Plantagenet wrote:I certainly hope that the IEA is right in their prediction that global oil demand will peak by the end of the decade.
That would be right in line with my prediction, made several years ago, that global peak oil will occur in the 2020s.
Plantagenet Tue 30 Oct 2007 wrote:Do you even understand what peak oil is?
There is no way to "get out of it." In fact, we probably already hit global Peak Oil production levels in latest 2005 or 2006.
see link below.And while gasoline is useful in maintaining our frivolous car-centric lifestyles, it contributes little to nothing to uphold a stable flow of raw materials and energy into the economy. Viewed through this narrow lens, the really useful, economically vital energy content of oil is actually a rather small portion (20–30%)
theluckycountry wrote:The IEA .... prognostications can safely be ignored.
theluckycountry wrote:These "New" peak oil dates are a shell game played by those invested in keeping the status quo going.....
theluckycountry wrote:The IEA is a political entity and it's prognostications can safely be ignored. Just as one would ignore a political statistic on the unemployment rate, or the inflation rate.'
theluckycountry wrote:The quoted number of barrels of oil produced today (or oil equivalent as is used now) is irrelevant because so much of it is poured back into the ground to produce more. It's an accounting trick basically because ALL that extra oil is not available to power our civilization, only to power more oil extraction.
Plantagenet wrote:So when an individual like myself or an international agency set up to analyze global energy like the IEA predict peak oil will happen in the 2020s.....
Plantagenet wrote on Wed 11 Apr 2007 at peakoil.com wrote:I saw Prof. Deffeyes speak in late 2005, just after he had just predicted peak oil was reached about Thanksgiving 2005.I think Deffeyes might have nailed it, and we are just past the overall peak in oil production.
Plantagenet wrote:So when an individual like myself or an international agency set up to analyze global energy like the IEA predict peak oil will happen in the 2020s, that is somehow an attempt to keep the status quo going, even though peak oil will mean a complete disruption of the status quo?
theluckycountry wrote:Several nations are still flush with resources and are doing ok, Australia is one. BTW we toyed with the idea of fracked oil, it was a big story back in 2008 but the government tossed the idea out because it's a dead-end.
theluckycountry wrote:Your oil bonanza is a scam, just another grift pulled on the American public.
theluckycountry wrote:A wealthy society provides homes for it's people and doesn't let them live and defecate in the street.
theluckycountry wrote:But Adam_B said we would all be driving electric cars and not need oil?
theluckycountry wrote: Where is Adam_B? Out driving his Tesla(s) perhaps?
AdamB wrote:Overproduction and overconsumption aren't part of EV manufacturing, normal production (to build said EV) and normal consumption (in buying said EV) are.
the-electric-vehicle-ev-thread-pt-14-t78588-80.html#p1490693Looks like peak-EV has arrived.
Electrifying the car market may be getting harder. Here's why
theluckycountry wrote:So you came crawling back into the forum did you.
theluckycountry wrote:Current events negate every post you have ever made on the subject and bring every other post you ever made into question. In other words adam, you're a failure.
AdamB wrote:the project I am currently working on won't be done for another couple months
mousepad wrote:You finally got a job, Adam? Good for you. Did you voluntarily go back to work?
mousepad wrote:AdamB wrote:the project I am currently working on won't be done for another couple months
You finally got a job, Adam? Good for you.
mousepad wrote:Did you voluntarily go back to work?
muosepad wrote:Or did the EV subsidies from the generous state of Colorado run out and you need to make ends meet?
Hey guys! I am doing an energy debate in my physics class about energies and their viabilities/advantages and it is going to be EXTREMLEY competitive and I absolutley HAVE to win.
The four energies categories being debated are:
1. Fossil Fuel, Natural Gas, Coal
2. Nuclear
3. Wind/Solar/Hydroelectric
4. Fuel Cell, Hydrogen. Biodiesel, Ethanol, Methanol
... - Oil is on the way out. A new energy source is going to have to fill the gap left by it, and do we really want it to be nuclear energy? Solar Panels can pay for themselves over time, and consistently becoming more viable alternatives for energy. There are still many oppurtunities to increase our Hydroelectric productivity... rant rant rant
The industrial production process for alumina from bauxite was developed in 1887 by the chemist Karl-Josef Bayer
Part one-
The bauxite is crushed then mixed with soda at high temperature and under pressure. The solution obtained, sodium aluminate, is stripped of its impurities, then diluted and cooled, which causes the precipitation of hydrated aluminium oxide. The product of this process is then reduced to a powder to obtain the alumina intended for the production of aluminium.
Part two-
Refining Alumina into Aluminum
The conversion of alumina to aluminum is carried out via a smelting method known as the Hall-Heroult Process. This process entails dissolving the alumina in cryolite, a molten solvent. An electrical current is run through the mixture, causing the carbon from the carbon anode to attach to the oxygen component in the alumina, yielding aluminum and carbon dioxide: 2 Al2O3 + 3 C > 4 Al + 3 CO2
This process takes place at temperatures between 940-980º C and yields an aluminum of high purity
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests