In both the United States and Canada, activism against tar sands, pipelines and climate change has soared in recent years.
But while President Obama has encouraged citizens to "stand up and speak up" to demand change on energy, Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper's administration has tried to silence critics of pro-tar sands policies.
In the most recent evidence, seven influential environmental organizations have become the subject of rigorous audits by the Canada Revenue Agency.
Activists allege that the scrutiny is an attempt by the Harper administration to subdue tar sands opponents as decision time looms for pipelines needed to bring Alberta's landlocked oil to market—the Texas-bound Keystone XL and the Northern Gateway to the Pacific Coast of British Columbia.
"Canadians are starting to understand that the government has overstepped and overreached in its attacks against environmentalists and scientists," said Tzeporah Berman, a Vancouver-based environmentalist and co-founder of the activist group ForestEthics. "We're seeing a growing grassroots movement as a result. … People are angry."
The prime minister's office directed requests for comment to the Canadian Revenue Agency (CRA). Noël Carisse, a spokesman for CRA, said that since 2012 "the CRA has conducted additional review activities focused on political activities. Audits are being conducted in addition to our regular audit activities, and will include charities from across the entire spectrum of charitable activity."
The revenue agency is auditing the environmentalists for possible abuse of their nonprofit charitable status, which exempts them from paying taxes and allows donors to claim contributions as tax deductions. Canadian law states that nonprofits can only use 10 percent of their resources for political advocacy work. The CRA is investigating whether the groups exceeded this limit.
For decades, Canadian nonprofits interpreted political advocacy to mean they couldn't endorse candidates or elected officials. Like in the United States for tax-exempt organizations, support for or criticism of government policy was customary.
"They are seemingly reinterpreting what they perceive as being political activity," said Tim Gray, executive director of Environmental Defence, one of the green groups being audited. "It is a shifting landscape."
Loki wrote:Try again Nancy, ain't no one saying nothing about "eco-terrorists." More hysterical nonsense from you. Give it a break.
AndyA wrote:What does "Eco" mean?
KaiserJeep wrote:Loki wrote:Try again Nancy, ain't no one saying nothing about "eco-terrorists." More hysterical nonsense from you. Give it a break.
You should have read the linked article before inserting your size 13 into your pie hole:
"The former Federal Regulatory Commissioner, Jon Wellinghoff, told the Wall St. Journal it was "the most significant incident of domestic terrorism involving the grid that has ever occurred" in the U.S."
Have a nice one
KaiserJeep wrote:Tip: Whenever the WSJ asks you for a subscription (I have a print subscription) you should search on the full text of the article name, as many of their articles are reprinted in multiple publications.
I was grounding a network transformer yesterday and a drunk bum threw a empty bottle in the manhole. My first thought was terrorist.
http://www.electriciantalk.com/f2/wsj-a ... 56/index4/
Pops wrote:If a group were to make drain plugs in the very large transformers at a dozen or so critical substations around the country lots of lights would go out. Not sure how readily those things are repairable (if at all) but this would surely be a big deal even if for a short time.
Not sure where the "eco" part comes in.
Alfred Tennyson wrote:We are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.
Subjectivist wrote:When I was researching using waste oil for diesel engines online I came across a thread on a different group by an electrical worker. He claimed to fuel all of his personel trucks with a mixture of used transformer cooling oil and diesel fuel as a way of cutting fuel costs for his department at the power company. Not sure how true it was, after all he was just some guy on the internet, but given that the oil they use is rather like regular motor oil in consistancy it was certainly possible.
I imagine a pool of hat kind of oil would be hard to ignite, but once it got going the fire would b hard to extinguish ithout foam, and if there was current flowing in the fire department couldn't do that until confirming he power was off. Nobody wants electrocuted fire fighters, those guys and gals have a dangerous enough job as is.
Return to Environment, Weather & Climate
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 119 guests