option is far more likely than the drawn out attempt at a negotiated resolution tactic which was clearly the priority manifesto in this case. The deaths of two of the public who could virtually certainly have been saved will force a more aggressive response in future.
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9284
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: Why did cops not take out Sydney terrorist?

Unread postby Shaved Monkey » Thu 18 Dec 2014, 02:29:24

The guy had a shot gun. (double barrell at best he had 2 shot at most)
The cops knew this and it wasnt worth risking peoples lives.
Im sure the authorities did the maths.
He didnt have an automatic weapon because you cant have them in Australia.
If you could lots of people could have died.
The guy who died had a shot gun wound to the head close range when he tackled him.
The girl who died had a heart attack and some shrapnel wounds. (they havent said if it was police or shotgun yet).
Ready to turn Zombies into WWOOFers
User avatar
Shaved Monkey
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2486
Joined: Wed 30 Mar 2011, 01:43:28

Re: Why did cops not take out Sydney terrorist?

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Thu 18 Dec 2014, 02:54:38

I could get a black market automatic short or long for a week or twos pay without a license in any capital city in oz. Maybe because even black marketeers know a Looney when they see one this guy couldnt. As scrubby said.
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9284
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: Why did cops not take out Sydney terrorist?

Unread postby AndyA » Fri 19 Dec 2014, 15:55:10

SeaGypsy wrote:Care to elaborate Andy?
I suspect next time something like this occurs the sniper option is far more likely than the drawn out attempt at a negotiated resolution tactic which was clearly the priority manifesto in this case. The deaths of two of the public who could virtually certainly have been saved will force a more aggressive response in future.
I forgot to add /s
If it had been my family in there I would have taken him out without hesitation, forget refraction by glass and all that shit, if you get hit anywhere with a 338 lapua magnum you will not be in any state to do much more then scream in pain. The Aussies use the Blazer tactical 2, which is a very accurate rifle. Hopefully next time they just do it straight away, and send the right message.
If you want the truth to stand clear before you, never be for or against. The struggle between "for" and "against" is the mind's worst disease. -Sen-ts'an
AndyA
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 303
Joined: Sat 10 Aug 2013, 01:26:33

Re: Why did cops not take out Sydney terrorist?

Unread postby Shaved Monkey » Fri 19 Dec 2014, 17:28:17

There was fear he had a bomb was one of the explanations for not shooting him.
Ready to turn Zombies into WWOOFers
User avatar
Shaved Monkey
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2486
Joined: Wed 30 Mar 2011, 01:43:28

Re: Why did cops not take out Sydney terrorist?

Unread postby FarQ3 » Wed 24 Dec 2014, 17:57:21

Exactly right SG, the gun laws are only observed by law abiding citizens. In Australia anyone can still get access to firearms and ammunition through illegal connections if you are willing to part with the money. Tightening of gun laws has only affected honest citizens. Occasionally a police raid will turn up automatic weapons or even grenade launchers etc. none of these were obtained legally just as the firearm in this case was not obtained legally.

The terrorist claimed he was wired for explosives and also had explosives set at two alternate sites with accomplices, the first claim was not beyond him, the second claim was dismissed quite early on.

Shooting through structural glass may not only cause significant deflection (enough to miss as the terrorist did not stand close to the window) but also depending on the projectile used could have caused significant shrapnel injuries to the hostages as the projectile would likely break up on impact with the glass. Angle of glass impact needs to be uniformly zero to negate significant deflection. The damaged window would not have broken and would have become opaque after being penetrated by the first projectile. Shooting people through structural glass is nothing like shooting deer.

In any case, the tactical sniper did not get clearance to shoot.
Oils just aint oils ..... unless you believe the IEA :)
User avatar
FarQ3
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 82
Joined: Wed 19 Jan 2011, 19:32:35
Location: Western Australia

Re: Why did cops not take out Sydney terrorist?

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Wed 24 Dec 2014, 18:30:46

If you check the footage of the moment the police went in, the first impact was some kind of ballistic device which the cops fired with a bunch of them standing in the deflection zone. The glass door immediately shatters & drops to ground. Seems they do have a specialized tool none of us here knew about maybe.

In defence of the cops decision to wait, despite having multiple chances in daylight which would have multiplied when the night vision gave a very clear upper hand; police must have placed too much kudos in their negotiator's interpretation of the terrorist's communications. They must have believed the guy could be talked down. Also they had no way of predicting the now dead cafe manager would try to jump the gunman as he appeared to dose off.

It will be months before the full report is issued, which is being undertaken at ministerial level accross the agencies involved.
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9284
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests

cron